World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
5548
World Ranking
7095
National Ranking
63

Pedro Pinho publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Pinho sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 112 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Pedro Pinho D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Pinho sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro Pinho is affiliated with the University of Lisbon in Portugal and focuses their research on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans various subfields including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, global and planetary change, ecology, plant science, and nature and landscape conservation.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects related to ecosystems and urban environments. Key areas include land use and ecosystem services, plant and animal studies, urban green space and health, lichen and fungal ecology, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, geology and paleoclimatology research, and botany and plant ecology studies.

Pedro Pinho's recent publications illustrate their engagement with environmental and ecological research in urban and natural contexts. Notable papers include:

  • Using green to cool the grey: Modelling the cooling effect of green spaces with a high spatial resolution (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Functional Traits in Lichen Ecology: A Review of Challenge and Opportunity (2021), published in Microorganisms
  • Closing Water Cycles in the Built Environment through Nature-Based Solutions: The Contribution of Vertical Greening Systems and Green Roofs (2021), published in Water
  • How wild bees find a way in European cities: Pollen metabarcoding unravels multiple feeding strategies and their effects on distribution patterns in four wild bee species (2021), published in Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Research agenda on biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services in European cities (2021), published in Basic and Applied Ecology

Frequent coauthors in Pedro Pinho's work include Cristina Branquinho, Roeland Samson, Marco Moretti, Joan Casanelles-Abella, and Lauri Laanisto. The collaborative nature of their research is reflected in repeated joint publications with these colleagues.

Pedro Pinho's research has been published frequently in several scientific venues. Among these, The Science of The Total Environment stands out as a primary venue with five publications. Other common journals include Water, Basic and Applied Ecology, Environmental Pollution, and Ecological Indicators, where multiple works have also appeared.

Best Publications

  • Technical Summary: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty

    M. Allen;P. Antwi-Agyei;F. Aragon-Durand;M. Babiker

  • Working group report

    J. Strengbom;H.V. Andersen;K. Aazem;E.B. Adema

  • Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.

    Teresa Mexia;Joana Vieira;Adriana Príncipe;Andreia Anjos

  • Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks

    Joana Vieira;Paula Matos;Teresa Mexia;Teresa Mexia;Patrícia Silva

  • Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: green building materials, systems and sites

    David Pearlmutter;Dimitra Theochari;Thomas Nehls;Pedro Pinho

  • Lichen traits responding to aridity

    Paula Matos;Paula Matos;Pedro Pinho;Pedro Pinho;Gregorio Aragón;Isabel Martínez

  • Towards an integrative approach to evaluate the environmental ecosystem services provided by urban forest

    Samson Roeland;Marco Moretti;Jorge Humberto Amorim;Cristina Branquinho

  • Ecological impacts of atmospheric pollution and interactions with climate change in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mediterranean Basin: Current research and future directions

    Raúl Ochoa-Hueso;Silvana Munzi;Rocio Alonso;Maria Arroniz-Crespo

  • Using green to cool the grey: Modelling the cooling effect of green spaces with a high spatial resolution

    Filipa Grilo;Pedro Pinho;Cristiana Aleixo;Cristina Catita

  • Species richness of lichen functional groups in relation to land use intensity

    Silvia Stofer;Ariel Bergamini;Gregorio Aragón;Palmira Carvalho

  • Performance of Macrolichens and Lichen Genera as Indicators of Lichen Species Richness and Composition

    Ariel Bergamini;Christoph Scheidegger;Silvia Stofer;Palmira Carvalho

  • Biomonitoring spatial and temporal impact of atmospheric dust from a cement industry

    Cristina Branquinho;Gisela Gaio-Oliveira;Sofia Augusto;Pedro Pinho

  • The use of lichen functional groups as indicators of air quality in a Mediterranean urban environment

    Esteve Llop;Esteve Llop;Pedro Pinho;Paula Matos;Maria João Pereira

  • Modeling the provision of air-quality regulation ecosystem service provided by urban green spaces using lichens as ecological indicators.

    Paula Matos;Joana Vieira;Bernardo Rocha;Cristina Branquinho

  • Using lichen functional diversity to assess the effects of atmospheric ammonia in Mediterranean woodlands

    Pedro Pinho;Teresa Dias;Cristina Cruz;Y. Sim Tang

  • Mapping Lichen Diversity as a First Step for Air Quality Assessment

    P. Pinho;S. Augusto;C. Branquinho;A. Bio

  • Causes of change in nitrophytic and oligotrophic lichen species in a Mediterranean climate: impact of land cover and atmospheric pollutants.

    P. Pinho;S. Augusto;M.A. Martins-Loução;M.J. Pereira

  • Lichen functional groups as ecological indicators of the effects of land-use in Mediterranean ecosystems

    P. Pinho;P. Pinho;A. Bergamini;P. Carvalho;C. Branquinho

  • Which plant traits respond to aridity? A critical step to assess functional diversity in Mediterranean drylands

    Alice Nunes;Alice Nunes;Melanie Köbel;Pedro Pinho;Pedro Pinho;Paula Matos;Paula Matos

  • Lichens as ecological indicators in urban areas: beyond the effects of pollutants

    Silvana Munzi;Otilia Correia;Patricia Silva;Nuno Lopes

  • Estimation of the Allergenic Potential of Urban Trees and Urban Parks: Towards the Healthy Design of Urban Green Spaces of the Future

    Paloma Cariñanos;Filipa Grilo;Pedro Pinho;Manuel Casares-Porcel

  • Critical loads of nitrogen deposition and critical levels of atmospheric ammonia for semi-natural Mediterranean evergreen woodlands

    P. Pinho;P. Pinho;M. R. Theobald;T. Dias;Y. S. Tang

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristina Branquinho
Cristina Branquinho University of Lisbon
Cristina Máguas
Cristina Máguas University of Lisbon
Otília Correia
Otília Correia University of Lisbon
Margarida Santos-Reis
Margarida Santos-Reis University of Lisbon
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
Marco Moretti
Marco Moretti Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Roeland Samson
Roeland Samson University of Antwerp
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences
Lucy J. Sheppard
Lucy J. Sheppard UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens diverse career opportunities, and exploring related online degrees can greatly expand your professional horizons. For those interested in analytical research or data modeling in environmental science, an online degree mathematics program equips students with strong quantitative skills valuable in ecology, biology, and conservation fields.

Creative professionals inspired by nature can consider a graphic design degree online. This path is ideal for developing visual materials—like educational graphics or scientific illustrations—for ecological research and awareness campaigns.

For those seeking flexibility and broad skills, there are cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options that allow you to blend ecology with other areas such as policy, business, or communication. This approach adapts to careers in environmental consulting, nonprofit work, and sustainability.

If advancing quickly is a priority, the quickest cheapest masters degree programs offer a practical path to gaining advanced credentials and specializing in areas that complement ecological research, like history or anthropology.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro Pinho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles