World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7594 7296 2704 2514 122 9325

Annmarie G. Carlton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annmarie G. Carlton between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annmarie G. Carlton published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2023. 15 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2023. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 12 publications
1999 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annmarie G. Carlton: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 4
2009 6
2010 10
2011 8
2012 4
2013 8
2014 7
2015 9
2016 9
2017 12
2018 4
2019 8
2020 9
2021 13
2022 4
2023 15
2024 3
2025 12
Total 154
Download as CSV

Annmarie G. Carlton publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annmarie G. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 122 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 122
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Annmarie G. Carlton D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annmarie G. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Annmarie G. Carlton is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a notable concentration on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist has contributed to several key topics within these areas, including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models

Annmarie G. Carlton has been active in publishing research in multiple respected venues. Frequent publication sources include:

  • Reviews of Geophysics
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate a breadth of work in modeling atmospheric and chemical processes. Selected recent publications are:

  • "The Fire Inventory from NCAR version 2.5: an updated global fire emissions model for climate and chemistry applications", 2023, Geoscientific model development
  • "Multiphase Atmospheric Chemistry in Liquid Water: Impacts and Controllability of Organic Aerosol", 2020, Accounts of Chemical Research
  • "Box Model Intercomparison of Cloud Chemistry", 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Diurnal and Seasonal Variations in the Phase State of Secondary Organic Aerosol Material over the Contiguous US Simulated in CMAQ", 2021, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • "RMechDB: A Public Database of Elementary Radical Reaction Steps", 2023, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Collaboration is a notable element of Annmarie G. Carlton's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Christopher J. Hennigan
  • Amy Christiansen
  • Yin Ting T. Chiu
  • Fabio Florindo
  • Paolo D'Odorico

This collaborative network aligns with the scientist's multidisciplinary approach to atmospheric and environmental sciences, integrating chemistry, modeling, and environmental impacts across multiple research dimensions.

Best Publications

  • A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene

    A. G. Carlton;C. Wiedinmyer;J. H. Kroll

  • Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Barbara Jo Turpin;Katye E. Altieri;Sybil Seitzinger

  • Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States

    H. Guo;L. Xu;A. Bougiatioti;A. Bougiatioti;K. M. Cerully

  • Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7

    Annmarie G Carlton;Prakash V Bhave;Sergey L Napelenok;Edward O Edney

  • Isoprene forms secondary organic aerosol through cloud processing: model simulations.

    † Ho-Jin Lim;and Annmarie G. Carlton;Barbara J. Turpin

  • Link between isoprene and secondary organic aerosol (SOA): Pyruvic acid oxidation yields low volatility organic acids in clouds

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Barbara J. Turpin;Ho Jin Lim;Katye E. Altieri

  • Oligomers formed through in-cloud methylglyoxal reactions: Chemical composition, properties, and mechanisms investigated by ultra-high resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry

    K.E. Altieri;S.P. Seitzinger;A.G. Carlton;B.J. Turpin

  • To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Robert W. Pinder;Prakash V. Bhave;George A. Pouliot

  • Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud-processing of isoprene oxidation products

    Barbara Ervens;Barbara Ervens;Annmarie G. Carlton;Barbara J. Turpin;Katye E. Altieri

  • On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass

    Havala O. T. Pye;Benjamin N. Murphy;Lu Xu;Nga L. Ng

  • CMAQ model performance enhanced when in-cloud secondary organic aerosol is included: comparisons of organic carbon predictions with measurements.

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Barbara Jo Turpin;Katye E. Altieri;Sybil P. Seitzinger

  • Particle partitioning potential of organic compounds is highest in the Eastern US and driven by anthropogenic water

    A. G. Carlton;B. J. Turpin

  • SOA from methylglyoxal in clouds and wet aerosols: Measurement and prediction of key products

    Yi Tan;Annmarie G. Carlton;Sybil P. Seitzinger;Barbara J. Turpin

  • Evidence for oligomer formation in clouds: reactions of isoprene oxidation products.

    Katye E. Altieri;Annmarie G. Carlton;Ho Jin Lim;Barbara J. Turpin

  • Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010

    P. L. Hayes;P. L. Hayes;P. L. Hayes;A. G. Carlton;K. R. Baker;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov

  • Liquid water: Ubiquitous contributor to aerosol mass

    Thien Khoi V. Nguyen;Qi Zhang;Jose L. Jimenez;Maxwell Pike

  • The Fire Inventory from NCAR version 2.5: an updated global fire emissions model for climate and chemistry applications

    Unknown

  • Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning

    Benjamin N. Murphy;Matthew C. Woody;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez;Ann Marie G. Carlton

  • Photochemical Modeling of the Ozark Isoprene Volcano: MEGAN, BEIS, and Their Impacts on Air Quality Predictions

    Annmarie G Carlton;Kirk R Baker

  • Aerosol liquid water driven by anthropogenic nitrate: implications for lifetimes of water-soluble organic gases and potential for secondary organic aerosol formation.

    Natasha Hodas;Amy P. Sullivan;Kate Skog;Frank N. Keutsch

  • Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols during CalNex 2010

    P. L. Hayes;A. G. Carlton;K. R. Baker;R. Ahmadov

  • Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth

    Charles A. Brock;Nicholas L. Wagner;Nicholas L. Wagner;Bruce E. Anderson;Alexis R. Attwood;Alexis R. Attwood

  • The essential role for laboratory studies in atmospheric chemistry

    James B. Burkholder;Jonathan P. D. Abbatt;Ian Barnes;James M. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara J. Turpin
Barbara J. Turpin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Kirk R. Baker
Kirk R. Baker Environmental Protection Agency
Havala O. T. Pye
Havala O. T. Pye Environmental Protection Agency
Rebecca A. Washenfelder
Rebecca A. Washenfelder National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Christopher J. Hennigan
Christopher J. Hennigan University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Sybil P. Seitzinger
Sybil P. Seitzinger University of Victoria
Jason D. Surratt
Jason D. Surratt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert W. Pinder
Robert W. Pinder Environmental Protection Agency
Barbara Ervens
Barbara Ervens University of Clermont Auvergne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA but seeking flexible options, exploring online general studies degree affordable programs can be a practical choice. These programs often provide a solid foundation with a broad curriculum, allowing students to tailor their focus toward environmental topics while managing costs effectively.

Many students also consider pursuing one of the easiest degree to get options when aiming for a quick and manageable pathway into environmental fields. While some may perceive “easy” degrees as less rigorous, these programs can still offer valuable skills applicable to various environmental careers.

Specifically, an geology degree online stands out as a focused discipline within environmental sciences, emphasizing earth processes and sustainability. Online geology degrees provide comprehensive knowledge and practical skills ideal for careers in resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

For advanced specialization, many professionals opt for top gis masters programs to enhance expertise in spatial data analysis. GIS skills are increasingly critical in environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster management, offering dynamic career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Annmarie G. Carlton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles