World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3496 3219 590 540 163 16779

John Ingram publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Ingram between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Ingram published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2000. 9 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2000. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1971 2025

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Ingram: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 3
1995 5
1996 7
1997 5
1998 9
1999 5
2000 11
2001 5
2002 4
2003 6
2004 9
2005 4
2006 5
2007 11
2008 5
2009 8
2010 9
2011 5
2012 5
2013 3
2014 7
2015 10
2016 8
2017 5
2018 4
2019 2
2020 7
2021 4
2022 4
2023 5
2024 3
2025 6
Total 208
Download as CSV

John Ingram publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ingram sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 163
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

John Ingram D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ingram sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

John Ingram is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to agriculture, sustainability, and food systems. The main fields of study in which they have contributed include Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.

Their work spans various subfields such as Ecology, Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

John Ingram's research covers a wide range of topics, including:

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

They have contributed to numerous scholarly articles, including recent publications such as:

  • "Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges" (2022) published in Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • "Nutrition security is more than food security" (2020) published in Nature Food
  • "Toward Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems" (2020) published in Current Developments in Nutrition
  • "Benefits and challenges of food processing in the context of food systems, value chains and sustainable development goals" (2024) published in Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • "Impacts of the Ukraine-Russia Conflict on the Global Food Supply Chain and Building Future Resilience" (2023) published in EuroChoices

John Ingram frequently collaborates with co-authors including Monika Zurek, Saher Hasnain, Tessa Avermaete, Riaz Bhunnoo, and Bill Bellotti.

Their research has appeared repeatedly in journals such as Nature Food, Sustainability, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, and Appetite.

Best Publications

  • Climate Change and Food Systems

    Sonja J. Vermeulen;Bruce M. Campbell;John S.I. Ingram

  • Food security and food production systems

    John R. Porter;Liyong Xie;Andrew J. Challinor;Kevern Cochrane

  • Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries

    Bruce M. Campbell;Douglas J. Beare;Elena M. Bennett;Jason M. Hall-Spencer

  • A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change

    John Ingram

  • Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate

    Peter J. Gregory;Scott N. Johnson;Adrian C. Newton;John S. I. Ingram

  • Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change

    Sonja J. Vermeulen;Pramod K. Aggarwal;Pramod K. Aggarwal;A. Ainslie;C. Angelone

  • Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene:Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research

    Gisli Palsson;Bronislaw Szerszynski;Sverker Sörlin;John Marks

  • Food security and global environmental change: emerging challenges

    Polly J. Ericksen;John S.I. Ingram;Diana M. Liverman

  • Adapting food systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains to global environmental change: key information needs to improve policy formulation

    P.K. Aggarwal;P.K. Joshi;J.S.I. Ingram;R.K. Gupta

  • A vision for attaining food security

    Alison Misselhorn;Pramod Aggarwal;Polly Ericksen;Peter Gregory;Peter Gregory

  • Managing carbon sequestration in soils: concepts and terminology

    J.S.I. Ingram;E.C.M. Fernandes

  • Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change

    Joost M. Vervoort;Joost M. Vervoort;Philip K. Thornton;Philip K. Thornton;Patti Kristjanson;Wiebke Förch

  • Food Security and Global Environmental Change

    John Ingram;Polly Ericksen;Polly Ericksen;Diana M. Liverman

  • Effects of slash-and-burn agriculture and deforestation on climate change.

    P.Bernard Tinker;John S.I. Ingram;Sten Struwe

  • Climate Change, Global Food Security and the U.S. Food System

    Molly Brown;John Antle;Peter Backlund;Edward Carr

  • Seven Food System Metrics of Sustainable Nutrition Security

    David Gustafson;Alona Gutman;Whitney Leet;Adam Drewnowski

  • Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. The operational plan.

    W. L. Steffen;B. H. Walker;J. S. Ingram;George W Koch

  • Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English

    John C. L. Ingram;See-Gyoon Park

  • Environmental consequences of alternative practices for intensifying crop production

    P.J. Gregory;J.S.I. Ingram;R. Andersson;R.A. Betts

  • The effects of elevated [CO2] on plant-soil carbon below-ground: A summary and synthesis

    Josep G. Canadell;Louis F. Pitelka;John S. I. Ingram

  • The interaction of soil biota and soil structure under global change

    Iain. M. Young;Eric. Blanchart;Claire Chenu;Mark. Dangerfield

  • The role of agronomic research in climate change and food security policy

    J.S.I. Ingram;P.J. Gregory;A.-M. Izac

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen J. Chenery
Helen J. Chenery Bond University
Peter J. Gregory
Peter J. Gregory University of Reading
Pramod K. Aggarwal
Pramod K. Aggarwal Borlaug Institute for South Asia
Bruce E. Murdoch
Bruce E. Murdoch University of Queensland
Philip K. Thornton
Philip K. Thornton Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
Andrew J. Challinor
Andrew J. Challinor University of Leeds
James Hansen
James Hansen Columbia University
Bruce M. Campbell
Bruce M. Campbell Wageningen University & Research
Andy Jarvis
Andy Jarvis Bezos Earth Fund
Petr Havlik
Petr Havlik International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse and rewarding career pathways. Thanks to advancements in online education, students now have flexible options to accelerate their studies and enter the workforce sooner. For those interested in social work, msw accelerated programs allow dedicated individuals to earn a Master of Social Work degree quickly, preparing them for key roles in community welfare.

If psychology is your passion, consider accelerated psychology programs online. These programs help students develop practical skills and theoretical knowledge with greater time flexibility. For those interested in counseling, pursuing cacrep-accredited programs ensures your education meets professional standards, making you job-ready upon graduation.

Families and couples therapy is another growing field. Both entry-level and advanced professionals can benefit from online mft programs accredited for quality assurance and career advancement. These accredited, affordable, and flexible online degrees pave the way for fulfilling career opportunities in today’s fast-evolving social sciences landscape.

Best Scientists Citing John Ingram

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles