World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5424
World Ranking
13933
National Ranking
889

Tim Ellis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Ellis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tim Ellis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Ellis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Ellis is affiliated with Kingston University in the United Kingdom and primarily conducts research in the field of Engineering, with specific emphasis on Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry. Their work spans various specialized subfields, including General Health Professions, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their recent publications reflect a strong focus on advancements in battery materials and retinal imaging technologies, demonstrating engagement with both applied engineering and medical imaging domains. Key topics covered in their research include:

  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

Their published papers include the following notable works:

  • Automated Microaneurysms Detection in Retinal Images Using Radon Transform and Supervised Learning: Application to Mass Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy (2021), IEEE Access
  • Effects of micro-alloying with lead for battery grid material (2022), Journal of Energy Storage
  • Growth Mechanisms of Nano-to Micro-Sized Lead Sulfate Particles (2021), ACS Omega
  • Novel characterization of lead-based micro-alloys for battery applications (2021), Journal of Energy Storage
  • Phase transitions above the upper critical dimension (2022), SciPost Physics Lecture Notes

Research publication venues where Tim Ellis frequently appears include:

  • Journal of Energy Storage
  • IEEE Access
  • ACS Omega
  • SciPost Physics Lecture Notes
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaboration forms an important part of their research activity, working multiple times with specific coauthors such as:

  • Michael T. Wall
  • Travis Hesterberg
  • Marcus L. Young
  • Yang Ren
  • Jesse Smith

Best Publications

  • Image difference threshold strategies and shadow detection

    Paul L. Rosin;Tim Ellis

  • Bridging the gaps between cameras

    D. Makris;T. Ellis;J. Black

  • Learning semantic scene models from observing activity in visual surveillance

    D. Makris;T. Ellis

  • Multi view image surveillance and tracking

    J. Black;T. Ellis;P. Rosin

  • A novel method for video tracking performance evaluation

    J. Black;T. Ellis;P. Rosin

  • Vehicle detection, tracking and classification in urban traffic

    Zezhi Chen;Tim Ellis;Sergio A Velastin

  • Path detection in video surveillance

    Dimitrios Makris;Tim Ellis

  • Active video-based surveillance system: the low-level image and video processing techniques needed for implementation

    G.L. Foresti;C. Micheloni;L. Snidaro;P. Remagnino

  • Multi camera image tracking

    James Black;Tim Ellis

  • Automatic learning of an activity-based semantic scene model

    D. Makris;T. Ellis

  • A self-adaptive Gaussian mixture model

    Zezhi Chen;Tim Ellis

  • Performance metrics and methods for tracking in surveillance

    T. Ellis

  • Ellipse detection and matching with uncertainty

    Tim Ellis;Ahmed Abbood;Beatrice Brillault

  • Spatial and Probabilistic Modelling of Pedestrian Behaviour

    Dimitrios Makris;Tim Ellis

  • Multi-camera image measurement and correspondence

    James Black;Tim Ellis

  • Partial Observation vs. Blind Tracking through Occlusion

    Ming Xu;Tim Ellis

  • Recognizing hand gesture using Fourier descriptors

    P.R.G. Harding;T. Ellis

  • Model-based vision for automatic alarm interpretation

    T.J. Ellis;P.L. Rosin;P. Golton

  • Illumination-Invariant motion detection using colour mixture models

    Ming Xu;Tim Ellis

  • Vehicle type categorization: A comparison of classification schemes

    Zezhi Chen;Tim Ellis;Sergio A Velastin

  • Active Video-Based Surveillance System

    Gian Luca Foresti;Christian Micheloni;Lauro Snidaro;Paolo Remagnino

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergio A. Velastin
Sergio A. Velastin Queen Mary University of London
Paul L. Rosin
Paul L. Rosin Cardiff University
Paolo Remagnino
Paolo Remagnino Durham University
Gian Luca Foresti
Gian Luca Foresti University of Udine
Shancang Li
Shancang Li University of the West of England
Christian Micheloni
Christian Micheloni University of Udine
Majid Mirmehdi
Majid Mirmehdi University of Bristol
Simon J. Godsill
Simon J. Godsill University of Cambridge
James McNames
James McNames Portland State University
David M. Alexander
David M. Alexander Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of career paths and academic opportunities. For those looking to broaden their expertise, many students also explore fields closely tied to technology and innovation.

Online degrees can help accelerate your learning—and, in particular, a computer science degree online may allow for greater flexibility and affordability. Other popular online technical programs include an online degree in mechanical engineering and the environmental engineering degree. These programs prepare graduates for careers in various high-demand sectors like robotics, automotive design, and sustainable infrastructure.

If your interests lie in the intersection of technology and the environment, pursuing an environmental science degree can also lead to rewarding roles in research, policy, and industry. By exploring these related online degrees and career pathways, you can tailor your education to meet your unique goals in the modern job market.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Ellis

Trending Scientists