World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
11193
World Ranking
4694
National Ranking
1734

Glenn W. Suter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn W. Suter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 265 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Glenn W. Suter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn W. Suter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Glenn W. Suter is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Additional subfields they have contributed to include sociology and political science, water science and technology, management, monitoring, policy and law, and computational theory and mathematics.

Their work covers a range of main topics such as environmental justice and health disparities, effects and risks of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, environmental and social impact assessments, computational drug discovery methods, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, water quality and pollution assessment, as well as climate change and health impacts.

Recent significant papers authored by Glenn W. Suter include:

  • Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence Are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework (2020, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management)
  • Clearly Weighing the Evidence in Read-Across Can Improve Assessments of Data-Poor Chemicals (2021, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology)
  • Environmental Assessors Should Use State-of-Practice Weight-of-Evidence Processes (2021, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry)

Additional papers within their network or citing similar themes feature coauthors such as Susan M. Cormier, Lucina E. Lizarraga, Jennifer Nichols, Emma T. Lavoie, and Jason C. Lambert. Coauthor collaborations most frequently occur with Susan M. Cormier and Lucina E. Lizarraga.

Glenn W. Suter has published multiple articles in key venues including Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. These journals serve as primary outlets for their environmental and toxicological research contributions.

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1993.

Best Publications

  • Ecological Risk Assessment

    Glenn W. Suter

  • Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology

    Leo Posthuma;Glenn W. Suter;Theo P. Traas

  • A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes

    Glenn W. Suter

  • Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making

    Gail Bingham;Richard Bishop;Michael Brody;Daniel Bromley

  • Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale

    Carolyn T. Hunsaker;Robin L. Graham;Glenn W. Suter;Robert V. O'Neill

  • Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments

    Glenn W. Suter

  • Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites

    Glenn W. Suter;Rebecca A. Efroymson;Bradley E. Sample;Daniel S. Jones

  • Communicating Ecological Indicators to Decision Makers and the Public

    A. Schiller;Carolyn Hunsaker;Kane;A.K. Wolfe

  • Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1996 Revision

    B.E. Sample;D.M. Opresko;G.W. Suter

  • Ecosystem risk analysis: A new methodology

    R. V. O'Neill;R. H. Gardner;L. W. Barnthouse;G. W. Suter

  • Compacted Soil Barriers at Abandoned Landfill Sites are Likely to Fail in the Long Term

    Glenn W. Suter;Robert J. Luxmoore;Ellen D. Smith

  • Derivation of a benchmark for freshwater ionic strength

    Susan M. Cormier;Glenn W. Suter;Lei Zheng

  • Endpoints for responses of fish to chronic toxic exposures

    Glenn W. Suter;Aaron E. Rosen;Ernst Linder;David F. Parkhurst

  • The Overlooked Terrestrial Impacts of Mountaintop Mining

    James Wickham;Petra Bohall Wood;Matthew C. Nicholson;William Jenkins

  • Abuse of hypothesis testing statistics in ecological risk assessment

    Glenn W. Suter

  • Risks of toxic contaminants to exploited fish populations: Influence of life history, data uncertainty and exploitation intensity

    Lawrence W. Barnthouse;Glenn W. Suter;Aaron E. Rosen

  • A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems

    Glenn W. Suter;Susan B. Norton;Susan M. Cormier

  • Framework for the Integration of Health and Ecological Risk Assessment

    Glenn W. Suter;Theo Vermeire;Jun Sekizawa;Martin L. King

  • Assessing causation of the extirpation of stream macroinvertebrates by a mixture of ions

    Susan M. Cormier;Glenn W. Suter;Lei Zheng;Gregory J. Pond

  • Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment

    Glenn W. Suter

  • Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites

    Antonio Marcomini;Glenn Walter Suter;Andrea Critto

  • Model based inference in the life sciences: A primer on evidence, by David R. Anderson

    Glenn Suter

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert V. O'Neill
Robert V. O'Neill Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Leo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma Radboud University
Robert H. Gardner
Robert H. Gardner University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
Thomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Kenneth M.Y. Leung
Kenneth M.Y. Leung City University of Hong Kong
Andrea Critto
Andrea Critto Central Maine Community College
Graeme E. Batley
Graeme E. Batley Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Antonio Marcomini
Antonio Marcomini Ca Foscari University of Venice
Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through complementary online degrees. For example, expertise in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is increasingly valuable in environmental analysis and management. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs can equip professionals with critical skills in spatial data interpretation and mapping technologies.

Environmental professionals often engage with public policies and administration. Enhancing your qualifications with an online Master’s in Public Administration can prepare you to address environmental issues through governance and community programs. The best online masters in public administration offer flexible paths for working professionals aiming to make an impact in public sector roles.

Understanding social dynamics is essential for effective environmental advocacy. Online sociological studies provide insights into human behavior and societal structures. Explore some of the best online bachelors in sociology programs to gain a broader perspective on environmental challenges from a human context.

Finally, those interested in educational leadership or advancing environmental education may benefit from pursuing advanced degrees without the burden of lengthy dissertations. Several online edd programs no dissertation provide accelerated pathways for educators and administrators.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn W. Suter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles