World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
79
Citations
20557
World Ranking
1022
National Ranking
28

Paul J. Van den Brink publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Van den Brink sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 278 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul J. Van den Brink D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Van den Brink sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Van den Brink is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these fields, their work focuses on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Ecology, Insect Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of Paul J. Van den Brink's research include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Insect and Pesticide Research, Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies, Plant and animal studies, Physiological and biochemical adaptations, and Water Quality and Pollution Assessment.

Their research outputs have been published frequently in the following venues:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Chemosphere
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Pollution

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul J. Van den Brink include:

  • Andreu Rico
  • Ivo Roessink
  • E.T.H.M. Peeters
  • Markus Hermann
  • Annika Mangold-Döring

Recent papers by Paul J. Van den Brink cover a range of topics related to multiple stressors, microplastic pollution, chemical impacts on aquatic ecosystems, and combined environmental effects. Selected publications include:

  • Towards a unified study of multiple stressors: divisions and common goals across research disciplines, 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Distribution of microplastic and small macroplastic particles across four fish species and sediment in an African lake, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • (Eco)toxicological tests for assessing impacts of chemical stress to aquatic ecosystems: Facts, challenges, and future, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Combined effects of heatwaves and micropollutants on freshwater ecosystems: Towards an integrated assessment of extreme events in multiple stressors research, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let's cooperate!, 2020, Environmental Sciences Europe

Best Publications

  • Principal response curves: Analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress

    Paul J. Van den Brink;Cajo J. F. Ter Braak

  • Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems

    Lorraine Maltby;Naomi Blake;Theo C. M. Brock;Paul J. Van den Brink

  • Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks.

    Rai S. Kookana;Alistair B. A. Boxall;Philip T. Reeves;Roman Ashauer

  • Use of veterinary medicines, feed additives and probiotics in four major internationally traded aquaculture species farmed in Asia

    Andreu Rico;Tran Minh Phu;Tran Minh Phu;Kriengkrai Satapornvanit;Jiang Min

  • Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

    Werner Brack;Werner Brack;Valeria Dulio;Marlene Ågerstrand;Ian Allan

  • Towards a unified study of multiple stressors: divisions and common goals across research disciplines.

    James A Orr;Rolf D Vinebrooke;Michelle C Jackson;Kristy J Kroeker

  • Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.

    Rolf Altenburger;Selim Ait-Aissa;Philipp Antczak;Thomas Backhaus

  • Combined and interactive effects of global climate change and toxicants on populations and communities

    S. Jannicke Moe;Karel De Schamphelaere;William H. Clements;Mary T. Sorensen

  • Use of chemicals and biological products in Asian aquaculture and their potential environmental risks: a critical review

    Andreu Rico;Kriengkrai Satapornvanit;Mohammad M. Haque;Jiang Min

  • Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach

    Jacqueline Augusiak;Paul J. Van den Brink;Volker Grimm;Volker Grimm

  • Multivariate analysis of stress in experimental ecosystems by principal response curves and similarity analysis

    Paul J. Van den Brink;Cajo J.F. Ter Braak

  • Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime.

    Lorraine Maltby;Theo C M Brock;Paul J Van den Brink

  • THE NEONICOTINOID IMIDACLOPRID SHOWS HIGH CHRONIC TOXICITY TO MAYFLY NYMPHS

    Ivo Roessink;Lemessa B. Merga;Hans J. Zweers;Paul J. Van den Brink

  • The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management.

    Werner Brack;Rolf Altenburger;Gerrit Schüürmann;Martin Krauss

  • Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review

    René P A Van Wijngaarden;Theo C M Brock;Paul J Van den Brink

  • Effects of the insecticide dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in outdoor experimental ditches: II. Invertebrate community responses and recovery

    Paul J. van den Brink;René P. A. Van Wijngaarden;Wil G. H. Lucassen;Theo C. M. Brock

  • Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in laboratory studies: a review and analysis using species sensitivity distributions.

    Geoff K. Frampton;Stephan Jänsch;Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand;Jörg Römbke

  • Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. II. Zooplankton, primary producers and final conclusions.

    Unknown

  • Implications of differences between temperate and tropical freshwater ecosystems for the ecological risk assessment of pesticides

    Michiel A. Daam;Paul J. Van den Brink

  • Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. I. Water quality, breakdown of particulate organic matter and responses of macroinvertebrates.

    J. G. M. Cuppen;P. J. van den Brink;E. Camps;K. F. Uil

  • Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: Implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors: Tropical versus Temperate Species Sensitivity

    Kevin Wh Kwok;Kenneth My Leung;Gilbert Sg Lui;Vincent Kh Chu

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreu Rico
Andreu Rico University of Valencia
Theo C.M. Brock
Theo C.M. Brock Wageningen University & Research
Frederik De Laender
Frederik De Laender University of Namur
Lorraine Maltby
Lorraine Maltby University of Sheffield
Donald J. Baird
Donald J. Baird University of New Brunswick
Guang-Guo Ying
Guang-Guo Ying South China Normal University
Jörg Römbke
Jörg Römbke ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH
Volker Grimm
Volker Grimm Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Ralf B. Schäfer
Ralf B. Schäfer University of Kaiserslautern-Landau - RPTU
Roman Ashauer
Roman Ashauer University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like online geology programs offer a strong foundation in earth sciences, which complements environmental studies and enhances job prospects in fields such as environmental consulting and natural resource management.

For those seeking a broader or interdisciplinary approach, an affordable online general studies degree provides flexibility to tailor courses across various subjects, including sustainability and environmental policy, supporting a customizable career path.

Graduate students aiming to integrate social aspects with environmental work may consider the cheapest dsw program. This program enhances skills in community advocacy and social justice, critical for roles addressing environmental equity.

For undergraduates looking for manageable coursework, the easiest bachelor degree to get can sometimes include environmental-related majors, providing a practical path for those who want to enter the field without overwhelming academic demands. Exploring these options can help align educational goals with career ambitions in the growing environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Van den Brink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles