World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
68
Citations
22493
World Ranking
1500
National Ranking
549

Joel Cracraft publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Cracraft sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 182 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Joel Cracraft D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Cracraft sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Joel Cracraft is affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the broader fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Environmental Science. The scientist's work frequently addresses key topics such as genetic diversity and population structure, evolution and paleontology studies, species distribution and climate change, genomics and phylogenetic studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant and animal studies, and paleontology and evolutionary biology.

Joel Cracraft's scholarly output includes several recent papers published in prestigious journals. Among these are:

  • Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics (2020) in Nature
  • The evolution of a tropical biodiversity hotspot (2020) in Science
  • Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes (2024) in Nature
  • Specimen collection is essential for modern science (2023) in PLoS Biology
  • River network rearrangements promote speciation in lowland Amazonian birds (2022) in Science Advances

The scientist has contributed frequently to several publication venues, with multiple articles appearing in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Nature, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Ecology and Evolution, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Throughout their career, Joel Cracraft has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robb T. Brumfield
  • Camila C. Ribas
  • Edward L. Braun
  • Alexandre Luis Padovan Aleixo
  • Peter A. Hosner

In terms of specialization, Joel Cracraft's work encompasses multiple subfields, such as paleontology, genetics, nature and landscape conservation, molecular biology, and ecological modeling.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1998.

Best Publications

  • Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds

    Erich D. Jarvis;Siavash Mirarab;Andre J. Aberer;Bo Li;Bo Li;Bo Li

  • Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis

    Joel Cracraft

  • Historical Biogeography and Patterns of Differentiation within the South American Avifauna: Areas of Endemism

    Joel Cracraft

  • Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process.

    Vicki A. Funk;Niles Eldredge;Joel Cracraft

  • Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation

    F. Keith Barker;Alice Cibois;Peter Schikler;Julie Feinstein

  • Genome 10K: A Proposal to Obtain Whole-Genome Sequence for 10 000 Vertebrate Species

    David Haussler;Stephen J. O'Brien;Oliver A. Ryder;F. Keith Barker

  • A palaeobiogeographic model for biotic diversification within Amazonia over the past three million years

    Camila C. Ribas;Camila C. Ribas;Alexandre Aleixo;Afonso C. R. Nogueira;Cristina Yumi Miyaki

  • Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology

    Niles Eldredge;Joel Cracraft

  • Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics.

    Shaohong Feng;Josefin Stiller;Yuan Deng;Joel Armstrong;Joel Armstrong

  • PATTERNS AND PROCESSES OF DIVERSIFICATION: SPECIATION AND HISTORICAL CONGRUENCE IN SOME NEOTROPICAL BIRDS.

    Joel Cracraft;Joel Cracraft;Richard O. Prum

  • Assembling the tree of life

    M. F. Whiting;J. Cracraft;M. Donoghue

  • Lineage diversification and morphological evolution in a large-scale continental radiation: the neotropical ovenbirds and woodcreepers (aves: Furnariidae).

    Elizabeth P. Derryberry;Santiago Claramunt;Graham Derryberry;R. Terry Chesser

  • Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event.

    Joel Cracraft

  • Toward a Phylogenetic Classification of the Recent Birds of the World (Class Aves)

    Joel Cracraft

  • A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds

    Santiago Claramunt;Joel Cracraft

  • Earth history and the passerine superradiation

    Carl H Oliveros;Daniel Jared Field;Daniel Jared Field;Daniel T Ksepka;F Keith Barker

  • The evolution of a tropical biodiversity hotspot

    Michael G. Harvey;Michael G. Harvey;Gustavo A. Bravo;Gustavo A. Bravo;Santiago Claramunt;Santiago Claramunt;Santiago Claramunt;Andrés M. Cuervo;Andrés M. Cuervo

  • PHYLOGENY AND EVOLUTION OF THE RATITE BIRDS

    Joel Cracraft

  • Patterns of diversification within continental biotas: Hierarchical congruence among the areas of endemism of Australian vertebrates

    J Cracraft

  • Specimen collection: An essential tool

    L. A. Rocha;A. Aleixo;G. Allen;F. Almeda

  • Continental drift, paleoclimatology, and the evolution and biogeography of birds

    Joel Cracraft

  • Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology

    Steven P. Churchill;N. Eldredge;J. Cracraft

Frequent Co-Authors

Camila C. Ribas
Camila C. Ribas National Institute of Amazonian Research
Alexandre Aleixo
Alexandre Aleixo Instituto Tecnológico Vale
Robb T. Brumfield
Robb T. Brumfield Louisiana State University
Robert G. Moyle
Robert G. Moyle University of Kansas
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen
Frederick H. Sheldon
Frederick H. Sheldon Louisiana State University
Brant C. Faircloth
Brant C. Faircloth Louisiana State University
Elizabeth P. Derryberry
Elizabeth P. Derryberry University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Erich D. Jarvis
Erich D. Jarvis Rockefeller University
Edward L. Braun
Edward L. Braun University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution offers diverse opportunities, but students often consider related fields that offer flexible online learning options. Comparing costs is essential, especially for those interested in interdisciplinary careers; for example, the cost of mlis degree us resource explains the affordability of earning a Master’s in Library and Information Science in the US.

Healthcare and communication sciences are increasingly popular alternatives. Prospective students seeking speech-language careers can find asha accredited online slp master's programs that meet national professional standards, allowing for online study without sacrificing accreditation.

Many degree holders also investigate online bridge programs non-SLP majors, which serve students from unrelated backgrounds who wish to change careers into high-demand fields such as speech-language pathology.

For those interested in healthcare outside of traditional pre-med or biology tracks, online absn programs for non nurses provide accelerated pathways to become a registered nurse, often leveraging previous bachelor’s degrees for a swift transition. Exploring these online degrees can open new avenues for employing ecological and evolutionary knowledge in broader professional contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Joel Cracraft

Trending Scientists