World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
40417
World Ranking
5819
National Ranking
3122

Julie R. Palmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie R. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 563 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Julie R. Palmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie R. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie R. Palmer is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has an extensive body of research primarily situated in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work encompasses a diverse range of subfields including Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research topics cover significant areas such as BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Cancer Risks and Factors, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, and Nutritional Studies and Diet.

Frequent co-authors of Julie R. Palmer include Christine B. Ambrosone, Lynn Rosenberg, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Elisa V. Bandera, and Christopher A. Haiman, indicating collaboration with researchers across multiple related domains.

Julie R. Palmer has contributed to multiple publication venues, with the highest number of works appearing in UNC Libraries, followed by Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Cancer Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Breast Cancer Research.

Notable recent papers by Julie R. Palmer include:

  • Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study, 2020, The Lancet Public Health
  • Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States, 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Rapid implementation of mobile technology for real-time epidemiology of COVID-19, 2020, Science
  • Deciphering colorectal cancer genetics through multi-omic analysis of 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of European and east Asian ancestries, 2022, Nature Genetics

Best Publications

  • Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study.

    Long H. Nguyen;David A. Drew;Mark S. Graham;Amit D. Joshi

  • Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States

    Valentina A Zavala;Paige M Bracci;John M Carethers;Luis Carvajal-Carmona

  • A Hypothesis: Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Reduce the Incidence of Large-Bowel Cancer

    Lynn Rosenberg;Julie R. Palmer;Ann G. Zauber;M. Ellen Warshauer

  • A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer

    Chunling Hu;Steven N Hart;Rohan Gnanaolivu;Hongyan Huang

  • Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Lung cancer occurrence in never-smokers: an analysis of 13 cohorts and 22 cancer registry studies.

    Michael J Thun;Lindsay M Hannan;Lucile L Adams-Campbell;Paolo Boffetta

  • Adverse Health Outcomes in Women Exposed In Utero to Diethylstilbestrol

    Robert H. Hoover;Marianne Hyer;Ruth M. Pfeiffer;Ervin Adam

  • Decline in the risk of myocardial infarction among women who stop smoking.

    Lynn Rosenberg;Julie R. Palmer;Samuel Shapiro

  • Sugar-sweetened beverages and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American women.

    Julie R. Palmer;Deborah A. Boggs;Supriya Krishnan;Frank B. Hu

  • Air pollution and incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in black women living in Los Angeles.

    Patricia F. Coogan;Laura F. White;Michael Jerrett;Robert D. Brook

  • Prenatal Diethylstilbestrol Exposure and Risk of Breast Cancer

    Julie R. Palmer;Lauren A. Wise;Elizabeth E. Hatch;Rebecca Troisi

  • Reproductive factors, hormonal contraception, and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women: a prospective study.

    Lauren A. Wise;Julie R. Palmer;Bernard L. Harlow;Donna Spiegelman

  • A common variant at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus is associated with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

    Christopher A. Haiman;Gary K. Chen;Celine M. Vachon;Federico Canzian

  • Dietary calcium and magnesium, major food sources, and risk of type 2 diabetes in U.S. black women.

    Rob M van Dam;Frank B Hu;Lynn Rosenberg;Supriya Krishnan

  • A meta-analysis identifies new loci associated with body mass index in individuals of African ancestry.

    Keri L. Monda;Keri L. Monda;Gary K. Chen;Kira C. Taylor;Kira C. Taylor;Cameron Palmer;Cameron Palmer

  • The Black Women's Health Study: a follow-up study for causes and preventions of illness

    L Rosenberg;L Adams-Campbell;J R Palmer

  • Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28 114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies

    E. E. Calle;S. M. Gapstur;A. V. Patel;L. Dal Maso

  • Advances in the epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease

    J R Palmer

  • Active smoking and secondhand smoke increase breast cancer risk: the report of the Canadian Expert Panel on Tobacco Smoke and Breast Cancer Risk (2009)

    Johnson Kc;Miller Ab;Collishaw Ne;Palmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn Rosenberg
Lynn Rosenberg Boston University
Christine B. Ambrosone
Christine B. Ambrosone Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Elisa V. Bandera
Elisa V. Bandera Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher A. Haiman
Christopher A. Haiman University of Southern California
Andrew F. Olshan
Andrew F. Olshan University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert N. Hoover
Robert N. Hoover National Institutes of Health
Samuel Shapiro
Samuel Shapiro Boston University
Kathryn L. Lunetta
Kathryn L. Lunetta Boston University
Esther M. John
Esther M. John Stanford University
Brian L. Strom
Brian L. Strom Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in medicine but are exploring alternatives to traditional MD programs, there are many online options in the healthcare sector. Choosing the right path depends on your interests, time commitment, and career goals.

For those interested in administrative roles, there are healthcare administration degree programs available online that offer accelerated tracks for quicker entry into healthcare management. If you prefer a clinical care pathway, some students start with nursing programs. It’s now possible to find a nursing school that does not require teas test, which can simplify the admissions process.

Current registered nurses seeking advancement can accelerate their careers through asn to fnp bridge programs, helping them move from an Associate Degree in Nursing to a Family Nurse Practitioner MSN. For those interested in the business and administrative side of healthcare, consider medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to gain critical skills in a high-demand field.

Exploring these diverse pathways allows you to join the healthcare industry with flexible study options, tailored to your unique needs and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Julie R. Palmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles