World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
8618
World Ranking
5260
National Ranking
1936

Mace G. Barron publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mace G. Barron sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mace G. Barron D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mace G. Barron sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mace G. Barron is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with numerous contributions exploring pollution, toxicology, and ecological impacts of contaminants.

Their key areas of study include:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Environmental Chemistry and Analysis

Mace G. Barron's documented subfields of study highlight extensive work in:

  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Small Animals

The scientist has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues, including:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Aquatic Toxicology
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Among Mace G. Barron's recent papers are:

  • Long-Term Ecological Impacts from Oil Spills: Comparison of Exxon Valdez, Hebei Spirit, and Deepwater Horizon, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Toxicity of oil spill response agents and crude oils to five aquatic test species, 2020, Marine Pollution Bulletin

Frequent coauthors with whom Mace G. Barron has collaborated include:

  • Kristin A. Connors
  • Devi Sundaravadivelu
  • P. Meyer
  • Jessica L. Brill
  • Scott E. Belanger

Best Publications

  • Bioconcentration. Will water-borne organic chemicals accumulate in aquatic animals?

    Mace G. Barron

  • Evaluation of Fish Early Life-Stage Toxicity Models of Chronic Embryonic Exposures to Complex Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Mixtures

    Mace G. Barron;Mark G. Carls;Ron Heintz;Stanley D. Rice

  • Ecological Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Implications for Immunotoxicity

    Mace G. Barron

  • Relative potency of PAHs and heterocycles as aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists in fish.

    Mace G Barron;Ron Heintz;Stanley D Rice

  • Ecotoxicology of chlorpyrifos.

    Mace G. Barron;Kent B. Woodburn

  • Long-Term Ecological Impacts from Oil Spills: Comparison of Exxon Valdez, Hebei Spirit, and Deepwater Horizon

    Mace G. Barron;Deborah N. Vivian;Ron A. Heintz;Un Hyuk Yim

  • Temperature-dependence of cardiac output and regional blood flow in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson

    M. G. Barron;B. D. Tarr;W. L. Hayton

  • Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species.

    Michael J. Hemmer;Mace G. Barron;Richard M. Greene

  • Photoenhanced toxicity of aqueous phase and chemically dispersed weathered Alaska North Slope crude oil to Pacific herring eggs and larvae.

    Mace G. Barron;Mark G. Carls;Jeffrey W. Short;Stanley D. Rice

  • Are aromatic hydrocarbons the primary determinant of petroleum toxicity to aquatic organisms

    M.G Barron;T Podrabsky;S Ogle;R.W Ricker

  • Pharmacokinetic modeling in aquatic animals I. Models and concepts

    Mace G. Barron;Guy R. Stehly;William L. Hayton

  • Comparative reproductive and developmental toxicology of PCBs in birds

    M.G. Barron;H. Galbraith;D. Beltman

  • Nucleic Acid, Protein Content, and Growth of Larval Fish Sublethally Exposed to Various Toxicants

    Mace G. Barron;Ira R. Adelman

  • Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

    Scott Belanger;Mace Barron;Peter Craig;Scott Dyer

  • Rate‐limiting barriers to xenobiotic uptake by the gill

    William L. Hayton;Mace G. Barron

  • Comparison of Species Sensitivity Distributions Derived from Interspecies Correlation Models to Distributions used to Derive Water Quality Criteria

    Scott D. Dyer;Donald J. Versteeg;Scott E. Belanger;Joel G. Chaney

  • Thermoacclimatory response of nucleic acid and protein content of carp muscle tissue: influence of growth rate and relationship to glycine uptake by scales

    Edward M. Goolish;Mace G. Barron;Ira R. Adelman

  • Determinants of variability in acute to chronic toxicity ratios for aquatic invertebrates and fish

    Sandy Raimondo;Brian J. Montague;Mace G. Barron

  • Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.

    Wayne R Munns;Anne W Rea;Glenn W Suter;Lawrence Martin

  • Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models.

    Raimondo S;Mineau P;Barron Mg

  • Critical evaluation of CROSERF test methods for oil dispersant toxicity testing under subarctic conditions.

    Mace G. Barron;Lisa Ka’aihue

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott E. Belanger
Scott E. Belanger Procter & Gamble (United States)
Stanley D. Rice
Stanley D. Rice National Marine Fisheries Service
Scott D. Dyer
Scott D. Dyer LeTourneau University
Glenn W. Suter
Glenn W. Suter Environmental Protection Agency
David E. Hinton
David E. Hinton Duke University
Swee J. Teh
Swee J. Teh University of California, Davis
Donald E. Tillitt
Donald E. Tillitt United States Geological Survey
Richard T. Di Giulio
Richard T. Di Giulio Duke University
Leo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma Radboud University
Albert D. Venosa
Albert D. Venosa Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to diverse career pathways that intersect with multiple disciplines. For those interested in spatial data and mapping environmental changes, a geographic information systems degree provides specialized skills to analyze and visualize environmental data, supporting urban planning, conservation, and disaster management.

Leadership roles in environmental policy and community engagement often require an understanding of public sector management. An best online masters in public administration can equip students with the tools to manage environmental programs, influence policy, and drive sustainable initiatives within government agencies or nonprofit organizations.

Understanding the social dynamics behind environmental issues is essential, making a bachelors degree in sociology online a valuable complement. This degree enhances awareness of human behavior and societal factors impacting environmental justice and sustainable community development.

For professionals seeking advanced credentials without extensive research commitments, an online doctorate degree online no dissertation offers a flexible path to gaining expertise and leadership readiness. This option enables environmental practitioners to focus on applied knowledge and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Mace G. Barron

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles