World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Mexico
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 69 759 699 8 8 240 15211

Martin J. Kropff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin J. Kropff between 1984 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin J. Kropff published across 38 years, from 1984 to 2021, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2001. 4 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2001. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 20 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1984 2021

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin J. Kropff: publications per year, 1984 to 2021
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 3
1988 2
1989 8
1990 5
1991 6
1992 7
1993 11
1994 17
1995 20
1996 10
1997 17
1998 6
1999 10
2000 11
2001 22
2002 20
2003 14
2004 4
2005 4
2006 6
2007 7
2008 3
2009 5
2010 2
2011 3
2012 2
2013 2
2014 2
2015 4
2016 4
2017 3
2018 5
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
Total 252
Download as CSV

Martin J. Kropff publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Kropff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 236–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 240 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64 240
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Martin J. Kropff D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Kropff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32 69
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Mexico Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Mexico Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Mexico Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Agronomy

His main research concerns Agronomy, Crop, Weed, Botany and Competition. His Soil water research extends to Agronomy, which is thematically connected. His Crop research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Biotechnology, Cultivar, Yield and Crop production.

His studies deal with areas such as Crop growth and Plant breeding as well as Cultivar. His Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Agrometeorology and Horticulture. His Competition research incorporates elements of Agroforestry, Intercropping, Weed control and Simulation modeling.

His most cited work include:

  • ON APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS OF THE WAGENINGEN CROP MODELS (509 citations)
  • A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature (275 citations)
  • Modelling crop-weed interactions. (232 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Martin J. Kropff focuses on Agronomy, Weed, Crop, Agroforestry and Weed control. He focuses mostly in the field of Agronomy, narrowing it down to topics relating to Competition and, in certain cases, Interspecific competition. As a part of the same scientific family, Martin J. Kropff mostly works in the field of Weed, focusing on Simulation modeling and, on occasion, Production.

In his research on the topic of Crop, Specific leaf area is strongly related with Growing season. His research in Agroforestry intersects with topics in Cropping, Agriculture and Tillage. Martin J. Kropff has researched Cultivar in several fields, including Panicle, Poaceae, photoperiodism and Phenology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (52.70%)
  • Weed (19.82%)
  • Crop (16.22%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2021)?

  • Agronomy (52.70%)
  • Agriculture (9.46%)
  • Agroforestry (14.41%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Agronomy, Agriculture, Agroforestry, Cropping and Agricultural science. Martin J. Kropff regularly ties together related areas like Crop residue in his Agronomy studies. His study in the fields of Organic farming under the domain of Agriculture overlaps with other disciplines such as Context.

His work carried out in the field of Agroforestry brings together such families of science as Forestry and Crop rotation. His research in Agricultural science intersects with topics in Productivity, Win-win game and Paddy field. The various areas that Martin J. Kropff examines in his Weed study include Weed control, Tillage and Green manure.

Between 2008 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Cover crop residue management for optimizing weed control (83 citations)
  • Narrow rows reduce biomass and seed production of weeds and increase maize yield (35 citations)
  • Sublethal effects of herbicides on the biomass and seed production of terrestrial non-crop plant species, influenced by environment, development stage and assessment date. (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Agronomy

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Agriculture, Weed, Crop yield and Crop. His Agronomy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Terrestrial plant, Terrestrial ecosystem and Vegetation. His study in Agriculture is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Agroforestry, Resource, Production, Natural resource economics and Effects of global warming.

His studies in Weed integrate themes in fields like Crop residue, Cover crop, Lactuca, Weed control and Tillage. His study looks at the intersection of Crop yield and topics like Food security with Crop simulation model, Environmental planning and Environmental data. Martin J. Kropff works mostly in the field of Crop, limiting it down to concerns involving Sowing and, occasionally, Randomized block design, Intercropping, Cultivar and Competition.

Best Publications

  • ON APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS OF THE WAGENINGEN CROP MODELS

    M.K van Ittersum;P.A Leffelaar;H van Keulen;M.J Kropff

  • ORYZA2000: modeling lowland rice

    B.A.M. Bouman;M.J. Kropff;To Phuc Tuong;Marco Wopereis

  • A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature

    Xinyou Yin;Martin J. Kropff;Graham McLaren;Romeo M. Visperas

  • Modelling crop-weed interactions.

    M. J. Kropff;H. H. van Laar

  • Simulating the impact of climate change on rice production in Asia and evaluating options for adaptation

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;T. Horie;D. Bachelet

  • Applications of systems approaches in plant breeding : proceedings of the SARP applications workshop held at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines, 18 April - 6 May, 1994

    P. K. Aggarwal;R. B. Matthews;M. J. Kropff;H. H. van Laar

  • Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement

    G.L. Hammer;M.J. Kropff;T.R. Sinclair;J.R. Porter

  • Ecological weed management by cover cropping: effects on weed growth in autumn and weed establishment in spring

    H M Kruidhof;L Bastiaans;M J Kropff

  • Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships.

    Xinyou Yin;Paul C. Struik;Martin J. Kropff

  • DROUGHT-STRESS RESPONSES OF TWO LOWLAND RICE CULTIVARS TO SOIL WATER STATUS

    M.C.S. Wopereis;M.J. Kropff;A.R. Maligaya;T.P. Tuong

  • Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement

    K.J. Boote;M.J. Kropff;P.S. Bindraban

  • Intercropping leeks to suppress weeds

    D.T. Baumann;M.J. Kropff;L. Bastiaans

  • Annual losses of weed seeds due to predation in organic cereal fields

    P. R. Westerman;J. S. Wes;M. J. Kropff;W. Van Der Werf

  • Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production

    M. J. Kropff

  • Nitrogen use efficiency of rice reconsidered: What are the key constraints?

    K. G. Cassman;M. J. Kropff;J. Gaunt;S. Peng

  • ORYZA 1 : an ecophysiological model for irrigated rice production

    M.J. Kropff;H.H. van Laar;R.B. Matthews

  • Modeling the impact of climate change on rice production in Asia.

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;D. Bachelet;T. Horie

  • Systems approaches for the design of sustainable agro-ecosystems

    M.J. Kropff;J. Bouma;J.W. Jones

  • Crop Modeling, QTL Mapping, and Their Complementary Role in Plant Breeding

    Xinyou Yin;Piet Stam;Martin J. Kropff;Ad H. C. M. Schapendonk

  • Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design: II. Competitive ability of several clover species

    N.G. den Hollander;L. Bastiaans;M.J. Kropff

  • Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on Rice Production in Asia

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;D. Bachelet;H.H. van Laar

Frequent Co-Authors

Lammert Bastiaans
Lammert Bastiaans Wageningen University & Research
W. van der Werf
W. van der Werf Wageningen University & Research
Kenneth G. Cassman
Kenneth G. Cassman University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Xinyou Yin
Xinyou Yin Wageningen University & Research
Alfred Stein
Alfred Stein University of Twente
Bas A. M. Bouman
Bas A. M. Bouman International Rice Research Institute
Takeshi Horie
Takeshi Horie Kyoto University
Pramod K. Aggarwal
Pramod K. Aggarwal Borlaug Institute for South Asia
Johan Bouma
Johan Bouma Wageningen University & Research
Jonne Rodenburg
Jonne Rodenburg University of Greenwich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Kropff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles