World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 41 6779 6547 79 78 237 21141

Kim H. Esbensen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim H. Esbensen between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim H. Esbensen published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2015. 13 of the 329 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2015. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 8 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 2 publications
1969 2025

329 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim H. Esbensen: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 4
1982 7
1983 1
1984 6
1985 1
1986 2
1987 7
1988 1
1989 8
1990 5
1991 3
1992 5
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 6
2002 3
2003 8
2004 12
2005 15
2006 6
2007 19
2008 11
2009 6
2010 10
2011 7
2012 15
2013 10
2014 19
2015 24
2016 8
2017 12
2018 10
2019 7
2020 8
2021 11
2022 13
2023 2
2024 11
2025 2
Total 329
Download as CSV

Kim H. Esbensen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim H. Esbensen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 237 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321 237
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim H. Esbensen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim H. Esbensen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362 41
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Kim H. Esbensen is affiliated with the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland in Denmark. Their research spans a range of technical fields and applied topics, with a focus on mineral processing, spectroscopy, and sampling methodologies.

The scientist has published multiple papers on topics related to sampling, near-infrared spectroscopy, and process analysis. Recent papers include:

  • Quality and sampling error quantification for gold mineral resource estimation, 2020, Spectroscopy Europe
  • Before reliable near infrared spectroscopic analysis - the critical sampling proviso. Part 2: Particular requirements for near infrared spectroscopy, 2022, Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy
  • Economic arguments for representative sampling, 2021, Spectroscopy Europe
  • Before reliable near infrared spectroscopic analysis - the critical sampling proviso. Part 1: Generalised theory of sampling, 2022, Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy
  • The sampling interface-A critical Theory of Sampling success factor in process sampling and PAT, 2022, TOS forum

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Simon Dominy
  • D. François-Bongarçon
  • Claudia Paoletti
  • D. Aldwin Vogel
  • Nawaf Abu-Khalaf

Kim H. Esbensen's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Spectroscopy Europe
  • TOS forum
  • Sampling Science & Technology
  • Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy
  • Linköping electronic conference proceedings

Their interdisciplinary research encompasses several subfields of study, notably:

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Biophysics

Main topics of research addressed by Kim H. Esbensen include:

  • Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems

Best Publications

  • Principal component analysis

    Svante Wold;Kim H Esbensen;Kim H Esbensen;Paul Geladi;Paul Geladi

  • Multi‐way principal components‐and PLS‐analysis

    Svante Wold;Paul Geladi;Kim Esbensen;Jerker Öhman

  • Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry

    Svante Wold;C. Albano;W. J. Dunn;U. Edlund

  • Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective

    Michael Madsen;Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen;Kim H. Esbensen

  • Representative Sampling for reliable data analysis: Theory Of Sampling

    Lars Petersen;Pentti Minkkinen;Kim H. Esbensen

  • Principal component analysis of multivariate images

    Paul Geladi;Hans Isaksson;Lennart Lindqvist;Svante Wold

  • Strategy of multivariate image analysis (MIA)

    Kim Esbensen;Paul Geladi

  • Representative mass reduction in sampling—a critical survey of techniques and hardware

    Lars Petersen;Casper K. Dahl;Kim H. Esbensen

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and air: statistical analysis and classification by the SIMCA method

    Nils B. Vogt;Frode. Brakstad;Karin. Thrane;Svein. Nordenson

  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Concept, geometrical intrepretation, mathematical background, algorithms, history

    Kim Esbensen;Paul Geladi

  • On‐line near infrared monitoring of glycerol‐boosted anaerobic digestion processes: Evaluation of process analytical technologies

    Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen;Carina Juel Lomborg;Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel;Kim H. Esbensen

  • Source contributions to ambient aerosol calculated by discriminat partial least squares regression (PLS)

    Richard Vong;Paul Geladi;Svante Wold;Kim Esbensen

  • Regression on multivariate images: Principal component regression for modeling, prediction and visual diagnostic tools

    Paul Geladi;Kim Esbensen

  • Acoustic chemometric monitoring of an industrial granulation production process : a PAT feasibility study

    Maths Halstensen;Peter de Bakker;Kim H. Esbensen;Kim H. Esbensen

  • In situ carbon and nitrogen dynamics in ryegrass-clover mixtures: Transfers, deposition and leaching

    Jim Rasmussen;Jørgen Eriksen;Erik Steen Jensen;Kim H. Esbensen

  • Process Sampling (Theory of Sampling, TOS) - the Missing Link in Process Analytical Technology (PAT)

    Kim H. Esbensen;Peter Paasch‐Mortensen

  • Fermentation monitoring using multisensor systems: feasibility study of the electronic tongue.

    Kim Esbensen;Dmitry Kirsanov;Andrey Legin;Alisa Rudnitskaya

  • Near infrared and acoustic chemometrics monitoring of volatile fatty acids and dry matter during co-digestion of manure and maize silage.

    Carina Juhl Lomborg;Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen;Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel;Kim Esbensen

  • Representative process sampling for reliable data analysis—a tutorial

    Lars Petersen;Kim H. Esbensen

  • The start and early history of chemometrics: Selected interviews. Part 1

    Paul Geladi;Kim Esbensen

  • Systematic compositional variations in the Cape York iron meteorite

    Kim H. Esbensen;Kim H. Esbensen;Vagn F. Buchwald;Dan J. Malvin;John T. Wasson

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Geladi
Paul Geladi Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Svante Wold
Svante Wold Umeå University
Desire L. Massart
Desire L. Massart Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Erik Steen Jensen
Erik Steen Jensen Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg Technical University of Denmark
Philip John Binning
Philip John Binning Technical University of Denmark
Michael W. Vannier
Michael W. Vannier University of Chicago
John T. Wasson
John T. Wasson University of California, Los Angeles
Sarah-Jane Barnes
Sarah-Jane Barnes Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Eric C. Gaucher
Eric C. Gaucher Total (France)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA can open the doors to versatile careers—and online education is making these opportunities even more accessible. Many students, including working professionals and parents, are looking for flexible learning formats. Programs such as the best online degrees for moms are designed to support learners balancing education with family or job responsibilities.

If you want to upskill quickly, consider colleges offering 6 week courses that let you earn credits in a short timeframe. For those interested in further specializing, programs like a finance degree online can complement technical skills with business acumen, enhancing your career prospects in the technology sector.

Some students may seek even broader leadership roles. The accelerated mba programs usa offer a fast track to a coveted qualification, equipping graduates for managerial and executive positions in tech companies. With so many tailored online pathways, you can customize your educational journey to fit your evolving career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kim H. Esbensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles