World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 8070 7756 2890 2692 93 6294

Scott D. Dyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott D. Dyer between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott D. Dyer published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2008. 3 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2008. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1989 2025

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott D. Dyer: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 5
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 1
2008 10
2009 7
2010 1
2011 6
2012 5
2013 4
2014 6
2015 2
2016 4
2017 4
2018 4
2019 4
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 2
Total 98
Download as CSV

Scott D. Dyer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Dyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 93
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott D. Dyer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Dyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - IEEE Fellow For design and development of spectrum-recovery methods and fast algorithms in Hadamard-transform multiplex spectrometry.

Overview

Scott D. Dyer is affiliated with LeTourneau University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences and medicine, focusing particularly on education and medical topics related to surgery and respiratory medicine.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Medicine

Within these broader areas, their subfields of work cover:

  • Education
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Surgery

The major topics addressed in their research include:

  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Scott D. Dyer has published research in a variety of academic journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • World Journal of Surgery
  • BMJ Open Quality
  • Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal
  • Journal of Geography in Higher Education
  • International Journal Of Management and Applied Research

Notable papers authored or co-authored by Scott D. Dyer include:

  • "Rates of Bile Acid Diarrhoea After Cholecystectomy: A Multicentre Audit" (2021, World Journal of Surgery)
  • "Summarised, verified and accessible: improving clinical information management for potential haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients" (2021, BMJ Open Quality)
  • "Delving into Institutional Diversity Messaging: A Cross-Institutional Analysis of Student and Faculty Interpretations of Undergraduate Experiences of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in University Websites" (2022, Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal)
  • "Courageous and compassionate teaching: international reflections on our responses to teaching geography during the pandemic" (2023, Journal of Geography in Higher Education)
  • "Discovery grants for education innovation- supporting the adoption of people-centred design in HE one step at a time" (2023, International Journal Of Management and Applied Research)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott D. Dyer include:

  • Alexia Farrugia
  • Joseph Attard
  • Stuart Hanmer
  • Stuart Bullock
  • Siobhan McKay

Scott D. Dyer received the IEEE Fellow award in 1997 for contributions to spectrum-recovery methods and fast algorithms in Hadamard-transform multiplex spectrometry.

Best Publications

  • Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

    Alistair B. A. Boxall;Murray A. Rudd;Bryan W. Brooks;Daniel J. Caldwell

  • Toxicology of Synthetic Pyrethroids in Aquatic Organisms: An Overview

    J. R. Coats;D. M. Symonik;S. P. Bradbury;S. D. Dyer

  • Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America

    Christina Cowan-Ellsberry;Scott Belanger;Philip Dorn;Scott Dyer

  • Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research.

    Kristin A. Connors;Scott D. Dyer;Scott E. Belanger

  • Crucial role of mechanisms and modes of toxic action for understanding tissue residue toxicity and internal effect concentrations of organic chemicals.

    Beate I. Escher;Beate I. Escher;Roman Ashauer;Scott Dyer;Joop L. M. Hermens

  • Ceriodaphnia and daphnia: A comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species

    DJ Versteeg;M Stalmans;SD Dyer;Colin Janssen

  • Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

    Scott Belanger;Mace Barron;Peter Craig;Scott Dyer

  • Removal of alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl ethoxylate sulfates, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in wastewater treatment

    Drew C. McAvoy;Scott D. Dyer;Nicholas J. Fendinger;William S. Eckhoff

  • Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates.

    Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry;Scott D. Dyer;Susan Erhardt;Mary Jo Bernhard

  • Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.

    Scott D. Dyer;Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Joel G. Chaney

  • Comparison of Species Sensitivity Distributions Derived from Interspecies Correlation Models to Distributions used to Derive Water Quality Criteria

    Scott D. Dyer;Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Joel G. Chaney

  • Traits-based approaches in bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

    Paul J Van den Brink;Alexa C Alexander;Mélanie Desrosiers;Willem Goedkoop

  • Occurrence and weight-of-evidence risk assessment of alkyl sulfates, alkyl ethoxysulfates, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) in river water and sediments.

    Hans Sanderson;Scott D. Dyer;Bradford B. Price;Allen M. Nielsen

  • Tissue-specific patterns of synthesis of heat-shock proteins and thermal tolerance of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

    Scott D. Dyer;Kenneth L. Dickson;Earl G. Zimmerman;Brenda M. Sanders

  • The influence of untreated wastewater to aquatic communities in the Balatuin River, The Philippines.

    Scott D Dyer;Charles Peng;Drew C McAvoy;Nick J Fendinger

  • PREDICTIVE MODELS ATTRIBUTE EFFECTS ON FISH ASSEMBLAGES TO TOXICITY AND HABITAT ALTERATION

    Dick de Zwart;Scott D. Dyer;Leo Posthuma;Charles P. Hawkins

  • Protein and lipid binding parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) blood and liver fractions to extrapolate from an in vitro metabolic degradation assay to in vivo bioaccumulation potential of hydrophobic organic chemicals

    Beate I. Escher;Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry;Scott Dyer;Michelle R. Embry

  • Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China.

    C.L. Feng;F.C. Wu;S.D. Dyer;H. Chang

  • An LC50 vs time model for the aquatic toxicity of reactive and receptor-mediated compounds. consequences for bioconcentration kinetics and risk assessment

    Henk J. M. Verhaar;Watze de Wolf;Scott Dyer;Karin C. H. M. Legierse

  • Extrapolation Practice for Ecotoxicological Effect Characterization of Chemicals

    Keith R. Solomon;Theo C.M. Brock;Dick de Zwart;Scott D. Dyer

  • Environmental Behavior and Fate of Anionic Surfactants

    Nicholas J. Fendinger;Donald J. Versteeg;Els Weeg;Scott Dyer

  • Repeatability and Reproducibility of the RTgill-W1 Cell Line Assay for Predicting Fish Acute Toxicity.

    Melanie Fischer;Scott E Belanger;Pascale Berckmans;Mary J Bernhard

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott E. Belanger
Scott E. Belanger Procter & Gamble (United States)
Leo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma Radboud University
Beate I. Escher
Beate I. Escher Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
G. Allen Burton
G. Allen Burton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mace G. Barron
Mace G. Barron Environmental Protection Agency
Helmut Segner
Helmut Segner University of Bern
Donald S. Cherry
Donald S. Cherry Virginia Tech
Paul K. Sibley
Paul K. Sibley University of Guelph
Michael St. J. Warne
Michael St. J. Warne University of Queensland
Joop L. M. Hermens
Joop L. M. Hermens Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that intersect with social, educational, and policy-related fields. For those interested in the social impact of environmental issues, exploring the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide a strong foundation in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

Educators and professionals seeking advanced qualifications might consider online doctoral options. Programs such as the 1 year phd programs online no dissertation and best online eds to edd programs offer flexible pathways for educators to enhance leadership skills without the traditional dissertation requirement.

For those aiming to impact community wellbeing and environmental justice, advanced social work degrees such as the online dsw programs in social work provide essential training to address complex social and environmental challenges.

Integrating knowledge from these related fields broadens career options, empowering graduates to contribute meaningfully to sustainability, education, and social equity.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Dyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles