World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7246
World Ranking
7380
National Ranking
2629

Michelle L. Hladik publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle L. Hladik sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Michelle L. Hladik D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle L. Hladik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle L. Hladik is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple areas within environmental science, with a particular focus on the intersection of insect and pesticide studies, environmental toxicology, and agricultural ecosystems.

The scientist's work covers several main fields of study including Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these broader domains, key subfields of study they address are Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Insect Science, Pollution, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Plant Science.

The primary topics of research for Michelle L. Hladik include:

  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Frequent publishing venues highlight the scientist's engagement with leading journals in environmental science, including:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Chemosphere
  • PLoS ONE

Michelle L. Hladik has collaborated extensively with several co-authors who contribute to similar research areas. Frequent co-authors include Dana W. Kolpin, Kelly L. Smalling, Michael S. Gross, Paul M. Bradley, and Carrie E. Givens.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health" (2020) published in Environmental Science Processes & Impacts
  • "Beyond neonicotinoids - Wild pollinators are exposed to a range of pesticides while foraging in agroecosystems" (2020) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Pesticide exposure of wild bees and honey bees foraging from field border flowers in intensively managed agriculture areas" (2022) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Widespread Use of the Nitrification Inhibitor Nitrapyrin: Assessing Benefits and Costs to Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environmental Health" (2021) published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA" (2020) published in The Science of The Total Environment

This body of work illustrates Michelle L. Hladik's consistent focus on understanding the environmental impact of pesticides and chemical exposures, particularly on insects and pollinators, within agricultural and aquatic systems. Their research contributes to environmental toxicology by examining pesticide fate, toxicity, and ecological interactions.

Best Publications

  • Environmental risks and challenges associated with neonicotinoid insecticides

    Michelle L. Hladik;Anson R. Main;Dave Goulson

  • Widespread occurrence of neonicotinoid insecticides in streams in a high corn and soybean producing region, USA.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Dana W. Kolpin;Kathryn M. Kuivila

  • A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: Current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health

    Darrin A. Thompson;Hans Joachim Lehmler;Dana W. Kolpin;Michelle L. Hladik

  • Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams

    Paul M. Bradley;Celeste A. Journey;Kristin M. Romanok;Larry B. Barber

  • Occurrence of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Finished Drinking Water and Fate during Drinking Water Treatment

    Kathryn L. Klarich;Nicholas C. Pflug;Eden M. DeWald;Michelle L. Hladik

  • Urban Stormwater: An Overlooked Pathway of Extensive Mixed Contaminants to Surface and Groundwaters in the United States.

    Jason R. Masoner;Dana W. Kolpin;Isabelle M. Cozzarelli;Larry B. Barber

  • First national-scale reconnaissance of neonicotinoid insecticides in streams across the USA

    Michelle L. Hladik;Dana W. Kolpin

  • Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Mark Vandever;Kelly L. Smalling

  • Occurrence and potential sources of pyrethroid insecticides in stream sediments from seven U.S. metropolitan areas.

    Kathryn M. Kuivila;Michelle L. Hladik;Christopher G. Ingersoll;Nile E. Kemble

  • Year-round presence of neonicotinoid insecticides in tributaries to the Great Lakes, USA.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Steven R. Corsi;Dana W. Kolpin;Austin K. Baldwin

  • Complex mixtures of dissolved pesticides show potential aquatic toxicity in a synoptic study of Midwestern U.S. streams

    Lisa H. Nowell;Patrick W. Moran;Travis S. Schmidt;Julia E. Norman

  • Discharges of produced waters from oil and gas extraction via wastewater treatment plants are sources of disinfection by-products to receiving streams.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Michael J. Focazio;Mark Engle;Mark Engle

  • Pesticide concentrations in frog tissue and wetland habitats in a landscape dominated by agriculture.

    Kelly L. Smalling;Rebecca A. Reeves;Erin Muths;Mark Vandever

  • Increasing neonicotinoid use and the declining butterfly fauna of lowland California.

    Matthew L. Forister;Bruce Cousens;Joshua G. Harrison;Kayce Anderson

  • A multi-residue method for the analysis of pesticides and pesticide degradates in water using HLB solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Kelly L. Smalling;Kathryn M. Kuivila

  • Pesticide exposure of wild bees and honey bees foraging from field border flowers in intensively managed agriculture areas.

    Unknown

  • Chlorinated Byproducts of Neonicotinoids and Their Metabolites: An Unrecognized Human Exposure Potential?

    Kathryn L. Klarich Wong;Danielle T. Webb;Matthew R. Nagorzanski;Dana W. Kolpin

  • Neutral chloroacetamide herbicide degradates and related compounds in Midwestern United States drinking water sources.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Edward J. Bouwer;A. Lynn Roberts

  • Assessing the occurrence and distribution of pyrethroids in water and suspended sediments.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Kathryn M. Kuivila

  • Beyond neonicotinoids - Wild pollinators are exposed to a range of pesticides while foraging in agroecosystems.

    Anson R. Main;Michelle L. Hladik;Elisabeth B. Webb;Keith W. Goyne

  • Pyrethroid insecticide concentrations and toxicity in streambed sediments and loads in surface waters of the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA

    Joseph L. Domagalski;Donald P. Weston;Minghua Zhang;Michelle L. Hladik

  • Are neutral chloroacetamide herbicide degradates of potential environmental concern? Analysis and occurrence in the upper Chesapeake Bay.

    Michelle L. Hladik;Jonie J. Hsiao;A. Lynn Roberts

  • Analysis of the herbicide diuron, three diuron degradates, and six neonicotinoid insecticides in water-Method details and application to two Georgia streams

    Michelle L. Hladik;Daniel L. Calhoun

  • Removal of neutral chloroacetamide herbicide degradates during simulated unit processes for drinking water treatment.

    Michelle L. Hladik;A. Lynn Roberts;Edward J. Bouwer

Frequent Co-Authors

Dana W. Kolpin
Dana W. Kolpin United States Geological Survey
Paul M. Bradley
Paul M. Bradley United States Geological Survey
Michael T. Meyer
Michael T. Meyer United States Geological Survey
Edward T. Furlong
Edward T. Furlong United States Geological Survey
Christopher P. Higgins
Christopher P. Higgins Colorado School of Mines
Barbara J. Mahler
Barbara J. Mahler United States Geological Survey
Larry B. Barber
Larry B. Barber United States Geological Survey
R. Blaine McCleskey
R. Blaine McCleskey United States Geological Survey
William A. Battaglin
William A. Battaglin United States Geological Survey
Edward J. Bouwer
Edward J. Bouwer Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse and impactful career paths. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing online geology programs provides a strong foundation in understanding natural phenomena and resource management.

Geospatial technology plays a vital role in environmental analysis. Programs recognized among the best GIS programs in the US equip students with skills to analyze spatial data, crucial for urban planning, conservation efforts, and disaster response.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy, a one-year administrative degree can be highly beneficial. The efficiency and flexibility of a 1 year MPA online helps professionals gain management and leadership skills without a long-term commitment.

Environmental challenges are deeply intertwined with social factors. Earning an online degree in sociology from the best online sociology bachelor degree programs provides insights into human behavior and societal structures, enhancing the ability to address community-focused sustainability issues.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle L. Hladik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles