World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5800 5384 2750 2508 87 10535

Richard I. Parker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard I. Parker between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard I. Parker published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 2 of the 92 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1987 2024

92 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard I. Parker: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 5
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 5
2004 1
2005 1
2006 6
2007 6
2008 4
2009 7
2010 2
2011 7
2012 5
2013 12
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 92
Download as CSV

Richard I. Parker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 87 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 87
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard I. Parker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard I. Parker is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the field of Medicine. Their subfields of study include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology, Economics and Econometrics, and Infectious Diseases.

Their recent publications illustrate a varied research portfolio, including works on the effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke and the broader impacts of HIV/AIDS. Two notable papers include:

  • Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy After Stroke Caused by Intracerebral Hemorrhage, published in 2021 in JAMA Neurology
  • AIDS Crisis and Brazil, published in 2020 in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History

The main topics that Richard I. Parker's work addresses are:

  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Frequent co-authors of Parker include Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Martin Dennis, Peter Sandercock, Cathie Sudlow, and Joanna M. Wardlaw. These collaborations reflect the interdisciplinary and clinical focus of many of their research projects.

Richard I. Parker's publications have appeared in venues such as JAMA Neurology and the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History, reflecting the cross-disciplinary nature of their work.

In addition to journal articles, Parker has published books through established academic publishers. Titles include "Remaking HIV Prevention in the 21st Century," released by Springer International Publishing in 2021, and "Attachment Aware Schools," published by Palgrave Studies in Alternative Education in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U.

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis;Stephanie B. Sauber

  • An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest

  • Effect Size in Single-Case Research: A Review of Nine Nonoverlap Techniques

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis

  • Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND) An Alternative to PND

    Richard I. Parker;Shanna Hagan-Burke;Kimberly Vannest

  • The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;Leanne Brown

  • A Meta-Analysis of Single Case Research Studies on Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

    Jennifer B. Ganz;Theresa L. Earles-Vollrath;Amy K. Heath;Richard I. Parker

  • Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research.

    Lisa Bowman-Perrott;Heather Davis;Kimberly Vannest;Lauren Williams

  • The Relationship Between Visual Analysis and Five Statistical Analyses in a Simple AB Single-Case Research Design:

    Daniel F. Brossart;Richard I. Parker;Elizabeth A. Olson;Lakshmi Mahadevan

  • Useful effect size interpretations for single case research.

    Richard I. Parker;Shanna Hagan-Burke

  • Praise Counts: Using Self-Monitoring to Increase Effective Teaching Practices

    Tara M. Kalis;Kimberly J. Vannest;Rich Parker

  • Effects of Two Tutoring Programs on the English Reading Development of Spanish-English Bilingual Students

    Carolyn A. Denton;Jason L. Anthony;Richard Parker;Jan E. Hasbrouck

  • Evaluating Single-Case Research Data: A Comparison of Seven Statistical Methods

    Richard I. Parker;Daniel F. Brossart

  • Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large Is Large?

    Richard I. Parker;Daniel F. Brossart;Kimberly J. Vannest;James R. Long

  • Bottom-Up Analysis of Single-Case Research Designs

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest

  • Assessment of Written Expression for Students in Compensatory and Special Education Programs

    Gerald Tindal;Richard Parker

  • Predictive Validity of Early Literacy Indicators From the Middle of Kindergarten to Second Grade

    Mack D. Burke;Shanna Hagan-Burke;Oiman Kwok;Richard Parker

  • Controlling Baseline Trend in Single-Case Research.

    Richard I. Parker;Judy Cryer;Glenda Byrns

  • Moderating factors of video-modeling with other as model: a meta-analysis of single-case studies.

    Rose A. Mason;Jennifer B. Ganz;Richard I. Parker;Mack D. Burke

  • An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders

    Jennifer B. Ganz;Theresa L. Earles-Vollrath;Rose A. Mason;Mandy J. Rispoli

  • Non-overlap analysis for single-case research.

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis

  • Process Versus Product Writing with Limited English Proficient Students

    Richard Gomez;Richard Parker;Rafael Lara-Alecio;Leo Gomez

  • Impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on Communication and Collateral Effects on Maladaptive Behaviors

    Jennifer B Ganz;Richard Parker;Joanne Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly J. Vannest
Kimberly J. Vannest Texas A&M University
Jennifer B. Ganz
Jennifer B. Ganz Texas A&M University
Gerald Tindal
Gerald Tindal University of Oregon
Carolyn A. Denton
Carolyn A. Denton The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Mandy Rispoli
Mandy Rispoli University of Virginia
Edward J. Kameenui
Edward J. Kameenui University of Oregon
Timothy R. Elliott
Timothy R. Elliott Texas A&M University
Howard Goldstein
Howard Goldstein University of South Florida
Oi-Man Kwok
Oi-Man Kwok Texas A&M University
Bob Algozzine
Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of impactful careers. Many students now pursue these fields through flexible and accessible online programs, with high-quality options spanning areas such as counseling, psychology, and social work.

For those interested in mental health professions, cacrep accredited online counseling programs offer essential training for licensure and professional growth. Aspiring therapists may also consider marriage and family therapy certification online, which provides a specialized pathway toward helping families and couples navigate complex issues.

If you are drawn to understanding human behavior and research, pursuing an affordable online psychology degree can build a strong foundation for various career choices, including counseling, education, and organizational roles. Additionally, those passionate about social change and advocacy may find that msw programs (Master of Social Work) equip them for leadership positions in social services and community development.

Online options make it easier than ever to advance your career in these rewarding fields—while balancing work, life, and studies.

Best Scientists Citing Richard I. Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles