What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Biochemistry
Environmental chemistry, Bioavailability, Dynamic energy budget, Soil contamination and Soil water are his primary areas of study.
His work deals with themes such as Daphnia magna and Ecotoxicity, which intersect with Environmental chemistry.
His Dynamic energy budget research incorporates themes from Toxicant, Econometrics, Extrapolation, Software engineering and Operations research.
His Econometrics research integrates issues from Ecology, Body size, Contrast, Experimental data and Range.
His Soil contamination research focuses on Eisenia andrei and how it connects with Bioconcentration, Phenanthrene and Fluoranthene.
Tjalling Jager combines subjects such as Lactuca, Botany, Extraction and Bioaccumulation with his study of Soil water.
His most cited work include:
- Monitoring approaches to assess bioaccessibility and bioavailability of metals: matrix issues. (273 citations)
- Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES–LCA (250 citations)
- General Unified Threshold Model of Survival - a Toxicokinetic- Toxicodynamic Framework for Ecotoxicology (238 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Ecology, Environmental chemistry, Dynamic energy budget, Ecotoxicology and Soil contamination.
The concepts of his Ecology study are interwoven with issues in Organism and Zoology.
His Environmental chemistry research includes elements of Soil water and Eisenia andrei.
His study in Soil water is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Bioconcentration and Contamination.
Tjalling Jager interconnects Biological system, Extrapolation, Econometrics and Life history theory in the investigation of issues within Dynamic energy budget.
His Ecotoxicology study combines topics in areas such as Mode of action, Energy allocation, Ecosystem and Biochemical engineering.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (34.91%)
- Environmental chemistry (26.42%)
- Dynamic energy budget (23.58%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Ecology (34.91%)
- Toxicodynamics (10.38%)
- Copepod (6.60%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Toxicodynamics, Copepod, Environmental risk assessment and Toxicokinetics.
His Ecology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Zoology, Organism and Dynamic energy budget.
His research in Dynamic energy budget intersects with topics in Ecotoxicity and Life history theory.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Ecotoxicology and System dynamics in addition to Toxicodynamics.
His Copepod research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Environmental chemistry, Bioconcentration, Bioaccumulation and Partition coefficient.
His work carried out in the field of Environmental risk assessment brings together such families of science as Contrast and Econometrics.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Automated, high-throughput measurement of size and growth curves of small organisms in well plates (47 citations)
- Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology (38 citations)
- Modelling survival: exposure pattern, species sensitivity and uncertainty. (33 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Biochemistry
Tjalling Jager focuses on Ecology, Threshold model, Data set, Risk analysis and Experimental data.
His Ecology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Zoology and Lipid storage.
His Threshold model research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Range, Aquatic organisms and Survival data.
As part of his studies on Data set, Tjalling Jager often connects relevant subjects like Contrast.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
