World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5322 4936 2517 2291 114 7809

David McNaughton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David McNaughton between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David McNaughton published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 6 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1989 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David McNaughton: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 2
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 4
2008 6
2009 3
2010 6
2011 1
2012 3
2013 7
2014 3
2015 5
2016 3
2017 2
2018 9
2019 11
2020 8
2021 11
2022 2
2023 5
2024 1
2025 5
Total 125
Download as CSV

David McNaughton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David McNaughton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 114
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David McNaughton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David McNaughton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

David McNaughton is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within social sciences and health professions, with a particular emphasis on assistive technology and communication for individuals with disabilities.

The main fields of study for McNaughton include Social Sciences and Health Professions. More specifically, their work engages with several subfields such as Occupational Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Safety Research, and Clinical Psychology.

The primary topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies

McNaughton has contributed to a variety of journals. Notably frequent publication venues include:

  • Utilitas
  • Augmentative and Alternative Communication
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
  • Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Janice Light
  • Dale E. Miller
  • Brad Hooker
  • Paul Kelly
  • Philip Schofield

Recent representative papers authored by McNaughton cover topics in communication technology and intervention for individuals with complex communication needs and autism spectrum disorder. Selected publications include:

  • "Using AAC video visual scene displays to increase participation and communication within a volunteer activity for adolescents with complex communication needs" (2020, Augmentative and Alternative Communication)
  • "The effects of AAC video visual scene display technology on the communicative turns of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder" (2021, Assistive Technology)
  • ""Two Friends Spending Time Together": The Impact of Video Visual Scene Displays on Peer Social Interaction for Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder" (2021, Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools)
  • "Effects of an AAC App with Transition to Literacy Features on Single-Word Reading of Individuals with Complex Communication Needs" (2020, Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities)
  • "Personalized AAC Intervention to Increase Participation and Communication for a Young Adult With Down Syndrome" (2021, Topics in Language Disorders)

Best Publications

  • The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication

    David McNaughton;Janice Light

  • Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication?

    Janice Light;David McNaughton

  • Communication Partner Instruction in AAC: Present Practices and Future Directions

    Jennifer Kent-Walsh;David Mcnaughton

  • Supporting the Communication, Language, and Literacy Development of Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Priorities

    Janice Light;David McNaughton

  • The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges

    Janice Light;David McNaughton

  • “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies

    David McNaughton;Tracy Rackensperger;Elizabeth Benedek-Wood;Carole Krezman

  • Designing AAC Research and Intervention to Improve Outcomes for Individuals with Complex Communication Needs

    Janice Light;David Mcnaughton

  • Measuring Parent Satisfaction with Early Childhood Intervention Programs

    David McNaughton

  • New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions.

    Janice Light;David McNaughton;Jessica Caron

  • Learning to Listen: Teaching an Active Listening Strategy to Preservice Education Professionals

    David McNaughton;Dawn Hamlin;John McCarthy;Darlene Head-Reeves

  • Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention.

    Janice Light;David McNaughton

  • "All children can and should have the opportunity to learn": general education teachers' perspectives on including children with autism spectrum disorder who require AAC.

    Erinn H. Finke;David B. McNaughton;Kathryn D. R. Drager

  • AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC

    David McNaughton;Diane Nelson Bryen

  • AAC Modeling Intervention Research Review

    Samuel C. Sennott;Janice C. Light;David McNaughton

  • Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs

    Kathryn Drager;Janice Light;David McNaughton

  • Challenges and opportunities in augmentative and alternative communication: Research and technology development to enhance communication and participation for individuals with complex communication needs.

    Janice Light;David McNaughton;David Beukelman;Susan Koch Fager

  • "When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff": The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC.

    Tracy Rackensperger;Carole Krezman;David Mcnaughton;Michael B. Williams

  • ‘Getting your wheel in the door’: successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

    David McNaughton;Janice Light;Kara B. Arnold

  • “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

    John Dattilo;Gus Estrella;Laura J Estrella;Janice Light

  • “Reach for the Stars”: Five Principles for the Next 25 Years of AAC

    Michael B. Williams;Carole Krezman;David McNaughton

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Scheffner Hammer
Carol Scheffner Hammer Columbia University
Susan Balandin
Susan Balandin Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities? There are many flexible, high-impact online degrees that can help you launch or advance your career. One popular choice is pursuing the cacrep accredited counseling programs, which are known for meeting rigorous professional standards and can lead to licensure in counseling.

If you are interested in supporting families and couples, an marriage and family therapist degree might be the perfect fit. This path prepares graduates for specialized therapy roles, which are in growing demand across the United States.

Looking for a broader approach? There are many affordable online psychology degrees that can open doors to roles in mental health, education, business, and research. Psychology is a versatile field with options for further specialization or study.

For those passionate about social change, exploring masters in social work programs can lead directly to impactful positions in community organizations, healthcare, and government services.

Best Scientists Citing David McNaughton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles