World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8649
World Ranking
6043
National Ranking
2185

Scott E. Belanger publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Belanger sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scott E. Belanger D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Belanger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott E. Belanger is a researcher affiliated with Procter & Gamble in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on pollution, toxicology, and environmental chemistry. The research contributions span a range of topics including environmental toxicology, pesticide and herbicide environmental studies, pharmaceutical environmental impacts, and plastic pollution.

Their publications have appeared frequently in journals such as Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, with additional works in Chemosphere, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Environmental Modelling & Software. These publication venues reflect a focus on environmental assessments, toxicity testing, and regulatory implications in environmental science.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • Comparisons of PNEC derivation logic flows under example regulatory schemes and implications for ecoTTC, 2021, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia Have Similar Sensitivity in Standard Acute and Chronic Toxicity Tests, 2021, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Oryzias sinensis, a new model organism in the application of eco-toxicity and water quality criteria (WQC), 2020, Chemosphere
  • Development of a hybrid Bayesian network model for predicting acute fish toxicity using multiple lines of evidence, 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Environmental hazard of cationic polymers relevant in personal and consumer care products: A critical review, 2022, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Frequent collaborators in their research include Kristin A. Connors, Jessica L. Brill, Hans Sanderson, Anna Magdalene Brun Hansen, and Michelle R. Embry. These co-authors have contributed to multiple studies alongside Scott E. Belanger, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Their core fields of study are Environmental Science, with subfields emphasizing Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Food Science, and Organic Chemistry. The main research topics addressed are:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Best Publications

  • Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

    Alistair B. A. Boxall;Murray A. Rudd;Bryan W. Brooks;Daniel J. Caldwell

  • Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test

    E. Lammer;G.J. Carr;K. Wendler;J.M. Rawlings

  • The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research.

    Michelle R. Embry;Scott E. Belanger;Thomas A. Braunbeck;Malyka Galay-Burgos

  • OECD validation study to assess intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the zebrafish embryo toxicity test for acute aquatic toxicity testing

    François Busquet;Ruben Strecker;Jane M. Rawlings;Scott E. Belanger

  • Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data-based comparison

    Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Gregory J. Carr

  • Use of fish embryo toxicity tests for the prediction of acute fish toxicity to chemicals

    Scott E. Belanger;Jane M. Rawlings;Gregory J. Carr

  • A European perspective on alternatives to animal testing for environmental hazard identification and risk assessment

    Stefan Scholz;Erika Sela;Ludek Blaha;Thomas Braunbeck

  • Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America

    Christina Cowan-Ellsberry;Scott Belanger;Philip Dorn;Scott Dyer

  • Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research.

    Kristin A. Connors;Scott D. Dyer;Scott E. Belanger

  • Predicted no-effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: Linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap

    Erik J. van de Plassche;Jack H. M. de Bruijn;Richard R. Stephenson;Stuart J. Marshall

  • Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

    Scott Belanger;Mace Barron;Peter Craig;Scott Dyer

  • Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: Physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties

    Gustav Könnecker;Jürgen Regelmann;Scott Belanger;Konrad Gamon

  • Saltatory ontogeny of fishes and sensitive early life stages for ecotoxicology tests.

    Scott E. Belanger;Eugene K. Balon;Jane M. Rawlings

  • Alternative approaches to vertebrate ecotoxicity tests in the 21st century: A review of developments over the last 2 decades and current status.

    Adam Lillicrap;Scott Belanger;Natalie Burden;David Du Pasquier

  • Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.

    Scott D. Dyer;Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Joel G. Chaney

  • Comparison of Species Sensitivity Distributions Derived from Interspecies Correlation Models to Distributions used to Derive Water Quality Criteria

    Scott D. Dyer;Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Joel G. Chaney

  • Aquatic risk assessment of alcohol ethoxylates in North America and Europe

    S.E. Belanger;P.B. Dorn;R. Toy;G. Boeije

  • Investigating Alternatives to the fish early-life stage test: A strategy for discovering and annotating adverse outcome pathways for early fish development

    Daniel Villeneuve;David C. Volz;Michelle R. Embry;Gerald T. Ankley

  • Adverse Outcome Pathways during Early Fish Development: A Conceptual Framework for Identification of Chemical Screening and Prioritization Strategies

    David C. Volz;Scott Belanger;Michelle Embry;Stephanie Padilla

  • Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches

    Aude Kienzler;Mace G. Barron;Scott E Belanger;Amy Beasley

  • Alternatives to in vivo tests to detect endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in fish and amphibians--screening for estrogen, androgen and thyroid hormone disruption.

    S Scholz;P Renner;S E Belanger;F Busquet

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott D. Dyer
Scott D. Dyer LeTourneau University
Donald S. Cherry
Donald S. Cherry Virginia Tech
John Cairns
John Cairns Virginia Tech
Kristin Schirmer
Kristin Schirmer Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Mace G. Barron
Mace G. Barron Environmental Protection Agency
Thomas Braunbeck
Thomas Braunbeck Heidelberg University
James T. Oris
James T. Oris Miami University
Daniel L. Villeneuve
Daniel L. Villeneuve Environmental Protection Agency
Mark E. McMaster
Mark E. McMaster Environment and Climate Change Canada
Edward Topp
Edward Topp Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many programs offer flexible options, such as pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree, which provides a strong foundation in understanding social factors impacting environmental policies.

Advanced educators looking to specialize often seek programs like online edd programs no dissertation, allowing them to focus on practical leadership skills without the lengthy dissertation process. This path is ideal for professionals aiming to influence environmental education and policy.

Current educators with a master's degree may consider eds to edd programs, which help transition from educational specialists to doctorate holders, empowering them to lead interdisciplinary environmental initiatives.

For those interested in social welfare connected to environmental justice, options like fully funded dsw programs online present an excellent opportunity. These programs combine social work expertise with sustainability goals, preparing graduates to address complex community challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Scott E. Belanger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles