World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
6915
World Ranking
8560
National Ranking
3061

Robert W. Pinder publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Pinder sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert W. Pinder D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Pinder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Pinder is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with key contributions spanning environmental engineering, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and global and planetary change.

Their work has been published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, among other venues.

Recent scholarly output includes the paper titled Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+ Years of Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring in Accra, Ghana, published in 2023 in Environmental Science & Technology. This study has drawn attention with numerous citations within the scientific community.

Their coauthors frequently include Garima Raheja, James Nimo, Emmanuel K-E Appoh, Benjamin Essien, and M.Pd. I Gst. Ketut Arya Sunu.

Research topics consistently addressed by Robert W. Pinder encompass:

  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality

The scientist's work integrates multiple sub-disciplines within environmental science, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying air quality issues and their health-related effects.

Best Publications

  • Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7

    Annmarie G Carlton;Prakash V Bhave;Sergey L Napelenok;Edward O Edney

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability

    David G. Streets;Timothy Canty;Gregory R. Carmichael;Benjamin de Foy

  • Ammonia Emissions in the United States, European Union, and China Derived by High-Resolution Inversion of Ammonium Wet Deposition Data: Interpretation with a New Agricultural Emissions Inventory (MASAGE_NH3)

    F. Paulot;Daniel James Jacob;R. W. Pinder;J. O. Bash

  • To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Robert W. Pinder;Prakash V. Bhave;George A. Pouliot

  • Ammonia Emission Controls as a Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Atmospheric Particulate Matter in the Eastern United States

    Robert W. Pinder;Peter J. Adams;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Epoxide pathways improve model predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol formation.

    Havala O T Pye;Robert W. Pinder;Ivan R. Piletic;Ying Xie

  • Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY and OMI Tropospheric NO2 Columns: Observing the Diurnal Evolution of Chemistry and Emissions from Space

    K. Folkert Boersma;K. Folkert Boersma;Daniel J. Jacob;Henk J. Eskes;Robert W. Pinder

  • Reactive nitrogen in atmospheric emission inventories

    S. Reis;R. W. Pinder;M. Zhang;G. Lijie

  • Excess Nitrogen in the U.S. Environment: Trends, Risks, and Solutions

    E.A. Davidson;M.B. David;J.N. Galloway;C.L. Goodale

  • Climate change impacts of US reactive nitrogen

    Robert W. Pinder;Eric A. Davidson;Christine L. Goodale;Tara L. Greaver

  • Environmental impact of atmospheric NH3 emissions under present and future conditions in the eastern United States

    R. W. Pinder;A. B. Gilliland;R. L. Dennis

  • Constraining U.S. ammonia emissions using TES remote sensing observations and the GEOS‐Chem adjoint model

    L. Zhu;D. K. Henze;K. E. Cady-Pereira;M. W. Shephard

  • TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia

    M.W Shephard;K.E Cady-Pereira;M. Luo;D.K Henze

  • Understanding the impact of recent advances in isoprene photooxidation on simulations of regional air quality

    Y. Xie;F. Paulot;F. Paulot;W. P. L. Carter;C. G. Nolte

  • Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: Assessing changes in O3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology

    Alice B. Gilliland;Christian Hogrefe;Robert W. Pinder;James M. Godowitch

  • Seasonal NH3 emissions for the continental united states: Inverse model estimation and evaluation

    Alice B. Gilliland;K. Wyat Appel;Robert W. Pinder;Robin L. Dennis

  • A process-based model of ammonia emissions from dairy cows: improved temporal and spatial resolution

    Robert W. Pinder;Natalie J. Pekney;Cliff I. Davidson;Peter J. Adams

  • Impact of lightning-NO on eastern United States photochemistry during the summer of 2006 as determined using the CMAQ model

    D. J. Allen;K. E. Pickering;R. W. Pinder;B. H. Henderson

  • A multi-resolution assessment of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v4.7 wet deposition estimates for 2002–2006

    K. W. Appel;K. M. Foley;J. O. Bash;R. W. Pinder

  • Temporally resolved ammonia emission inventories: Current estimates, evaluation tools, and measurement needs

    Robert W. Pinder;Peter J. Adams;Spyros N. Pandis;Alice B. Gilliland

Frequent Co-Authors

Daven K. Henze
Daven K. Henze University of Colorado Boulder
Jesse O. Bash
Jesse O. Bash Environmental Protection Agency
Karen Cady-Pereira
Karen Cady-Pereira Atmospheric and Environmental Research
Mark W. Shephard
Mark W. Shephard Environment and Climate Change Canada
John T. Walker
John T. Walker Environmental Protection Agency
Annmarie G. Carlton
Annmarie G. Carlton University of California, Irvine
Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Robin L. Dennis
Robin L. Dennis Environmental Protection Agency
Charles O. Stanier
Charles O. Stanier University of Iowa
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with public administration, social sciences, and education. For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy or nonprofit management, pursuing online MPA degrees can provide crucial administrative and policy-making skills in a short timeframe.

Alternatively, combining environmental studies with a strong understanding of societal dynamics is valuable. One can explore programs like the best online bachelors in sociology programs to build expertise in social behavior, which is essential for community-focused environmental initiatives.

Educators looking to specialize further may consider advanced degrees that emphasize flexibility. For example, 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation offer accelerated paths to doctorate-level credentials without the traditional dissertation, making it easier to balance studies with work.

For educators already holding advanced degrees, transitioning into leadership roles with eds to edd programs online provides an efficient way to deepen expertise and impact educational policy and administration related to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Pinder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles