World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip J. Horner

Philip J. Horner

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
13041
World Ranking
4321
National Ranking
1958

Philip J. Horner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Horner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 153 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip J. Horner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Horner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Horner is affiliated with Houston Methodist in the United States. Their research contributions primarily fall within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, and Molecular Biology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research

Philip J. Horner's scientific output includes recent publications on diverse aspects of neuroscience and neural engineering. Selected recent papers are:

  • "Changes in daily mental health service use and mortality at the commencement and lifting of COVID-19 'lockdown' policy in 10 UK sites: a regression discontinuity in time design," 2021, BMJ Open
  • "Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation improves postural stability in individuals with multiple sclerosis," 2021, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • "Assessing Gq-GPCR-induced human astrocyte reactivity using bioengineered neural organoids," 2022, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • "A micro-LED implant and technique for optogenetic stimulation of the rat spinal cord," 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • "Glial progenitor heterogeneity and key regulators revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing provide insight to regeneration in spinal cord injury," 2023, Cell Reports

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Experimental Neurology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • BMJ Open

Collaborations are an important part of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Dimitry G. Sayenko
  • Matthew Hogan
  • Cinzia Stigliano
  • Alexander G. Steele
  • Amir H. Faraji

Best Publications

  • Regenerating the damaged central nervous system

    Philip J. Horner;Fred H. Gage

  • Proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells throughout the intact adult rat spinal cord

    Philip J. Horner;Ann E. Power;Gerd Kempermann;Gerd Kempermann;H. Georg Kuhn

  • Adult Spinal Cord Stem Cells Generate Neurons after Transplantation in the Adult Dentate Gyrus

    Lamya S. Shihabuddin;Philip J. Horner;Jasodhara Ray;Fred H. Gage

  • Neurotrophin-3 and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Induce Oligodendrocyte Proliferation and Myelination of Regenerating Axons in the Contused Adult Rat Spinal Cord

    Dana M. McTigue;Philip J. Horner;Bradford T. Stokes;Fred H. Gage

  • Progressive Ganglion Cell Degeneration Precedes Neuronal Loss in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma

    Brian P. Buckingham;Denise M. Inman;Wendi Lambert;Ericka Oglesby

  • Distal axonopathy with structural persistence in glaucomatous neurodegeneration

    Samuel D. Crish;Rebecca M. Sappington;Denise M. Inman;Philip J. Horner

  • Reduced retina microglial activation and improved optic nerve integrity with minocycline treatment in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma.

    Alejandra Bosco;Denise M. Inman;Michael R. Steele;Guangming Wu

  • TWIST1 promotes invasion through mesenchymal change in human glioblastoma

    Svetlana A. Mikheeva;Andrei M. Mikheev;Audrey Petit;Richard Beyer

  • A Quantitative Spatial Analysis of the Blood–Spinal Cord Barrier: I. Permeability Changes after Experimental Spinal Contusion Injury

    Phillip G. Popovich;Philip J. Horner;Bradford B. Mullin;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Retinal Ganglion Cells Downregulate Gene Expression and Lose Their Axons within the Optic Nerve Head in a Mouse Glaucoma Model

    Ileana Soto;Ileana Soto;Ericka Oglesby;Brian P. Buckingham;Janice L. Son

  • Fate of endogenous stem/progenitor cells following spinal cord injury.

    Laura Lynn Horky;Francesco Galimi;Fred H. Gage;Philip J. Horner

  • Differential progression of structural and functional alterations in distinct retinal ganglion cell types in a mouse model of glaucoma.

    Luca Della Santina;Denise M. Inman;Caroline B. Lupien;Philip J. Horner

  • Reactive nonproliferative gliosis predominates in a chronic mouse model of glaucoma.

    Denise M. Inman;P. J. Horner

  • Microarray analysis of retinal gene expression in the DBA/2J model of glaucoma.

    Michael R. Steele;Denise M. Inman;David J. Calkins;Philip J. Horner

  • A Conditional Deletion of the NR1 Subunit of the NMDA Receptor in Adult Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn Reduces NMDA Currents and Injury-Induced Pain

    Samantha M. South;Tatsuro Kohno;Brian K. Kaspar;Deborah Hegarty

  • No evidence for chronic demyelination in spared axons after spinal cord injury in a mouse.

    Jurate Lasiene;Larry Shupe;Steve Perlmutter;Philip Horner

  • New roles for astrocytes: The nightlife of an ‘astrocyte’. La vida loca!

    Philip J Horner;Theo D Palmer

  • Defining the NG2-expressing cell of the adult CNS.

    Philip J. Horner;Michaela Thallmair;Fred H. Gage

  • Nonviral approaches for neuronal delivery of nucleic acids.

    Jamie M. Bergen;In Kyu Park;Philip J. Horner;Suzie H. Pun

  • Metabolic vulnerability disposes retinal ganglion cell axons to dysfunction in a model of glaucomatous degeneration

    Selva Baltan;Denise M. Inman;Camelia A. Danilov;Richard S. Morrison

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Calkins
David J. Calkins Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Fred H. Gage
Fred H. Gage Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Monica L. Vetter
Monica L. Vetter University of Utah
Bradford T. Stokes
Bradford T. Stokes The Ohio State University
Lorne M. Mendell
Lorne M. Mendell Stony Brook University
Theo D. Palmer
Theo D. Palmer Stanford University
William J. Bowers
William J. Bowers University of Rochester
Gerd Kempermann
Gerd Kempermann German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Howard J. Federoff
Howard J. Federoff University of California, Irvine
Lisa Schnell
Lisa Schnell University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Horner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles