World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
40
Citations
7058
World Ranking
3874
National Ranking
83

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
7927
World Ranking
5766
National Ranking
149

Godefridus M. J. Mohren publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godefridus M. J. Mohren sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 183 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Godefridus M. J. Mohren D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godefridus M. J. Mohren sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Biodiversity

Ecology, Forest ecology, Agroforestry, Forest management and Agronomy are his primary areas of study. Many of his research projects under Ecology are closely connected to Tree root and Root with Tree root and Root, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. Godefridus M. J. Mohren has researched Forest ecology in several fields, including Carbon sequestration, Climate change, Transpiration and Stomatal conductance.

His Agroforestry research incorporates themes from Douglas fir and Logging. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Forest management, Sink, Carbon cycle, Carbon accounting, Afforestation and Forestry is strongly linked to Soil carbon. Godefridus M. J. Mohren combines subjects such as Beech, Soil water, Forest dynamics and Quercus robur with his study of Agronomy.

His most cited work include:

  • El Niño effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. (386 citations)
  • Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach (237 citations)
  • Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review (177 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Godefridus M. J. Mohren mostly deals with Agroforestry, Forestry, Ecology, Agronomy and Forest management. His Agroforestry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biomass, Agriculture, Forest ecology and Logging. His work on Basal area and Site index is typically connected to Scots pine as part of general Forestry study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His Climate change, Ecological succession, Woodland and Prosopis study, which is part of a larger body of work in Ecology, is frequently linked to Atmospheric sciences, bridging the gap between disciplines. His research integrates issues of Soil water and Nutrient in his study of Agronomy. The various areas that Godefridus M. J. Mohren examines in his Forest management study include Carbon sequestration, Soil carbon and Kyoto Protocol.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agroforestry (28.07%)
  • Forestry (26.90%)
  • Ecology (24.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Basal area (8.77%)
  • Thinning (9.94%)
  • Site index (8.19%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Basal area, Thinning, Site index, Forestry and Agronomy. His Site index research also works with subjects such as

  • Statistics together with Larch and Beech,
  • Stand Density Index which connect with Gompertz function. In the subject of general Forestry, his work in National forest inventory is often linked to Scots pine, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His study in the field of Monoculture, Productivity and Crop is also linked to topics like Yield. Godefridus M. J. Mohren has included themes like Forest management, Agroforestry, Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in his Monoculture study. His study in Forest management is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Competition and Tree species.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Species and soil effects on overyielding of tree species mixtures in the Netherlands (14 citations)
  • Ecology, growth and management of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), a non-native species integrated into European forests (6 citations)
  • Rainfall seasonality and drought performance shape the distribution of tropical tree species in Ghana. (6 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Biodiversity

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Forest management, Productivity, Soil water and Scots pine. His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Eucalyptus, Eucalyptus saligna, Hectare and Nutrient. His Forest management study is related to the wider topic of Agroforestry.

In most of his Agroforestry studies, his work intersects topics such as Agriculture. His Soil water study incorporates themes from Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, Pedunculate and Quercus robur. Scots pine overlaps with fields such as Beech and Climate change in his research.

Best Publications

  • Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review

    Monique Weemstra;Liesje Mommer;Eric J. W. Visser;Jasper van Ruijven

  • El Niño effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems.

    Milena Holmgren;Marten Scheffer;Exequiel Ezcurra;Julio R. Gutiérrez

  • Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach

    Omar R. Masera;J. F. Garza-Caligaris;Markku Kanninen;Timo Karjalainen

  • Temporal evolution of the European forest sector carbon sink from 1950 to 1999

    Gert-Jan Nabuurs;Gert-Jan Nabuurs;Mart-Jan Schelhaas;Godefridus (frits) M. J. Mohren;Christopher B. Field

  • Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India

    Meenakshi Kaul;G. M. J. Mohren;V. K. Dadhwal

  • The impact of the 2003 summer drought on the intra-annual growth pattern of beech (Fagus sylvatica l.) and oak (Quercus robur L.) on a dry site in the Netherlands

    G.W. van der Werf;Ute G.W. Sass-Klaassen;G.M.J. Mohren

  • Are drought and wildfires turning Mediterranean cork oak forests into persistent shrublands

    Vanda Acácio;Vanda Acácio;Milena Holmgren;Francisco Rego;Francisco Moreira

  • Simulation of forest growth, applied to douglas fir stands in the Netherlands

    G.M.J. Mohren

  • Evaluation of six process‐based forest growth models using eddy‐covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe

    K. Kramer;I. Leinonen;H. H. Bartelink;P. Berbigier

  • Phosphorus deficiency induced by nitrogen input in Douglas fir in the Netherlands

    G. M. J. Mohren;J. Van Den Burg;F. W. Burger

  • Forests under climate change and air pollution: gaps in understanding and future directions for research

    R. Matyssek;G. Wieser;C. Calfapietra;W. de Vries

  • The role of European forests in the global carbon cycle—A review

    G.J. Nabuurs;R. Päivinen;R. Sikkema;G.M.J. Mohren

  • An approach towards an estimate of the impact of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget: Germany as a case study

    Timo Karjalainen;Ari Pussinen;Jari Liski;Jari Liski;Gert-Jan Nabuurs;Gert-Jan Nabuurs

  • Forest development in relation to ungulate grazing: a modeling approach

    I.T.M Jorritsma;A.F.M van Hees;G.M.J Mohren

  • Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems

    G.M.J. Mohren;K. Kramer;S. Sabaté

  • CO2FIX V 3.1 - A modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems

    M.J. Schelhaas;P.W. van Esch;T.A. Groen;B.H.J. de Jong

  • Controls on Coarse Wood Decay in Temperate Tree Species: Birth of the LOGLIFE Experiment

    Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Ute Sass-Klaassen;Lourens Poorter;Koert van Geffen

  • Origin matters! Difference in drought tolerance and productivity of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)) provenances

    Britta Eilmann;Sven M.G. de Vries;Jan den Ouden;Godefridus M.J. Mohren

  • Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems

    A.T. Kuiters;G.M.J. Mohren;S.E. Van Wieren

  • Modelling analysis of potential carbon sequestration in selected forest types

    G.J. Nabuurs;G.M.J. Mohren

  • Ecology, growth and management of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), a non-native species integrated into European forests

    Valeriu‑Norocel Nicolescu;Károly Rédei;William Mason;Torsten Vor

  • Carbon fixation through forestation activities : a study of the carbon sequestering potential of selected forest types, commissioned by the Foundation Face

    G.J. Nabuurs;G.M.J. Mohren

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert-Jan Nabuurs
Gert-Jan Nabuurs Wageningen University & Research
Frank J. Sterck
Frank J. Sterck Wageningen University & Research
Koen Kramer
Koen Kramer Wageningen University & Research
Jari Liski
Jari Liski Finnish Meteorological Institute
Mart-Jan Schelhaas
Mart-Jan Schelhaas Wageningen University & Research
Lourens Poorter
Lourens Poorter Wageningen University & Research
Markku Kanninen
Markku Kanninen University of Helsinki
Omar Masera
Omar Masera National Autonomous University of Mexico
Timo Karjalainen
Timo Karjalainen Finnish Forest Research Institute
Milena Holmgren
Milena Holmgren Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Godefridus M. J. Mohren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles