World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
53
Citations
7663
World Ranking
2952
National Ranking
141

Jim Buttle publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Buttle sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 147 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Jim Buttle D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Buttle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim Buttle is affiliated with Trent University in Canada and specializes in Environmental Science with a significant focus on Water Science and Technology. Their scholarly output encompasses multiple subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's research primarily centers on topics related to Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, with substantial work in Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics. Additional topics covered in their publications include Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Cryospheric Studies and Observations, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Tree-ring Climate Responses.

Jim Buttle has published extensively in various scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Hydrological Processes
  • The Forestry Chronicle
  • Water
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Forest Ecology and Management

Their recent papers cover a range of hydrological topics. Some notable publications are:

  • Stable isotopes of water reveal differences in plant - soil water relationships across northern environments, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • Co-evolution of xylem water and soil water stable isotopic composition in a northern mixed forest biome, 2021, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Travel times for snowmelt-dominated headwater catchments: Influences of wetlands and forest harvesting, and linkages to stream water quality, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • Long-term stream chemistry response to harvesting in a northern hardwood forest watershed experiencing environmental change, 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Development of an inexpensive automated streamflow monitoring system, 2020, Hydrological Processes

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Jason A. Leach
  • Kara L. Webster
  • Ryan Bullock
  • Jiaxin Chen
  • Andrew Kenney

Best Publications

  • Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins

    Unknown

  • Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin

    D. L. Peters;J. M. Buttle;C. H. Taylor;B. D. LaZerte

  • Hydrologic coupling of slopes, riparian zones and streams: an example from the Canadian Shield

    J.M Buttle;P.J Dillon;G.R Eerkes

  • Tracer-based assessment of flow paths, storage and runoff generation in northern catchments: a review

    Doerthe Tetzlaff;Jim Buttle;Sean K. Carey;Kevin McGuire

  • Changing forest water yields in response to climate warming: results from long‐term experimental watershed sites across North America

    Irena F. Creed;Adam T. Spargo;Julia A. Jones;Jim M. Buttle

  • Flood processes in Canada: Regional and special aspects

    James M. Buttle;Diana M. Allen;Daniel Caissie;Bruce Davison

  • Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope

    J. M. Buttle;D. J. McDonald

  • Cross‐regional prediction of long‐term trajectory of stream water DOC response to climate change

    Hjalmar Laudon;Jim Buttle;Sean K. Carey;Jeff McDonnell;Jeff McDonnell

  • Influence of seasonal changes in runoff and extreme events on dissolved organic carbon trends in wetland- and upland-draining streams

    M Catherine Eimers;Jim Buttle;Shaun A Watmough

  • Measuring and Modeling Stable Isotopes of Mobile and Bulk Soil Water

    Matthias Sprenger;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Jim Buttle;Hjalmar Laudon

  • Advances in Canadian forest hydrology, 1995–1998

    J. M. Buttle;I. F. Creed;J. W. Pomeroy

  • Inter-comparison of hydro-climatic regimes across northern catchments: synchronicity, resistance and resilience

    Sean K. Carey;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Jan Seibert;Jan Seibert;Christopher Soulsby

  • Impacts of clearcut harvesting on snow accumulation and melt in a northern hardwood forest

    C.D. Murray;J.M. Buttle

  • Mapping first-order controls on streamflow from drainage basins: the T3 template

    Jim Buttle

  • Long-term trends in dissolved organic carbon concentration: a cautionary note

    M. Catherine Eimers;Shaun A. Watmough;James M. Buttle

  • Boreal forest disturbance and streamflow response, northeastern Ontario

    J M Buttle;R A Metcalfe

  • Spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in shallow macroporous soils in a forested basin

    J.M. Buttle;D.A. House

  • An Overview of Temporary Stream Hydrology in Canada

    James M Buttle;Sarah Boon;D L Peters;Christopher Spence

  • Stable isotopes of water reveal differences in plant – soil water relationships across northern environments

    Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;James Buttle;Sean K. Carey;Matthew J. Kohn

  • Save northern high-latitude catchments

    Hjalmar Laudon;Christopher Spence;Jim Buttle;Sean K. Carey

  • Thermal stratification patterns in urban ponds and their relationships with vertical nutrient gradients.

    Keunyea Song;Marguerite A. Xenopoulos;James M. Buttle;Jiri Marsalek

  • INFERRING HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A TEMPERATE BASIN USING ISOTOPIC AND GEOCHEMICAL HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION: A RE-EVALUATION

    J. M. Buttle;D. L. Peters

Frequent Co-Authors

Doerthe Tetzlaff
Doerthe Tetzlaff Leibniz Association
Chris Soulsby
Chris Soulsby University of Aberdeen
Hjalmar Laudon
Hjalmar Laudon Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Sean K. Carey
Sean K. Carey McMaster University
Jeffrey J. McDonnell
Jeffrey J. McDonnell University of Saskatchewan
Jan Seibert
Jan Seibert University of Zurich
Kevin J. McGuire
Kevin J. McGuire Virginia Tech
Irena F. Creed
Irena F. Creed University of Toronto
James P. McNamara
James P. McNamara Boise State University
Christopher Spence
Christopher Spence Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse opportunities, and many students explore complementary online degrees to enhance their expertise. For older adults looking to advance their education, the degrees for older adults resource highlights flexible programs designed to fit different life stages and schedules.

Professionals interested in environmental data or archival work may also consider earning a master’s degree in library science. Programs like the library science masters provide essential skills in managing scientific information and research resources effectively.

Those aiming for specialization in information management related to Earth Science can benefit from pursuing an ala-accredited program, ensuring recognized credibility and robust professional preparation.

Additionally, careers intersecting with environmental communication and documentation may find value in the visual aspects of digital media. Exploring the digital photography degree online can provide skills to capture and present Earth Science phenomena effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Buttle

Trending Scientists