World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
12465
World Ranking
4494
National Ranking
381

Ortrud K. Steinlein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ortrud K. Steinlein sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 190 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ortrud K. Steinlein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ortrud K. Steinlein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ortrud K. Steinlein is affiliated with the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and biology, with a notable emphasis on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, physiology, molecular biology, cancer research, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine, with 33 publications, and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, comprising 15 publications. Their subfields reveal a focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (14 publications), Physiology (7), Molecular Biology (7), Cancer Research (6), and Psychiatry and Mental Health (3).

Steinlein's research covers a variety of important topics. These include:

  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Renal and related cancers
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors in their work are:

  • Elke Sattler
  • Marlene Reithmair
  • Zulfiya Syunyaeva
  • Benedikt Kirchner
  • Michael W. Pfaffl

Their publications have appeared in several noteworthy venues, primarily contributing to these journals:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Pneumologie
  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • European Journal of Cancer
  • Epilepsy & Behavior

Among their recent papers are:

  • Genetic Risk Factors for Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome (2020) - CHEST Journal
  • Colorectal cancer risk in families with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome increased (2021) - European Journal of Cancer
  • Remarkable effect of transdermal nicotine in children with CHRNA4-related autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (2020) - Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Update of penetrance estimates in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (2023) - Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Progranulin signaling in sepsis, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and COVID-19: a comparative, observational study (2021) - Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Best Publications

  • A missense mutation in the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 4 subunit is associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

    Ortrud K. Steinlein;John C. Mulley;Peter Propping;Robyn H. Wallace;Robyn H. Wallace

  • A Potassium Channel Mutation in Neonatal Human Epilepsy

    Christian Biervert;Björn C. Schroeder;Björn C. Schroeder;Björn C. Schroeder;Christian Kubisch;Christian Kubisch;Christian Kubisch;Samuel F. Berkovic;Samuel F. Berkovic;Samuel F. Berkovic

  • An Insertion Mutation of the CHRNA4 Gene in a Family With Autosomal Dominant Nocturnal Frontal Lobe Epilepsy

    Ortrud K. Steinlein;Andres Magnusson;Jens Stoodt;Sonia Bertrand

  • A splice-site mutation in GABRG2 associated with childhood absence epilepsy and febrile convulsions

    Colette Kananura;Karsten Haug;Thomas Sander;Uwe Runge

  • Benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures: characterization of a new sodium channelopathy.

    Samuel F. Berkovic;Sarah E. Heron;Lucio Giordano;Carla Marini

  • Genetic mechanisms that underlie epilepsy

    Ortrud K Steinlein

  • Myokymia and neonatal epilepsy caused by a mutation in the voltage sensor of the KCNQ2 K+ channel

    Karin Dedek;Bernhard Kunath;Colette Kananura;Ulrike Reuner

  • Hippocampal malformation as a cause of familial febrile convulsions and subsequent hippocampal sclerosis

    G. Fernández;O. Effenberger;B. Vinz;O. Steinlein

  • LGI1 is mutated in familial temporal lobe epilepsy characterized by aphasic seizures.

    Wenli Gu;Eylert Brodtkorb;Ortrud K. Steinlein

  • An amino acid exchange in the second transmembrane segment of a neuronal nicotinic receptor causes partial epilepsy by altering its desensitization kinetics

    Sigrid Weiland;Veit Witzemann;Alfredo Villarroel;Peter Propping

  • Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway mutations cause neuromuscular transmission defect.

    Jan Senderek;Jan Senderek;Juliane S. Müller;Marina Dusl;Tim M. Strom

  • Mutated nicotinic receptors responsible for autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy are more sensitive to carbamazepine.

    Fabienne Picard;S Bertrand;O K Steinlein;Daniel Bertrand

  • A reduced K+ current due to a novel mutation in KCNQ2 causes neonatal convulsions.

    H. Lerche;C. Biervert;A. K. Alekov;L. Schleithoff

  • Properties of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mutants from humans suffering from autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy

    S Bertrand;S Weiland;S F Berkovic;O K Steinlein

  • DEPDC5 mutations in families presenting as autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy

    Fabienne Picard;Periklis Makrythanasis;Vincent Navarro;Saeko Ishida

  • Neonatal convulsions and epileptic encephalopathy in an Italian family with a missense mutation in the fifth transmembrane region of KCNQ2.

    Karin Dedek;Lucia Fusco;Nicole Teloy;Ortrud K Steinlein

  • Ion channels and epilepsy in man and mouse

    Ortrud K Steinlein;Jeffrey L Noebels

  • Expression pattern and functional characteristics of two novel splice variants of the two-pore-domain potassium channel TREK-2

    Wenli Gu;Günter Schlichthörl;Jochen R. Hirsch;Hartmut Engels

  • Characterization of Human α4β2-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Stably and Heterologously Expressed in Native Nicotinic Receptor-Null SH-EP1 Human Epithelial Cells

    J. Brek Eaton;Jian Hong Peng;Katherine M. Schroeder;Andrew A. George

  • Cellular and extracellular miRNAs are blood-compartment-specific diagnostic targets in sepsis.

    Marlene Reithmair;Dominik Buschmann;Dominik Buschmann;Melanie Märte;Benedikt Kirchner

  • Benign familial neonatal convulsions: always benign?

    O.K. Steinlein;C. Conrad;B. Weidner

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Sander
Thomas Sander University of Cologne
Daniel Bertrand
Daniel Bertrand University of Geneva
Samuel F. Berkovic
Samuel F. Berkovic University of Melbourne
Peter Propping
Peter Propping University of Bonn
Sonia Bertrand
Sonia Bertrand University of Geneva
Thomas J. Jentsch
Thomas J. Jentsch Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael W. Pfaffl
Michael W. Pfaffl Technical University of Munich
Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Birgit Ertl-Wagner University of Toronto
Ingrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer University of Melbourne
John C. Mulley
John C. Mulley Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right degree pathway is crucial for students interested in neuroscience and related fields. Many students opt for accelerated degree programs to complete their studies faster and enter the workforce sooner.

For those concerned about the financial return on their education, pursuing one of the highest earning degrees can offer significant advantages. Neuroscience often overlaps with majors that are considered some of the most lucrative majors, especially when combined with skills in data analysis, biotechnology, or healthcare.

Affordability is also a key factor. Prospective students can explore online college that accepts fafsa options to gain access to federal financial aid and lower tuition costs. This makes it easier to pursue quality education in neuroscience and related disciplines, while keeping student debt manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Ortrud K. Steinlein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles