World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michiel H. S. Kraak

Michiel H. S. Kraak

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
8732
World Ranking
4311
National Ranking
114

Michiel H. S. Kraak publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel H. S. Kraak sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 183 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michiel H. S. Kraak D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel H. S. Kraak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michiel H. S. Kraak is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics related to freshwater and aquatic environments. Main topics addressed in their research include Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes.

Michiel H. S. Kraak has contributed to multiple publications, with some recent papers highlighting different areas of environmental management and aquatic toxicology. These include:

  • Over forty years of lowland stream restoration: Lessons learned? (2020), Journal of Environmental Management
  • Herbicide Exposure and Toxicity to Aquatic Primary Producers (2020), Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
  • Occurrence, hazard, and risk of psychopharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in European surface waters (2022), Water Research
  • Advancements in effect-based surface water quality assessment (2020), Water Research
  • Eutrophication induces shifts in the trophic position of invertebrates in aquatic food webs (2020), Ecology

Their frequent co-authors include P.F.M. Verdonschot, J. Arie Vonk, Gea H. van der Lee, Milo L. de Baat, and Thomas L. ter Laak.

Publication venues where Michiel H. S. Kraak has frequently published include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Water Research, The Science of The Total Environment, Ecological Indicators, and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Do plastic particles affect microalgal photosynthesis and growth

    S.B. Sjollema;P. Redondo-Hasselerharm;H.A. Leslie;M.H.S. Kraak

  • Plastics in the Marine Environment: The Dark Side of a Modern Gift

    Jort Hammer;Michiel H. S. Kraak;Jeffrey Parsons

  • Temperature-dependent effects of cadmium on Daphnia magna: accumulation versus sensitivity.

    Evelyn H W Heugens;Tjalling Jager;Reanne Creyghton;Michiel H S Kraak

  • An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment

    J. B. Legradi;J. B. Legradi;C. Di Paolo;M. H. S. Kraak;H. G. van der Geest

  • Comparing the sensitivity of algal, cyanobacterial and bacterial bioassays to different groups of antibiotics

    Esther van der Grinten;Mariël G. Pikkemaat;Evert-Jan van den Brandhof;Gerard J. Stroomberg

  • Population growth of Daphnia magna under multiple stress conditions : joint effects of temperature, food, and cadmium

    Evelyn H. W. Heugens;Lonneke T. B. Tokkie;Michiel H. S. Kraak;A. Jan Hendriks

  • Biomonitoring of heavy metals in the Western European Rivers Rhine and Meuse using the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha

    Michiel H.S. Kraak;Martin C.Th. Scholten;Wilma H.M. Peeters;W.Chr. de Kock

  • Uptake and tissue distribution of dietary and aqueous cadmium by carp (Cyprinus carpio).

    M.H. Kraal;M.H.S. Kraak;C.J. Degroot;C. Davids

  • Translocation of microbenthic algal assemblages used for In situ analysis of metal pollution in rivers

    N. Ivorra;J. Hettelaar;G. M. J. Tubbing;M. H. S. Kraak

  • Differences in the sensitivity of benthic microalgae to ZN and CD regarding biofilm development and exposure history

    Núria Ivorra;Simone Bremer;Helena Guasch;Michiel H.S. Kraak

  • Trace metals in a littoral foodweb: concentrations in organisms, sediment and water.

    K.R. Timmermans;B. Van Hattum;M.H.S. Kraak;C. Davids

  • Toxicity of azaarenes.

    Eric A J Bleeker;Saskia Wiegman;Pim de Voogt;Michiel Kraak

  • Species and river specific effects of river fragmentation on European anadromous fish species

    Peter J.T.M. van Puijenbroek;Peter J.T.M. van Puijenbroek;Anthonie D. Buijse;Michiel H.S. Kraak;Piet F.M. Verdonschot

  • Bioconcentration of organic chemicals: is a solid-phase microextraction fiber a good surrogate for biota?

    Heather A. Leslie;Thomas L. Ter Laak;Frans J. M. Busser;Michiel H. S. Kraak

  • Habitat selection by chironomid larvae: fast growth requires fast food

    Elske M. De Haas;Coen Wagner;Albert A. Koelmans;Michiel H. S. Kraak

  • Mixture toxicity of copper and diazinon to larvae of the mayfly (Ephoron virgo) judging additivity at different effect levels.

    Harm G. van der Geest;Gerdit D. Greve;Marie-Elen Boivin;Michiel H. S. Kraak

  • Ecotoxicity of mixtures of metals to the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha

    Michiel H.S. Kraak;Daphna Lavy;Hans Schoon;Merel Toussaint

  • Short-term effects of metals on the filtration rate of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha.

    Michiel H.S. Kraak;Merel Toussaint;Daphna Lavy;C. Davids

  • Chronic ecotoxicity of copper and cadmium to the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha.

    Michiel H. S. Kraak;Daphna Lavy;Wilma H. M. Peeters;C. Davids

  • Persistence, Bioaccumulation, and Toxicity of Halogen-Free Flame Retardants

    Susanne L. Waaijers;Deguo Kong;Hester S. Hendriks;Cynthia A. de Wit

  • Modeling responses of Daphnia magna to pesticide pulse exposure under varying food conditions: intrinsic versus apparent sensitivity.

    Barry J. Pieters;Tjalling Jager;Michiel H. S. Kraak;Wim Admiraal

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Admiraal
Wim Admiraal University of Amsterdam
Piet F. M. Verdonschot
Piet F. M. Verdonschot Wageningen University & Research
Pim de Voogt
Pim de Voogt University of Amsterdam
Albert A. Koelmans
Albert A. Koelmans Wageningen University & Research
Joop L. M. Hermens
Joop L. M. Hermens Utrecht University
Cornelis A.M. van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. van Gestel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nico M. van Straalen
Nico M. van Straalen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anton M. Breure
Anton M. Breure Radboud University
Beate I. Escher
Beate I. Escher Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Christian Mulder
Christian Mulder University of Catania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Programs like online geology programs provide a strong foundation in earth sciences, essential for understanding environmental processes and resource management.

If you're seeking flexible study options or complementary skills, consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs. These allow students to customize their education while keeping costs manageable.

For professionals aiming to make an impact through social services related to environmental justice and community health, online DSW programs in social work offer advanced expertise and leadership skills that complement environmental studies careers.

When selecting a degree path, some students prioritize ease and flexibility. Researching the easiest degree to get can provide insights into programs that fit busy schedules without compromising educational value.

Best Scientists Citing Michiel H. S. Kraak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles