World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
11701
World Ranking
6335
National Ranking
2757

Barbara S. Bregman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara S. Bregman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Barbara S. Bregman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara S. Bregman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara S. Bregman is affiliated with Georgetown University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields connected to medicine, with a specialization in rehabilitation, pharmacology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology.

The main topics of their work include stroke rehabilitation and recovery, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, motor control and adaptation, and botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders.

Barbara S. Bregman has contributed to multiple publications with research published mainly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Barbara S. Bregman include:

  • "Interpreting the CPASS Trial: Do Not Shift Motor Therapy to the Subacute Phase" (2022), Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • "A trade-off between kinematic and dynamic control of bimanual reaching in virtual reality" (2022), Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Responsiveness to exoskeleton loading during bimanual reaching is associated with corticospinal tract integrity in stroke" (2024), Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "67553 Exoskeleton dynamics alter upper-limb coordination in a virtual reality reaching task" (2021), Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • "314 Exoskeletons increase paretic limb use in stroke survivors during a bimanual virtual reality reaching task" (2022), Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

The researcher frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Alexander Brunfeldt
  • Peter S. Lum
  • Alexander W. Dromerick
  • Matthew A. Edwardson
  • Kathaleen Brady

Barbara S. Bregman's work spans a multidisciplinary approach integrating rehabilitation sciences with neurological and pharmacological perspectives, contributing to advancements in clinical and translational understanding of motor control, stroke recovery, and use of assistive technologies such as exoskeletons in therapy contexts.

Best Publications

  • Recovery from spinal cord injury mediated by antibodies to neurite growth inhibitors

    Barbara S. Bregman;Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Lisa Schnell;Hai Ning Dai

  • Spinal axon regeneration induced by elevation of cyclic AMP.

    Jin Qiu;Dongming Cai;Haining Dai;Marietta McAtee

  • Transplantation of in vitro‐expanded fetal neural progenitor cells results in neurogenesis and functional recovery after spinal cord contusion injury in adult rats

    Y. Ogawa;K. Sawamoto;K. Sawamoto;T. Miyata;S. Miyao

  • Neuronal cyclic AMP controls the developmental loss in ability of axons to regenerate.

    Dongming Cai;Jin Qiu;Zixuan Cao;Marietta McAtee

  • Neurotrophic factors increase axonal growth after spinal cord injury and transplantation in the adult rat

    Barbara S. Bregman;Marietta McAtee;Hai Ning Dai;Penelope L. Kuhn

  • Ephrin-B2 and EphB2 Regulation of Astrocyte-Meningeal Fibroblast Interactions in Response to Spinal Cord Lesions in Adult Rats

    Liza Q. Bundesen;Tracy Aber Scheel;Barbara S. Bregman;Lawrence F. Kromer

  • Axonal regeneration and functional recovery after complete spinal cord transection in rats by delayed treatment with transplants and neurotrophins.

    Jean V. Coumans;Ted Tai-Sen Lin;Hai Ning Dai;Linda MacArthur

  • The phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram delivered after a spinal cord lesion promotes axonal regeneration and functional recovery.

    Elena Nikulina;J. Lille Tidwell;Hai Ning Dai;Barbara S. Bregman

  • Intraspinal transplantation of embryonic spinal cord tissue in neonatal and adult rats.

    P. J. Reier;B. S. Bregman;J. R. Wujek

  • Methods to Assess the Development and Recovery of Locomotor Function after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

    Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Hai-Ning Dai;Barbara S. Bregman

  • Recovery of Function after Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms Underlying Transplant-Mediated Recovery of Function Differ after Spinal Cord Injury in Newborn and Adult Rats

    Barbara S. Bregman;Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Paul J. Reier;Hai Ning Dai

  • Neural tissue transplants rescue axotomized rubrospinal cells from retrograde death

    Barbara S. Bregman;Paul J. Reier

  • Transplants and neurotrophic factors increase regeneration and recovery of function after spinal cord injury.

    Barbara S Bregman;Jean-Valery Coumans;Hai Ning Dai;Penelope L Kuhn

  • Differences in cytokine gene expression profile between acute and secondary injury in adult rat spinal cord.

    Masaya Nakamura;Richard A Houghtling;Linda MacArthur;Barbara M Bayer

  • Development of serotonin immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord and its plasticity after neonatal spinal cord lesions.

    Barbara S. Bregman

  • Transplants and neurotrophic factors prevent atrophy of mature CNS neurons after spinal cord injury.

    B.S. Bregman;E. Broude;M. McAtee;M.S. Kelley

  • Spinal cord transplants permit the growth of serotonergic axons across the site of neonatal spinal cord transection

    Barbara S. Bregman

  • c-Jun Expression in Adult Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons: Differential Response after Central or Peripheral Axotomy ☆

    E. Broude;M. McAtee;M.S. Kelley;B.S. Bregman

  • Extension of the critical period for developmental plasticity of the corticospinal pathway.

    Barbara S. Bregman;Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Marietta McAtee;Andrea O'Neill

  • Remodeling of synaptic structures in the motor cortex following spinal cord injury

    Byung G. Kim;Hai-Ning Dai;Marietta McAtee;Stefano Vicini

  • Recovery of function after spinal cord hemisection in newborn and adult rats: differential effects on reflex and locomotor function.

    Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Hai-Ning Dai;Barbara S. Bregman

Frequent Co-Authors

Masaya Nakamura
Masaya Nakamura Keio University
Joshua G. Corbin
Joshua G. Corbin Children’s National Health System
Hideyuki Okano
Hideyuki Okano Keio University
Yoshiaki Toyama
Yoshiaki Toyama Keio University
Marie T. Filbin
Marie T. Filbin City University of New York
Kazunobu Sawamoto
Kazunobu Sawamoto Nagoya City University
Stefano Vicini
Stefano Vicini Georgetown University Medical Center
Alex L. Kolodkin
Alex L. Kolodkin Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
R. Jeroen Pasterkamp
R. Jeroen Pasterkamp Utrecht University
Paul N. Hoffman
Paul N. Hoffman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Barbara S. Bregman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles