World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
10558
World Ranking
10472
National Ranking
797

Peter Kille publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kille sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 248 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter Kille D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kille sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Kille is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom, focusing on Environmental Science and related subfields. Their research spans multiple areas within this domain, including Ecology, Molecular Biology, Pollution, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their work covers a broad range of topics such as Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Trace Elements in Health, and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications.

Peter Kille has published extensively in various venues, with frequent contributions to journals and platforms including Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, The Science of The Total Environment, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Water.

The following are some of the recent papers associated with their network of research, indicating typical research directions and collaborations:

  • Species Sensitivity to Toxic Substances: Evolution, Ecology and Applications (2020), Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Moving towards improved surveillance and earlier diagnosis of aquatic pathogens: From traditional methods to emerging technologies (2022), Reviews in Aquaculture
  • The ZIP6/ZIP10 heteromer is essential for the zinc-mediated trigger of mitosis (2020), Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
  • Development of a novel metric for evaluating diatom assemblages in rivers using DNA metabarcoding (2020), Ecological Indicators
  • Addressing Nanomaterial Immunosafety by Evaluating Innate Immunity across Living Species (2020), Small

Peter Kille frequently collaborates with several researchers who appear often in their publications. These frequent co-authors include:

  • Davey L. Jones
  • Andrew J. Weightman
  • David J. Spurgeon
  • Sophie E. Watson
  • Luís Cunha

The combination of their consistent publication record and active collaboration with other researchers illustrates a focus on interdisciplinary approaches across environmental and molecular sciences. Their work touches upon ecosystems, toxicological assessments, pathogen surveillance techniques, molecular mechanisms involving trace elements, and the development of methods using environmental DNA.

Peter Kille's research contributes to understanding environmental toxicology, ecological patterns, and molecular biology aspects that affect living organisms, aligning with current scientific efforts to address environmental challenges through multi-field integration.

Best Publications

  • Control genes in quantitative molecular biological techniques: the variability of invariance

    Stephen R. Stürzenbaum;Peter Kille

  • Protein Kinase CK2 Triggers Cytosolic Zinc Signaling Pathways by Phosphorylation of Zinc Channel ZIP7

    Kathryn Mary Taylor;Stephen Edward Hiscox;Robert Ian Nicholson;Christer Hogstrand

  • Zinc transporters and cancer: a potential role for ZIP7 as a hub for tyrosine kinase activation

    C. Hogstrand;Peter Kille;Robert Ian Nicholson;Kathryn Mary Taylor

  • Microevolution and ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates.

    A. John Morgan;Peter Kille;Stephen R. Stürzenbaum

  • 'Systems toxicology' approach identifies coordinated metabolic responses to copper in a terrestrial non-model invertebrate, the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus

    Jacob G Bundy;Jasmin K Sidhu;Faisal Rana;David J Spurgeon

  • The Role of Omics in the Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways for Chemical Risk Assessment

    Erica K Brockmeier;Geoff Hodges;Thomas H Hutchinson;Emma Butler

  • Phylogeny and physiology of candidate phylum 'Atribacteria' (OP9/JS1) inferred from cultivation-independent genomics

    Masaru K. Nobu;Jeremy A. Dodsworth;Jeremy A. Dodsworth;Senthil K. Murugapiran;Christian Rinke;Christian Rinke

  • Cadmium detoxification in earthworms: from genes to cells

    Stephen R Stürzenbaum;Oleg Georgiev;A John Morgan;Peter Kille

  • Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook

    Graham Van Aggelen;Gerald T. Ankley;William S. Baldwin;Daniel W. Bearden

  • Metal ion trafficking in earthworms. Identification of a cadmium-specific metallothionein.

    Stephen R. Stürzenbaum;Carole Winters;Malyka Galay;A. John Morgan

  • Different routes, same pathways: Molecular mechanisms under silver ion and nanoparticle exposures in the soil sentinel Eisenia fetida.

    Marta Novo;Elma Lahive;María Díez-Ortiz;Marianne Matzke

  • The identification, cloning and characterization of earthworm metallothionein.

    S.R Stürzenbaum;P Kille;A.J Morgan

  • A mechanism for epithelial–mesenchymal transition and anoikis resistance in breast cancer triggered by zinc channel ZIP6 and STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3)

    Christer Hogstrand;Peter Kille;Margaret Leigh Ackland;Stephen Edward Hiscox

  • The effect of anthropogenic arsenic contamination on the earthworm microbiome

    Daniel Antony Pass;Andrew John Morgan;Daniel S. Read;Dawn Field

  • Evidence for the existence of a functional Kiss1/Kiss1 receptor pathway in fish

    R. van Aerle;P. Kille;A. Lange;C.R. Tyler

  • Differential metallothionein expression in earthworm (Lumbricus rubellus) tissues.

    A.J. Morgan;S.R. Stürzenbaum;C. Winters;G.W. Grime

  • Regulation of ZIP and ZnT zinc transporters in zebrafish gill: zinc repression of ZIP10 transcription by an intronic MRE cluster

    Dongling Zheng;Graham P. Feeney;Peter Kille;Christer Hogstrand

  • Transcriptome profiling of developmental and xenobiotic responses in a keystone soil animal, the oligochaete annelid Lumbricus rubellus

    Jennifer Owen;B Ann Hedley;Claus Svendsen;Jodie Wren

  • Identification and characterization of a recombinant metallothionein protein from a marine alga, Fucus vesiculosus.

    Ceri A. Morris;Beate Nicolaus;Viola Sampson;John L. Harwood

  • Measurement of annetocin gene expression: a new reproductive biomarker in earthworm ecotoxicology.

    H.J. Ricketts;A.J. Morgan;D.J. Spurgeon;P. Kille

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Spurgeon
David J. Spurgeon University of Reading
Stephen R. Stürzenbaum
Stephen R. Stürzenbaum King's College London
Claus Svendsen
Claus Svendsen Imperial College London
Christer Hogstrand
Christer Hogstrand King's College London
John L. Harwood
John L. Harwood Cardiff University
John Kay
John Kay Cardiff University
George G. Brown
George G. Brown Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation
Clemente Capasso
Clemente Capasso National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Mark Blaxter
Mark Blaxter Wellcome Sanger Institute
Mark E. Hodson
Mark E. Hodson University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens diverse opportunities in science, healthcare, and related fields. Many students explore nutrition degree programs as a specialized route. These programs offer flexibility, enabling you to pursue your education online and tailor your studies to rapidly growing areas like public health and dietetics.

Ambitious graduates may also consider advancing into leadership roles with an online healthcare mba programs. Such a degree can prepare you for high-demand positions in healthcare management, equipping you with business skills tailored for the medical sector.

Another in-demand pathway is medical coding, which requires careful understanding of science and data. Comparing credentials like certified coding specialist (ccs) certification is crucial, as each offers different career prospects, salary ranges, and certification costs.

Curious about earning potential? Discover how much does a medical coder make to help guide your career decisions. Whether you pursue nutrition, healthcare management, or medical coding, these online degree options and certifications provide flexible ways to advance your education and career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Kille

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles