World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

W. van der Werf publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. van der Werf sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

W. van der Werf D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. van der Werf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Increasing corn for biofuel production reduces biocontrol services in agricultural landscapes

    D A Landis;M M Gardiner;W van der Werf;Scott M Swinton

  • Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: A meta-analysis

    Yang Yu;Tjeerd-Jan Stomph;David Makowski;Wopke van der Werf

  • Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton

    L. Zhang;L. Zhang;W. van der Werf;L. Bastiaans;S. Zhang

  • Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop

    Lili Mao;Lizhen Zhang;Weiqi Li;Wopke van der Werf

  • Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems

    L. Zhang;L. Zhang;W. van der Werf;S. Zhang;B. Li

  • Intercropping maize and soybean increases efficiency of land and fertilizer nitrogen use; A meta-analysis

    Zhan Xu;Zhan Xu;Chunjie Li;Chunjie Li;Chaochun Zhang;Chaochun Zhang;Yang Yu

  • Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield

    Ben A. Woodcock;M. P. D. Garratt;G.D. Powney;R.F. Shaw

  • Sampling and monitoring in crop protection. The theoretical basis for developing practical decision guides.

    M.R. Binns;J.P. Nyrop;W. van der Werf

  • Annual losses of weed seeds due to predation in organic cereal fields

    P. R. Westerman;J. S. Wes;M. J. Kropff;W. Van Der Werf

  • Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields

    P.R Westerman;A Hofman;L.E.M Vet;W van der Werf

  • Yield-SAFE: A parameter-sparse process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth and production in agroforestry systems

    Wopke van der Werf;Karel Keesman;Paul Burgess;Anil Graves

  • Crop growth, light utilization and yield of relay intercropped cotton as affected by plant density and a plant growth regulator

    Lili Mao;Lizhen Zhang;Xinhua Zhao;Shaodong Liu

  • A meta-analysis of relative crop yields in cereal/legume mixtures suggests options for management

    Yang Yu;Tjeerd-Jan Stomph;David Makowski;Lizhen Zhang

  • Designing intercrops for high yield, yield stability and efficient use of resources: Are there principles?

    Tjeerd Jan Stomph;Christos Dordas;Alain Baranger;Joshua de Rijk

  • Optimizing soaking and germination conditions to improve gamma-aminobutyric acid content in japonica and indica germinated brown rice

    Qian Zhang;Jun Xiang;Lizhen Zhang;Xiaofeng Zhu

  • Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable and forestry systems in three European countries

    A.R. Graves;P.J. Burgess;J.H.N. Palma;F. Herzog

  • Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Xylella fastidiosa in the EU territory, with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options

    Richard Baker;Claude Bragard;David Caffier;Thierry Candresse

  • Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: A meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning

    Chunjie Li;Chunjie Li;Ellis Hoffland;Thomas W. Kuyper;Yang Yu

  • Actionable knowledge for ecological intensification of agriculture

    Willemien Geertsema;Walter A H Rossing;Douglas A Landis;Felix J J A Bianchi

  • Kicking the Habit: What Makes and Breaks Farmers' Intentions to Reduce Pesticide Use?

    L. Bakker;J. Sok;W. van der Werf;F.J.J.A. Bianchi

  • Early-season predation impacts the establishment of aphids and spread of beet yellows virus in sugar beet

    D. A. Landis;W. van der Werf

  • Influence of temperature on bionomics of cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, on cotton

    J.Y. Xia;W. van der Werf;R. Rabbinge

  • Influence of Host Diversity on Development of Epidemics: An Evaluation and Elaboration of Mixture Theory

    P. Skelsey;W. A. H. Rossing;G. J. T. Kessel;James A. Powell

  • Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe

    J.H.N. Palma;A.R. Graves;P.J. Burgess;W. van der Werf

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of carabid activity-density in cereals do not explain levels of predation on weed seeds

    P. Saska;W. van der Werf;E. de Vries;P.R. Westerman

  • Ability of the Gaussian plume model to predict and describe spore dispersal over a potato crop

    H.P. Spijkerboer;J.E. Beniers;D. Jaspers;H.J. Schouten

  • Nitrogen economy in relay intercropping systems of wheat and cotton

    L.Z. Zhang;J.H.J. Spiertz;S. Zhang;B. Li

  • Land tenure and differential soil fertility management practices among native and migrant farmers in Wenchi, Ghana: implications for interdisciplinary action research

    S. Adjei-Nsiah;C. Leeuwis;K.E. Giller;O. Sakyi-Dawson

  • Towards groundwater neutral cropping systems in the Alluvial Fans of the North China Plain

    P.A.J. van Oort;P.A.J. van Oort;G. Wang;J. Vos;H. Meinke;H. Meinke

  • Economic impact assessment in pest risk analysis

    T.A.A. Soliman;M.C.M. Mourits;A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink;W. van der Werf

  • Narrow rows reduce biomass and seed production of weeds and increase maize yield

    A.B. Mashingaidze;W. van der Werf;L.A.P. Lotz;J. Chipomho

  • Temperature-mediated developmental delay may limit yield of cotton in relay intercrops with wheat

    L.Z. Zhang;L.Z. Zhang;W. van der Werf;S. Zhang;B. Li

  • Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe

    A.R. Graves;P.J. Burgess;J. Palma;K.J. Keesman

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin J. Kropff
Martin J. Kropff International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Jan Vos
Jan Vos Wageningen University & Research
A.H.C. van Bruggen
A.H.C. van Bruggen University of Florida
Paul J. Burgess
Paul J. Burgess Cranfield University
Lammert Bastiaans
Lammert Bastiaans Wageningen University & Research
Jochem B. Evers
Jochem B. Evers Wageningen University & Research
Jaacov Katan
Jaacov Katan Hebrew University of Jerusalem
H. van Keulen
H. van Keulen Wageningen University & Research
Godefridus M. J. Mohren
Godefridus M. J. Mohren Wageningen University & Research
Gerardo Moreno
Gerardo Moreno University of Extremadura

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing W. van der Werf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles