World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
South Africa
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
15787
World Ranking
1105
National Ranking
14

John Eyles publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Eyles sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 278 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John Eyles D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Eyles sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in South Africa Leader Award

Overview

John Eyles is affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. Their research spans multiple fields, including Health Professions, Business, Management and Accounting, and Medicine. The subfields of study they focus on include Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Speech and Hearing, and Oncology.

The scientist's work primarily addresses topics related to Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Health, psychology, and well-being, Global Maternal and Child Health, School Health and Nursing Education, Public Health Policies and Education, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, and the Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Implementing without guidelines, learning at the coalface: a case study of health promoters in an era of community health workers in South Africa, 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems
  • Health promotion capacity and institutional systems: an assessment of the South African Department of Health, 2020, Health Promotion International
  • South African men's perceptions of breast cancer: impact of gender norms on health care accessibility, 2022, Health Promotion International

The venues where John Eyles has most frequently published include:

  • Health Promotion International
  • Health Research Policy and Systems

Frequent collaborators in their work are:

  • Teurai Rwafa-Ponela
  • Nicola Christofides
  • Jane Goudge
  • Raquel Burgess
  • Brown Lekekela

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in Interview Analysis

    Jamie Baxter;John Eyles

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes

    Julia Abelson;Pierre Gerlier Forest;John Eyles;Patricia Smith

  • Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research

    Tracy Farmer;Kerry Robinson;Susan J Elliott;John Eyles

  • A GIS–Environmental Justice Analysis of Particulate Air Pollution in Hamilton, Canada:

    Michael Jerrett;Richard T Burnett;Pavlos Kanaroglou;John Eyles

  • Who you know, where you live: social capital, neighbourhood and health

    Gerry Veenstra;Isaac Luginaah;Sarah Wakefield;Stephen Birch

  • Environmental risk and (re)action: air quality, health, and civic involvement in an urban industrial neighbourhood

    Sarah E.L Wakefield;Susan J Elliott;Donald C Cole;John D Eyles

  • An empirical evaluation of an expanded Nursing Stress Scale.

    French Se;Lenton R;Walters;Eyles J

  • 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making.

    Andrea Litva;Joanna Coast;Jenny Donovan;John Eyles

  • Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.

    Julia Abelson;John Eyles;Christopher B. McLeod;Patricia Collins

  • Qualitative Methods in Human Geography

    John Eyles;David Marshall Smith

  • The Utility of In‐Depth Interviews for Studying the Meaning of Environmental Risk

    Jamie Baxter;John Eyles

  • Linking perceptions of neighbourhood to health in Hamilton, Canada

    K Wilson;S Elliott;M Law;J Eyles

  • Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study.

    Julia Abelson;Pierre Gerlier Forest;John Eyles;Ann Casebeer

  • "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.

    Francois-Pierre Gauvin;Julia Abelson;Mita Giacomini;John Eyles

  • The Geography of Everyday Life

    John Eyles

  • Reconceptualizing senses of place: social relations, ideology and ecology

    David Butz;John Eyles

  • Paid work, unpaid work and social support: A study of the health of male and female nurses

    Vivienne Walters;Rhonda Lenton;Susan French;John Eyles

  • Taking Environmental Action: The Role of Local Composition, Context, and Collective

    Sarah E. L. Wakefield;Susan J. Elliott;John D. Eyles;Donald C. Cole

  • Community reappraisal of the perceived health effects of a petroleum refinery.

    Isaac N Luginaah;Isaac N Luginaah;S Martin Taylor;Susan J Elliott;John D Eyles

  • Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.

    Julia Abelson;Jonathan Lomas;John Eyles;Stephen Birch

  • Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada

    John Eyles;Joanna Miyake;Michael Walker

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan J. Elliott
Susan J. Elliott University of Waterloo
Stephen Birch
Stephen Birch University of Queensland
Julia Abelson
Julia Abelson McMaster University
K. Bruce Newbold
K. Bruce Newbold McMaster University
Jeremiah Hurley
Jeremiah Hurley McMaster University
Donald C. Cole
Donald C. Cole University of Toronto
Isaac Luginaah
Isaac Luginaah University of Western Ontario
Stephen D. Walter
Stephen D. Walter McMaster University
John Frank
John Frank University of Edinburgh
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up numerous flexible and affordable pathways to rewarding careers. Many students seek advanced credentials through accelerated msw programs online, allowing them to earn a Master of Social Work in less time. This route is ideal for those aiming to work in social services, healthcare, or community organizations.

Psychology remains a popular field, with options like a 2 year psychology degree online offering a fast-track to careers in counseling, research, and human resources. Prospective counselors should consider programs that are both high-quality and recognized by industry bodies, such as cacrep accredited online counseling programs to ensure licensure and professional opportunities.

Those interested in supporting families and relationships may opt for a marriage and family therapist degree. This specialization leads to a meaningful career helping individuals and families navigate complex interpersonal challenges. Online degrees in these areas make it more accessible than ever to balance work, study, and life commitments while pursuing impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing John Eyles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles