World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark W. Rosenberg

Mark W. Rosenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5115 4747 305 293 214 6024

Mark W. Rosenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Rosenberg between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Rosenberg published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 14 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 3 publications
1974 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Rosenberg: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 5
1995 5
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 3
2000 6
2001 6
2002 4
2003 1
2004 1
2005 6
2006 8
2007 8
2008 13
2009 12
2010 7
2011 13
2012 6
2013 6
2014 11
2015 1
2016 7
2017 14
2018 9
2019 6
2020 12
2021 21
2022 16
2023 9
2024 11
2025 3
Total 256
Download as CSV

Mark W. Rosenberg publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 214 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 214
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Rosenberg D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark W. Rosenberg is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences and health professions, with particular focus on aging, health disparities, and global health issues.

The main fields of study for Rosenberg include Social Sciences and Health Professions. Within these, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, and Transportation.

The primary topics addressed in their work cover several areas:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Their publication record includes contributions to various journals and venues, notably:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
  • Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes
  • Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
  • UNC Libraries

Rosenberg has coauthored work with several researchers, including:

  • Prince M. Amegbor
  • Joseph Asumah Braimah
  • Yang Cheng
  • Clive E. Sabel
  • Lindsay Herman

Selected recent papers authored under Rosenberg's influence include:

  • "They Do Not Care about Us Anymore": Understanding the Situation of Older People in Ghana (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • 'Where is the space for continuum?' Gyms and the visceral "stickiness" of binary gender (2020), Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health
  • Effect of cognitive and structural social capital on depression among older adults in Ghana: A multilevel cross-sectional analysis (2020), Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
  • Creating therapeutic spaces for the public: elderly exercisers as leaders in urban China (2021), Urban Geography
  • Social Frailty and Depression Among Older Adults in Ghana: Insights from the WHO SAGE Surveys (2020), Research on Aging

Best Publications

  • Narrative analysis as a strategy for understanding interview talk in geographic research

    Janine L Wiles;Mark W Rosenberg;Robin A Kearns

  • Exploring the determinants of health for First Nations peoples in Canada: can existing frameworks accommodate traditional activities?

    Kathleen Wilson;Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Planning for aging populations: inside or outside the walls

    M Rosenberg;J Everitt

  • ‘Gentle caring experience’: Seeking alternative health care in Canada

    Janine Wiles;Mark W Rosenberg

  • Ethnicity and utilization of family physicians: a case study of Mainland Chinese immigrants in Toronto, Canada.

    Lu Wang;Mark Rosenberg;Lucia Lo

  • Aging, health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing, China

    Yang Cheng;Mark W. Rosenberg;Wuyi Wang;Linsheng Yang

  • Self-rated health and life satisfaction among Canadian adults: associations of perceived weight status versus BMI

    Katya M. Herman;Katya M. Herman;Wilma M. Hopman;Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Medical or health geography? Populations, peoples and places.

    Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Accessibility and the Canadian health care system: squaring perceptions and realities.

    Kathi Wilson;Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Growing old in Canada: demographic and geographic perspectives.

    Moore Eg;Rosenberg Mw;McGuinness D

  • The health of Canada's elderly population: current status and future implications

    M W Rosenberg;E G Moore

  • "It's gym, like g-y-m not J-i-m": Exploring the role of place in the gendering of physical activity.

    Stephanie E. Coen;Mark W. Rosenberg;Joyce Davidson

  • Getting out of the house: the challenges mothers face when their children have long-term care needs

    Nicole M. Yantzi;Mark W. Rosenberg;Patricia McKeever

  • The impacts of distance to hospital on families with a child with a chronic condition.

    Nicole Yantzi;Mark W Rosenberg;Sharon O Burke;Margaret B Harrison;Margaret B Harrison

  • Determinants of the variations in self-reported health status among recent and more established immigrants in Canada

    Rajendra Prasad Subedi;Mark Warren Rosenberg

  • Ontario's underserviced area program revisited: an indirect analysis.

    Malcolm Anderson;Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Spatial optimization of residential care facility locations in Beijing, China: maximum equity in accessibility

    Zhuolin Tao;Yang Cheng;Teqi Dai;Mark W Rosenberg

  • Access and utilization: a continuum of health service environments.

    Mark W. Rosenberg;Neil T. Hanlon

  • Physical activity, body mass index, and health-related quality of life in Canadian adults.

    Katya M. Herman;Wilma M. Hopman;Elizabeth G. Vandenkerkhof;Mark W. Rosenberg

  • Aboriginal peoples, health and healing approaches: The effects of age and place on health

    Kathi Wilson;Mark W. Rosenberg;Sylvia Abonyi

  • Gender, poverty and location: how much difference do they make in the geography of health inequalities?

    Mark W Rosenberg;Kathleen Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

David Phillips
David Phillips University of Melbourne
James R. Dunn
James R. Dunn McMaster University
Stephen A. Matthews
Stephen A. Matthews Pennsylvania State University
Janine Wiles
Janine Wiles University of Auckland
Nancy A. Ross
Nancy A. Ross Queen's University
Robin Kearns
Robin Kearns University of Auckland
John Ingram
John Ingram University of Oxford
Sarah Curtis
Sarah Curtis Durham University
Patricia Gober
Patricia Gober Arizona State University
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and rewarding career paths. Many students are now choosing flexible programs that help them balance studies with personal commitments.

For those interested in social work, an accelerated masters in social work can fast-track your career in advocacy, community engagement, or clinical practice. Psychology remains a popular choice—an online accelerated psychology degree can lead to opportunities in counseling, research, or human resources.

If clinical counseling interests you, consider programs that meet high academic standards. CACREP accredited counseling programs are widely recognized and can be a pathway to licensure. Aspiring therapists can also benefit from MFT programs, which train graduates to support individuals and families through life’s challenges.

Whether you want to advance your current role or pivot to a new field, these online degree options offer flexibility, affordability, and a strong foundation for careers in human services, research, or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Rosenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles