World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
12954
World Ranking
4672
National Ranking
2107

Aileen J. Anderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aileen J. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Aileen J. Anderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aileen J. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aileen J. Anderson is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions in neurology, pathology and forensic medicine, immunology, molecular biology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The main topics covered in Anderson's work include spinal cord injury research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, nerve injury and regeneration, immune cells in cancer, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, traumatic brain injury research, and neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

Recent publications by Anderson showcase a diverse portfolio of research exploring clinical and experimental approaches to neurological conditions. Notable papers include:

  • Cell-based and stem-cell-based treatments for spinal cord injury: evidence from clinical trials, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Subventricular zone/white matter microglia reconstitute the empty adult microglial niche in a dynamic wave, 2021, eLife
  • Polycistronic Delivery of IL-10 and NT-3 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Myelination and Functional Recovery in a Mouse Spinal Cord Injury Model, 2020, Tissue Engineering Part A
  • Novel C1q receptor-mediated signaling controls neural stem cell behavior and neurorepair, 2020, eLife
  • Lentiviral Interleukin-10 Gene Therapy Preserves Fine Motor Circuitry and Function After a Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Male and Female Mice, 2020, Neurotherapeutics

Their work has been widely cited, reflecting ongoing engagement with cutting-edge neurological research.

Anderson frequently collaborates with several researchers including B. Cummings, Katja Piltti, Sarah E. Hocevar, Lonnie D. Shea, and P Sakthivel. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications contributing to advances in their fields.

In terms of publication venues, Anderson has authored numerous papers in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Neurotherapeutics, PLoS ONE, and PubMed. This range reflects a multidisciplinary approach connecting preprint platforms and peer-reviewed scholarly journals.

Best Publications

  • Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains.

    D. Michele Basso;Lesley C. Fisher;Aileen J. Anderson;Lyn B. Jakeman

  • Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice

    Brian J. Cummings;Nobuko Uchida;Stanley J. Tamaki;Desirée L. Salazar

  • Immunohistochemical evidence for apoptosis in Alzheimer's disease.

    Joseph H. Su;Alleen J. Anderson;Brian J. Cummings;Carl W. Cotman

  • Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: Evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment

    Kevin D. Beck;Hal X. Nguyen;Manuel D. Galvan;Desirée L. Salazar

  • A potential role for apoptosis in neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's disease

    Carl W. Cotman;Aileen J. Anderson

  • DNA damage and apoptosis in Alzheimer's disease: colocalization with c-Jun immunoreactivity, relationship to brain area, and effect of postmortem delay.

    AJ Anderson;JH Su;CW Cotman

  • Odor-induced increases in c-fos mRNA expression reveal an anatomical "unit" for odor processing in olfactory bulb.

    Kathleen M. Guthrie;Aileen J. Anderson;Michael Leon;Christine Gall

  • Activated caspase-3 expression in Alzheimer's and aged control brain: correlation with Alzheimer pathology.

    Joseph H. Su;Ming Zhao;Aileen J. Anderson;Anu Srinivasan

  • Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in an early chronic spinal cord injury NOD-scid mouse model.

    Desirée L. Salazar;Nobuko Uchida;Frank P. T. Hamers;Brian J. Cummings

  • Cell-based and stem-cell-based treatments for spinal cord injury: evidence from clinical trials

    Unknown

  • Polymorphonuclear leukocytes promote neurotoxicity through release of matrix metalloproteinases, reactive oxygen species, and TNF‐α

    Hal X. Nguyen;Thaddeus J. O’Barr;Aileen J. Anderson

  • Voluntary wheel running improves recovery from a moderate spinal cord injury.

    Christie Engesser-Cesar;Aileen J. Anderson;D. Michele Basso;V.R. Edgerton

  • Increased Immunoreactivity for Jun- and Fos-Related Proteins in Alzheimer's Disease: Association with Pathology

    Aileen J. Anderson;Brian J. Cummings;Carl W. Cotman

  • The complement cascade: Yin-Yang in neuroinflammation--neuro-protection and -degeneration.

    Jessy John Alexander;Aileen Judith Anderson;Scott Robert Barnum;Beth Stevens

  • The induction of the TNFalpha death domain signaling pathway in Alzheimer's disease brain.

    Ming Zhao;David H. Cribbs;Aileen J. Anderson;Brian J. Cummings

  • Correlation between Caspase Activation and Neurofibrillary Tangle Formation in Alzheimer’s Disease

    Troy T. Rohn;Elizabeth Head;Joseph H. Su;Aileen J. Anderson

  • Differential Induction of Immediate Early Gene Proteins in Cultured Neurons by β‐Amyloid (Aβ): Association of c‐Jun with Aβ‐Induced Apoptosis

    Aileen J. Anderson;Christian J. Pike;Carl W. Cotman

  • Multifunctional, multichannel bridges that deliver neurotrophin encoding lentivirus for regeneration following spinal cord injury.

    Hannah M. Tuinstra;Misael O. Aviles;Seungjin Shin;Samantha J. Holland

  • Complement activation in the injured central nervous system: another dual-edged sword?

    Faith H Brennan;Aileen J Anderson;Stephen M Taylor;Trent M Woodruff

  • Human Neural Stem Cells Induce Functional Myelination in Mice with Severe Dysmyelination

    Nobuko Uchida;Kevin Chen;Monika Dohse;Kelly D. Hansen

  • Activation of complement pathways after contusion-induced spinal cord injury.

    Aileen J. Anderson;Stephanie Robert;Wencheng Huang;Wise Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
Lonnie D. Shea
Lonnie D. Shea University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David H. Cribbs
David H. Cribbs University of California, Irvine
Kim N. Green
Kim N. Green University of California, Irvine
Trent M. Woodruff
Trent M. Woodruff University of Queensland
Lyn B. Jakeman
Lyn B. Jakeman National Institutes of Health
Stephen A. Back
Stephen A. Back Oregon Health & Science University
Lorne M. Mendell
Lorne M. Mendell Stony Brook University
Irving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman Stanford University
Christopher D. Kroenke
Christopher D. Kroenke Oregon National Primate Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Aileen J. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles