World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
62
Citations
11332
World Ranking
2106
National Ranking
758

Valery E. Forbes publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valery E. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 246 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Valery E. Forbes D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valery E. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Valery E. Forbes is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several interconnected subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, and Pollution.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics such as Species Distribution and Climate Change, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Ecosystem Dynamics and Resilience, and Gut Microbiota and Health.

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Valery E. Forbes illustrate their research scope and publication record:

  • Mechanistic Effect Modeling of Earthworms in the Context of Pesticide Risk Assessment: Synthesis of the FORESEE Workshop, 2020, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Validation of Freshwater Mussel Life-History Strategies: A Database and Multivariate Analysis of Freshwater Mussel Life-History Traits, 2021, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
  • A Review of Key Features and Their Implementation in Unstructured, Structured, and Agent-Based Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment, 2020, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Pop-guide: Population Modeling Guidance, Use, Interpretation, and Development for Ecological Risk Assessment, 2020, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Three Questions to Ask Before Using Model Outputs for Decision Support, 2020, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Forbes include Maxime Vaugeois, Nika Galić, Chiara Accolla, Richard A. Brain, and Amélie Schmolke.

Their publication record shows a concentration in certain scientific journals, notably Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, with seven publications, The Science of The Total Environment with six publications, as well as contributions to Ecologies, Ecological Modelling, and Peer Community In Mathematical and Computational Biology.

Best Publications

  • The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology.

    Valery E. Forbes;Annemette Palmqvist;Lis Bach

  • Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population‐level effects in ecotoxicology?

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow

  • Ecotoxicology in Theory and Practice

    Valery E. Forbes;Thomas Forbes

  • Species Sensitivity Distributions Revisited: A Critical Appraisal

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow

  • Is hormesis an evolutionary expectation

    V. E. Forbes

  • The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help.

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow;Richard M. Sibly;Richard M. Sibly

  • Population growth rate as a basis for ecological risk assessment of toxic chemicals.

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow

  • Peer Reviewed: Does Ecotoxicology Inform Ecological Risk Assessment?

    Peter Calow;Valery E. Forbes

  • Risk assessment on the basis of simplified life-history scenarios

    Peter Calow;Richard M. Sibly;Valery E Forbes

  • Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides

    Karin M. Nienstedt;Theo C. M. Brock;Joke van Wensem;Mark Montforts

  • Consequences of a short pulse of pesticide exposure for survival and reproduction of Gammarus pulex

    Anders Cold;Valery E Forbes

  • Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow;Richard M. Sibly

  • A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology

    T. L. Forbes;V. E. Forbes

  • How do physiological responses to stress translate into ecological and evolutionary processes

    Peter Calow;Valery E Forbes

  • Extrapolation in Ecological Risk Assessment: Balancing Pragmatism and Precaution in Chemical Controls Legislation

    Valery E. Forbes;Peter Calow

  • When things don't add up: quantifying impacts of multiple stressors from individual metabolism to ecosystem processing.

    Nika Galic;Lauren L. Sullivan;Volker Grimm;Valery E. Forbes

  • TOXICANT IMPACTS ON DENSITY‐LIMITED POPULATIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEORY, PRACTICE, AND RESULTS

    Valery E. Forbes;Richard M. Sibly;Peter Calow

  • A Weight-of-Evidence Framework for Assessing Sediment (Or Other) Contamination: Improving Certainty in the Decision-Making Process

    G. Allen Burton;Graeme E. Batley;Peter M. Chapman;Valery E. Forbes

  • Clonal variation in life‐history traits and feeding rates in the gastropod, Potamopyrgus antipodarum: performance across a salinity gradient

    Rune Jacobsen;Valery E. Forbes

  • Genetics and ecotoxicology

    Valery E. Forbes

  • Ecological Models in Support of Regulatory Risk Assessments of Pesticides: Developing a Strategy for the Future (Short Communication)

    Valery E. Forbes;Udo Hommen;Pernille Thorbek;Fred Heimbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker Grimm
Volker Grimm Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Richard M. Sibly
Richard M. Sibly University of Reading
Gary Thomas Banta
Gary Thomas Banta University of Southern Denmark
Eugenia Valsami-Jones
Eugenia Valsami-Jones University of Birmingham
Michael H. Depledge
Michael H. Depledge University of Exeter
Mads C. Forchhammer
Mads C. Forchhammer University of Copenhagen
Paul J. Van den Brink
Paul J. Van den Brink Wageningen University & Research
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
Chris J. Topping
Chris J. Topping Aarhus University
Jacob Nabe-Nielsen
Jacob Nabe-Nielsen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many online programs are now available, offering flexibility for students worldwide. For example, an architect online degree can be valuable for those interested in environmental design and sustainable urban planning.

Strong mathematical skills are essential for analyzing evolutionary data and conducting ecological research. An online degree mathematics can help build these analytical abilities, improving job prospects in research, data analysis, and academia.

Ecology and Evolution professionals also benefit from communication and education skills. Those considering educational support roles may explore what is an slp in education to learn about speech-language pathology in academic settings.

Additionally, communicating research visually is important in today’s digital world. Taking online graphic design courses enables graduates to present complex environmental data clearly and compellingly, further extending their career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Valery E. Forbes

Trending Scientists