World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
70865
World Ranking
6888
National Ranking
3632

Wayne H. Giles publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne H. Giles sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 224 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Wayne H. Giles D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne H. Giles sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wayne H. Giles is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research spans several areas within public health, focusing notably on policy, vaccine coverage, and gender studies.

The main fields of study associated with their work include Health Professions and Social Sciences. Within these broader fields, their subfields of study emphasize General Health Professions, Gender Studies, and Health. Their research contributions address topics such as Public Health Policies and Education, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies, and Feminist Theory and Gender Studies.

Wayne H. Giles has published research in multiple venues, including the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice and Public Health Reports. Two recent papers exemplify the scope and thematic focus of their work:

  • "COVID-19 Vaccine Policy Implementation and Differential Vaccine Uptake Trajectories in Chicago Communities," published in 2023 in the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
  • "A Statement of Commitment to Zero Tolerance of Harassment and Discrimination in Schools and Programs of Public Health," published in 2020 in Public Health Reports

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Wayne H. Giles include Sage J. Kim, Noah McWhirter, Kelly Duong, Manorama M. Khare, and Sanjib Basu. These collaborations indicate a network of researchers engaged in areas closely related to public health management and social issues within health professions.

Their research interests reflect interdisciplinary approaches that combine health professions expertise with social sciences frameworks to explore complex public health issues such as vaccine hesitancy, health outcomes in primary care, and the intersection of gender and victimization studies.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome Among US Adults: Findings From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Earl S. Ford;Wayne H. Giles;William H. Dietz

  • The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood: A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology

    Robert F Anda;Vincent J Felitti;J Douglas Bremner;John D Walker

  • Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000

    Earl S. Ford;Umed A. Ajani;Janet B. Croft;Julia A. Critchley

  • Childhood Abuse, Household Dysfunction, and the Risk of Attempted Suicide Throughout the Life Span Findings From the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study

    Shanta R. Dube;Robert F. Anda;Vincent J. Felitti;Daniel P. Chapman

  • Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: The adverse childhood experiences study

    Shanta R. Dube;Vincent J. Felitti;Maxia Dong;Daniel P. Chapman

  • Sudden Cardiac Death in the United States, 1989 to 1998

    Zhi-Jie Zheng;Janet B. Croft;Wayne H. Giles;George A. Mensah

  • Increasing Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome Among U.S. Adults

    Earl S. Ford;Wayne H. Giles;Ali H. Mokdad

  • The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction

    Maxia Dong;Robert F Anda;Vincent J Felitti;Shanta R Dube

  • Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality

    David W. Brown;Robert F. Anda;Henning Tiemeier;Vincent J. Felitti

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences and Smoking During Adolescence and Adulthood

    Robert F. Anda;Janet B. Croft;Vincent J. Felitti;Dale Nordenberg

  • Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim

    Shanta R. Dube;Robert F. Anda;Charles L. Whitfield;David W. Brown

  • Insights Into Causal Pathways for Ischemic Heart Disease Adverse Childhood Experiences Study

    Maxia Dong;Wayne H. Giles;Vincent J. Felitti;Shanta R. Dube

  • The impact of adverse childhood experiences on health problems: evidence from four birth cohorts dating back to 1900.

    Shanta R Dube;Vincent J Felitti;Maxia Dong;Wayne H Giles

  • A Comparison of the Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome Using Two Proposed Definitions

    Earl S. Ford;Wayne H. Giles

  • Adverse childhood experiences and the association with ever using alcohol and initiating alcohol use during adolescence

    Shanta R. Dube;Jacqueline W. Miller;David W. Brown;Wayne H. Giles

  • Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2011.

    Ruth Jiles;Elizabeth Hughes;Wilmon Murphy;Nicole Flowers

  • Growing up with parental alcohol abuse: exposure to childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction

    Shanta R Dube;Robert F Anda;Vincent J Felitti;Janet B Croft

  • Hospitalization of patients with heart failure: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1985 to 1995.

    Gail A. Haldeman;Janet B. Croft;Wayne H. Giles;Ali Rashidee

  • The relationship of exposure to childhood sexual abuse to other forms of abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction during childhood.

    Maxia Dong;Robert F Anda;Shanta R Dube;Wayne H Giles

  • Associations between recommended levels of physical activity and health-related quality of life. Findings from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey

    David W Brown;Lina S Balluz;Gregory W Heath;David G Moriarty

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet B. Croft
Janet B. Croft Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Earl S. Ford
Earl S. Ford North Carolina State University
Robert F. Anda
Robert F. Anda Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Ali H. Mokdad
Ali H. Mokdad University of Washington
Steven J. Kittner
Steven J. Kittner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Vincent J. Felitti
Vincent J. Felitti University of California, San Diego
George A. Mensah
George A. Mensah National Institutes of Health
Richard F. Macko
Richard F. Macko University of Maryland, Baltimore
Chaoyang Li
Chaoyang Li Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Valerie J. Edwards
Valerie J. Edwards Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in medicine or healthcare, exploring alternative online degrees can open diverse pathways within the field. Programs like accelerated lpn program options allow students to fast-track their way into nursing roles, providing quicker entry to the workforce.

Mental health is another high-demand area. The fast track mental health nursing programs offer online MSN degrees for those aiming to specialize rapidly in psychiatric and mental health care.

For students interested in the business side of healthcare, the best online mha programs provide a strong foundation in healthcare administration leadership. These programs prepare graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Cost is a key consideration. Exploring a masters in healthcare administration cost comparison can help prospective students identify programs that are both affordable and reputable, ensuring a solid return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne H. Giles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles