World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
8159
World Ranking
6452
National Ranking
2804

Damien D. Pearse publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damien D. Pearse sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 109 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Damien D. Pearse D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damien D. Pearse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Damien D. Pearse is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and has a research focus spanning multiple fields within medicine and molecular biology. Their work primarily addresses neurological conditions, with particular attention to spinal cord injury and related neurodegenerative disorders.

The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Within these broader areas, Pearse's subfields of research explore Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, and Genetics.

Research topics covered by Pearse notably involve spinal cord injury research, extracellular vesicles in disease, nerve injury and regeneration, circular RNAs in diseases, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research, as well as neurogenetic and muscular disorders research.

Several recent publications illustrate Pearse's contributions to these topics:

  • "Phase 1 Safety Trial of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury," 2021, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Schwann Cell-Derived Exosomal Vesicles: A Promising Therapy for the Injured Spinal Cord," 2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "The Yin and Yang of Microglia-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in CNS Injury and Diseases," 2024, Cells
  • "Treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with allogeneic Schwann cell-derived exosomal vesicles: a case report," 2024, Neural Regeneration Research
  • "Sex Dependent Disparities in the Central Innate Immune Response after Moderate Spinal Cord Contusion in Rat," 2024, Cells

Pearse often collaborates with other researchers who are frequent co-authors, including Mousumi Ghosh, W. Dalton Dietrich, James D. Guest, Aisha Khan, and Allan D. Levi.

Publication venues where Pearse frequently publishes include:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cells
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Neural Regeneration Research
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine

Best Publications

  • cAMP and Schwann cells promote axonal growth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury

    Damien P. Pearse;Francisco Carlos Pereira;Alexander E. Marcillo;Margaret L. Bates

  • Combining Schwann Cell Bridges and Olfactory-Ensheathing Glia Grafts with Chondroitinase Promotes Locomotor Recovery after Complete Transection of the Spinal Cord

    Karim Fouad;Lisa Schnell;Lisa Schnell;Mary B. Bunge;Martin E. Schwab;Martin E. Schwab

  • Transplantation of Schwann cells and/or olfactory ensheathing glia into the contused spinal cord: Survival, migration, axon association, and functional recovery.

    Damien Daniel Pearse;Andre R. Sanchez;Francisco C. Pereira;Christian M. Andrade

  • Specific pathophysiological functions of JNK isoforms in the brain.

    Stephan Brecht;Rainer Kirchhof;Ansgar Chromik;Mette Willesen

  • Safety of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Subacute Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.

    Kim D. Anderson;James D. Guest;W. Dalton Dietrich;Mary Bartlett Bunge

  • Cyclic AMP is a key regulator of M1 to M2a phenotypic conversion of microglia in the presence of Th2 cytokines.

    Mousumi Ghosh;Yong Xu;Damien D. Pearse

  • Combination of Engineered Schwann Cell Grafts to Secrete Neurotrophin and Chondroitinase Promotes Axonal Regeneration and Locomotion after Spinal Cord Injury

    Haruo Kanno;Yelena Pressman;Alison Moody;Randall Berg

  • Survival, integration, and axon growth support of glia transplanted into the chronically contused spinal cord.

    D. J. Barakat;S. M. Gaglani;S. R. Neravetla;A. R. Sanchez

  • Critical data-based re-evaluation of minocycline as a putative specific microglia inhibitor.

    Thomas Moller;Frederique Bard;Anindya Bhattacharya;Knut Biber

  • Histopathological and behavioral characterization of a novel cervical spinal cord displacement contusion injury in the rat.

    Damien Daniel Pearse;T. P. Lo;K. S. Cho;M. P. Lynch

  • Modulation of the cAMP signaling pathway after traumatic brain injury.

    Coleen M. Atkins;Anthony A. Oliva;Ofelia F. Alonso;Damien D. Pearse

  • Transplantation strategies to promote repair of the injured spinal cord.

    Mary Bartlett Bunge;Damien D. Pearse

  • Transplantation of Schwann cells and olfactory ensheathing glia after spinal cord injury: does pretreatment with methylprednisolone and interleukin-10 enhance recovery?

    Damien Daniel Pearse;Alexander Eduardo Marcillo;Martin Oudega;Michael Paul Lynch

  • Transduced Schwann cells promote axon growth and myelination after spinal cord injury.

    Kevin L. Golden;Damien D. Pearse;Bas Blits;Maneesh S. Garg

  • Schwann cell transplantation for spinal cord injury repair: its significant therapeutic potential and prospectus

    Haruo Kanno;Haruo Kanno;Damien D. Pearse;Hiroshi Ozawa;Eiji Itoi

  • Systemic hypothermia improves histological and functional outcome after cervical spinal cord contusion in rats.

    Thomas Pang Lo;Kyoung Suok Cho;Maneesh Sen Garg;Michael Patrick Lynch

  • Transgenic inhibition of astroglial NF-κB leads to increased axonal sparing and sprouting following spinal cord injury

    Roberta Brambilla;Andres Hurtado;Trikaldarshi Persaud;Kim Esham

  • The role of the serotonergic system in locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury.

    Mousumi Ghosh;Damien D. Pearse

  • Designing cell- and gene-based regeneration strategies to repair the injured spinal cord.

    Damien Daniel Pearse;M. B. Bunge

  • Up-regulation of glomerular COX-2 by angiotensin II: Role of reactive oxygen species

    Edgar A. Jaimes;Run Xia Tian;Damien Pearse;Leopoldo Raij

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Bartlett Bunge
Mary Bartlett Bunge University of Miami
W. Dalton Dietrich
W. Dalton Dietrich University of Miami
John R. Bethea
John R. Bethea George Washington University
Patrick M. Wood
Patrick M. Wood University of Miami
Karim Fouad
Karim Fouad University of Alberta
Martin E. Schwab
Martin E. Schwab University of Zurich
Lisa Schnell
Lisa Schnell University of Zurich
Lorne M. Mendell
Lorne M. Mendell Stony Brook University
Warren W. Wakarchuk
Warren W. Wakarchuk University of Alberta
Paul D. Dalton
Paul D. Dalton University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Damien D. Pearse

Trending Scientists