World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roger J. Stancliffe

Roger J. Stancliffe

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
9408
World Ranking
5256
National Ranking
302

Roger J. Stancliffe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger J. Stancliffe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Roger J. Stancliffe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger J. Stancliffe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger J. Stancliffe is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has focused their research primarily within the social sciences and medicine. Their work addresses a range of topics related to disability, health disparities, employment, and well-being, reflecting extensive engagement with public health and social support structures.

Their research spans various dedicated subfields including safety research, demography, general health professions, and public health, environmental and occupational health. The main areas of interest encompass health disparities and outcomes, down syndrome and intellectual disability research, disability education and employment, employment and welfare studies, retirement, disability, and employment, family and disability support research, as well as healthcare innovation and challenges.

Stancliffe has published extensively in journals such as:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • Disability and Health Journal
  • BMC Public Health
  • Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Gwynnyth Llewellyn
  • Eric Emerson
  • Nicola Fortune
  • Hannah Badland
  • Zoe Aitken

Stancliffe's recent papers highlight critical issues in disability and well-being. Notable works include:

  • "Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study," 2020, Disability and Health Journal
  • "The impact of disability on employment and financial security following the outbreak of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in the UK," 2020, Journal of Public Health
  • "The wellbeing of working-age adults with and without disability in the UK: Associations with age, gender, ethnicity, partnership status, educational attainment and employment status," 2020, Disability and Health Journal
  • "Health and healthcare for people with disabilities in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2021, Disability and Health Journal
  • "Disability, Loneliness and Health in the UK: cross-sectional survey," 2021, European Journal of Public Health

Best Publications

  • Quality of life and its measurement: important principles and guidelines.

    Miguel A. Verdugo;R. L. Schalock;K. D. Keith;R. J. Stancliffe;R. J. Stancliffe

  • Social Inclusion and Community Participation of Individuals with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities

    Angela Novak Amado;Roger J. Stancliffe;Mary McCarron;Philip McCallion

  • Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross sectional study.

    Eric Emerson;Eric Emerson;Nicola Fortune;Gwynnyth Llewellyn;Roger Stancliffe

  • Personal Control and the Ecology of Community Living Settings: Beyond Living-Unit Size and Type

    Roger J. Stancliffe;Brian H. Abery;John Smith

  • 'I Get by with a little help from my friends': Adults with intellectual disability discuss loneliness

    Keith R. McVilly;Roger J. Stancliffe;Trevor R. Parmenter;Rosanne M. Burton-Smith

  • The mental health of young children with intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning

    Eric Emerson;Eric Emerson;Stewart Einfeld;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, and Australia

    David Braddock;Eric Emerson;David John Felce;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • The ecology of self-determination

    Brian H. Abery;R. Stancliffe

  • Living with support in the community: Predictors of choice and self-determination

    Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism

    David Trembath;Susan Balandin;Leanne Togher;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Assessing opportunities for choice-making: a comparison of self- and staff reports.

    Stancliffe Rj

  • Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Empowerment factor.

    R. J. Stancliffe

  • Overweight and Obesity among Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Who Use Intellectual Disability/Developmental Disability Services in 20 U.S. States.

    Roger J. Stancliffe;K. Charlie Lakin;Sheryl A Larson;Joshua Engler

  • Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice

    Roger J. Stancliffe;Brian H. Abery

  • Issues Concerning Self-Report Data and Population-Based Data Sets Involving People With Intellectual Disabilities

    Eric Emerson;David John Felce;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Proxy respondents and quality of life

    Roger J Stancliffe

  • Incidence of and Risk Factors for Falls among Adults with an Intellectual Disability.

    C. R. Cox;L. Clemson;R. J. Stancliffe;S. Durvasula

  • Self‐advocates have the last say on friendship†

    Keith R. McVilly;Roger J. Stancliffe;Trevor R. Parmenter;Rosanne M. Burton‐Smith

  • Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation

    Roger Stancliffe;Michael L. Wehmeyer

  • Analysis of Expenditures and Outcomes of Residential Alternatives for Persons with Developmental Disabilities.

    Stancliffe Rj;Lakin Kc

  • 'I Get by with a Little Help from my Friends': Adults with Intellectual Disability Discuss

    Keith R. McVilly;Roger J. Stancliffe;Trevor R. Parmenter;Rosanne M. Burton-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Balandin
Susan Balandin Deakin University
Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson Lancaster University
Christine Bigby
Christine Bigby La Trobe University
Gwynnyth Llewellyn
Gwynnyth Llewellyn University of Sydney
Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher University of Sydney
David Trembath
David Trembath Griffith University
Stewart L. Einfeld
Stewart L. Einfeld University of Sydney
Hannah Badland
Hannah Badland RMIT University
Philip McCallion
Philip McCallion Temple University
Lindy Clemson
Lindy Clemson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Psychology, there are a variety of online degrees and specialized career paths to consider. One growing field is marriage and family therapy, which offers rewarding opportunities and flexibility in work settings.

Requirements to become an MFT (Marriage and Family Therapist) may vary by location. For example, read about how to become an mft in Austin, where specific academic credentials, supervised clinical hours, and licensure exams are needed. In California, learn more about how to become an mft in Bakersfield for a look at tailored state requirements.

Prospective therapists should also review the regulations in other areas, such as understanding how to become an mft in Baltimore or seeing the mft requirements in Boise. Exploring these pathways can help you map out the right educational route and make informed decisions about your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Roger J. Stancliffe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles