World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
72
Citations
18917
World Ranking
1490
National Ranking
635

Daniel L. Villeneuve publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Villeneuve sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 266 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel L. Villeneuve D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Villeneuve sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment

    Gerald T. Ankley;Richard S. Bennett;Russell J. Erickson;Dale J. Hoff

  • Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Development I: Strategies and Principles

    Unknown

  • Identification and quantification of estrogen receptor agonists in wastewater effluents.

    Shane A. Snyder;Daniel L. Villeneuve;Erin M. Snyder;John P. Giesy

  • Derivation and application of relative potency estimates based on in vitro bioassay results

    Daniel L. Villeneuve;Alan L. Blankenship;John P. Giesy

  • Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams

    Paul M. Bradley;Celeste A. Journey;Kristin M. Romanok;Larry B. Barber

  • The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Russell S Thomas;Tina Bahadori;Timothy J Buckley;John Cowden

  • The fathead minnow in aquatic toxicology: past, present and future.

    Gerald T. Ankley;Daniel L. Villeneuve

  • Characterization and Distribution of Trace Organic Contaminants in Sediment from Masan Bay, Korea. 1. Instrumental Analysis

    Jong Seong Khim;Kurunthachalam Kannan;Daniel L. Villeneuve;Chul Hwan Koh

  • Linkage of biochemical responses to population‐level effects: A case study with vitellogenin in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

    David H. Miller;Kathleen M. Jensen;Daniel L. Villeneuve;Michael D. Kahl

  • Relative Potencies of Individual Polychlorinated Naphthalenes and Halowax Mixtures To Induce Ah Receptor-Mediated Responses

    Alan L. Blankenship;Kurunthachalam Kannan;Sergio A. Villalobos;Daniel L. Villeneuve

  • Effects of Two Fungicides with Multiple Modes of Action on Reproductive Endocrine Function in the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)

    Gerald T. Ankley;Kathleen M. Jensen;Elizabeth J. Durhan;Elizabeth A. Makynen

  • Relative potencies of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to induce dioxinlike and estrogenic responses in three cell lines

    D. L. Villeneuve;J. S. Khim;J. S. Khim;K. Kannan;J. P. Giesy

  • Vertical Profile of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, Naphthalenes, Biphenyls, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Alkylphenols in a Sediment Core from Tokyo Bay, Japan

    Nobuyoshi Yamashita;Kurunthachalam Kannan;Takashi Imagawa;Daniel L. Villeneuve

  • Increasing Scientific Confidence in Adverse Outcome Pathways: Application of Tailored Bradford-Hill Considerations for Evaluating Weight of Evidence.

    Richard A. Becker;Gerald T. Ankley;Stephen W. Edwards;Sean W. Kennedy

  • Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways and Their Application to Predictive Toxicology.

    Rory B. Conolly;Gerald T. Ankley;WanYun Cheng;Michael L. Mayo

  • Computational Toxicology—A State of the Science Mini Review

    Robert J. Kavlock;Gerald Ankley;Jerry Blancato;Michael Breen

  • Adverse Outcome Pathways—Organizing Toxicological Information to Improve Decision Making

    Unknown

  • A graphical systems model to facilitate hypothesis-driven ecotoxicogenomics research on the teleost brain-pituitary-gonadal axis.

    Daniel L Villeneuve;Patrick Larkin;Iris Knoebl;Ann L Miracle

  • Editor’s Highlight: Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS): A Web-Based Tool for Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Species Extrapolation of Chemical Toxicity

    Carlie A. LaLone;Daniel L. Villeneuve;David Lyons;Henry W. Helgen

  • Ketoconazole in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas): reproductive toxicity and biological compensation.

    Gerald T. Ankley;Kathleen M. Jensen;Michael D. Kahl;Elizabeth A. Makynen

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
John P. Giesy
John P. Giesy University of Saskatchewan
Xiaowei Zhang
Xiaowei Zhang Nanjing University
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
Paul M. Bradley
Paul M. Bradley United States Geological Survey
Nancy D. Denslow
Nancy D. Denslow University of Florida
Dana W. Kolpin
Dana W. Kolpin United States Geological Survey
James M. Lazorchak
James M. Lazorchak Environmental Protection Agency
Jong Seong Khim
Jong Seong Khim Seoul National University
Scott E. Belanger
Scott E. Belanger Procter & Gamble (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide diverse career opportunities. Educators seeking advanced credentials might consider programs highlighted in the best online eds to edd programs, which offer flexible learning paths tailored to education professionals.

Social work is another field connected to environmental advocacy and community engagement. Affordable advanced degrees like the cheapest online dsw programs provide pathways to leadership roles that can influence environmental policy and social justice.

For students seeking broad-based knowledge that can be applied within environmental careers, the best affordable online general studies degree programs offer cost-effective options with flexible curricula. Additionally, those new to higher education or changing fields might find the easy bachelor degrees useful in jumpstarting their academic journey without overwhelming commitments.

Choosing the right online degree involves balancing affordability, flexibility, and relevance to career goals. By considering these related programs, students can align their education with evolving environmental and professional landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Villeneuve

Recently Published Articles