World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David P. Kreutzweiser

David P. Kreutzweiser

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
8994
World Ranking
7249
National Ranking
451

David P. Kreutzweiser publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Kreutzweiser sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David P. Kreutzweiser D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Kreutzweiser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Kreutzweiser is affiliated with Natural Resources Canada in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their scholarly work explores key topics such as Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Fire effects on ecosystems, Soil erosion and sediment transport, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies.

Recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • Forest management impacts on stream integrity at varying intensities and spatial scales: Do abiotic effects accumulate spatially? (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Forest management impacts on stream integrity at varying intensities and spatial scales: Do biological effects accumulate spatially? (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Forest management influences the effects of streamside wet areas on stream ecosystems (2020, Ecological Applications)
  • Changes in streamside riparian forest canopy and leaf litter nutrient flux to soils during an emerald ash borer infestation in an agricultural landscape (2020, Biological Invasions)
  • Elevated Allochthony in Stream Food Webs as a Result of Longitudinal Cumulative Effects of Forest Management (2021, Ecosystems)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Kreutzweiser include:

  • Karen A. Kidd
  • Maitane Erdozain
  • Erik J. S. Emilson
  • Scott S. Capell
  • Michelle A. Gray

Key publication venues for their work include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecosystems
  • Biological Invasions
  • Ecological Applications
  • Freshwater Biology

Their research contributes to understanding the ecological and environmental dynamics of forest and freshwater systems, particularly focusing on the effects of forest management on stream ecosystems and nutrient fluxes. This work often combines field studies and ecological assessments to assess cumulative effects and nutrient dynamics in natural landscapes affected by both biological and abiotic factors.

Best Publications

  • Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites

    N. Simon-Delso;N. Simon-Delso;V. Amaral-Rogers;L. P. Belzunces;J. M. Bonmatin

  • Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil

    J.-M. Bonmatin;C. Giorio;V. Girolami;D. Goulson

  • Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates

    L. W. Pisa;V. Amaral-Rogers;L. P. Belzunces;J. M. Bonmatin

  • Pesticides néonicotinoïdes. Tendances, usages et modes d’action des métabolites

    N. Simon-Delso;V. Amaral-Rogers;L. P. Belzunces;Jean-Marc Bonmatin

  • Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services

    Madeleine Chagnon;David Kreutzweiser;Edward A.D. Mitchell;Christy A. Morrissey

  • Effets des néonicotinoïdes et du fipronil sur les invertébrés

    L. W. Pisa;V. Amaral-Rogers;L. P. Belzunces;Jean-Marc Bonmatin

  • Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: A review

    David P. KreutzweiserD.P. Kreutzweiser;David P. KreutzweiserD.P. Kreutzweiser;Paul W. HazlettP.W. Hazlett;Paul W. HazlettP.W. Hazlett;John M. GunnJ.M. Gunn;John M. GunnJ.M. Gunn

  • Conclusions of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

    J.P. Van der Sluijs;J.P. Van der Sluijs;V. Amaral-Rogers;L.P. Belzunces;M. F. I. J. Bijleveld van Lexmond

  • Fine sediment deposition in streams after selective forest harvesting without riparian buffers

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Scott S. Capell

  • Alternatives to neonicotinoid insecticides for pest control: case studies in agriculture and forestry

    Lorenzo Furlan;David Kreutzweiser

  • Non-target effects on aquatic decomposer organisms of imidacloprid as a systemic insecticide to control emerald ash borer in riparian trees

    David Kreutzweiser;Kevin Good;Derek Chartrand;Taylor Scarr

  • Effects of fine sediment inputs from a logging road on stream insect communities:a large-scale experimental approach in a Canadian headwater stream

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Scott S. Capell;Kevin P. Good

  • Impacts and prognosis of natural resource development on water and wetlands in Canada’s boreal zone1

    Kara L. Webster;Frederick D. Beall;Irena F. Creed;David P. Kreutzweiser

  • Leaf-litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in boreal forest streams linked to upland logging disturbance

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Kevin P. Good;Scott S. Capell;Stephen B. Holmes

  • Macroinvertebrate community responses to selection logging in riparian and upland areas of headwater catchments in a northern hardwood forest

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Scott S. Capell;Kevin P. Good

  • Nontarget Effects of Neem-Based Insecticides on Aquatic Invertebrates

    David P. Kreutzweiser

  • Imidacloprid in leaves from systemically treated trees may inhibit litter breakdown by non-target invertebrates.

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Dean G. Thompson;Taylor A. Scarr

  • Impacts and prognosis of natural resource development on aquatic biodiversity in Canada's boreal zone 1

    David Kreutzweiser;Frederick Beall;Kara Webster;Dean Thompson

  • Effects on litter-dwelling earthworms and microbial decomposition of soil-applied imidacloprid for control of wood-boring insects.

    David P Kreutzweiser;Kevin P Good;Derek T Chartrand;Taylor A Scarr

  • Are leaves that fall from imidacloprid-treated maple trees to control Asian longhorned beetles toxic to non-target decomposer organisms?

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Kevin P. Good;Derek T. Chartrand;Taylor A. Scarr

  • Stream temperature responses to partial-harvest logging in riparian buffers of boreal mixedwood forest watersheds.

    David P. KreutzweiserD.P. Kreutzweiser;Scott S. CapellS.S. Capell;Stephen B. HolmesS.B. Holmes

  • Introduction and a theoretical basis for using disturbance by forest management activities to sustain aquatic ecosystems

    David P. Kreutzweiser;Paul K. Sibley;John S. Richardson;Andrew M. Gordon

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul K. Sibley
Paul K. Sibley University of Guelph
Karen A. Kidd
Karen A. Kidd McMaster University
Matthias Liess
Matthias Liess Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Edward A. D. Mitchell
Edward A. D. Mitchell University of Neuchâtel
Irena F. Creed
Irena F. Creed University of Toronto
Josef Settele
Josef Settele Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
John S. Richardson
John S. Richardson University of British Columbia
John M. Gunn
John M. Gunn Laurentian University
Lisa A. Venier
Lisa A. Venier Natural Resources Canada
Dave Goulson
Dave Goulson University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open the door to various interdisciplinary career pathways, especially when paired with further education or certifications. Many students interested in science may eventually consider careers in healthcare, research, or education, which are growing fields with flexible study options.

There are numerous online nursing degree programs that attract students from diverse science backgrounds. For instance, those looking to advance their nursing credentials can explore asn to fnp programs or transition from an associate degree to a family nurse practitioner qualification. Career changers or individuals with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree might be interested in direct entry msn programs that streamline the process of entering nursing.

Selecting the right school is also crucial. Comparing the best value nursing education online wgu can help students find programs that suit both their educational needs and budgets. If you already hold a BSN, many convenient and bsn to msn programs online are available, making it easier to advance within the healthcare industry.

Whether your interest is in environmental health, public policy, or direct patient care, exploring online degrees and bridge programs can expand your career opportunities and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Kreutzweiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles