World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
10656
World Ranking
7835
National Ranking
3389

Nader Mohamed publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nader Mohamed sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 236 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nader Mohamed D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nader Mohamed sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nader Mohamed is affiliated with California University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research focuses extensively on the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with numerous contributions spanning both disciplines.

Their primary subfields of study include Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, and Information Systems, alongside work related to Software and Health Information Management.

Research topics addressed by Nader Mohamed emphasize Digital Transformation in Industry, IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Manufacturing Process and Optimization, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, and Quality and Safety in Healthcare.

Frequent co-authors in their work are Jameela Al-Jaroodi, Imad Jawhar, Nader Kesserwan, Sanja Lazarova-Molnar, and Zulfiqar Ahmad.

Their papers have been published in multiple venues, with notable frequency in:

  • IEEE Access
  • 2022 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)
  • Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks
  • Computers in Industry
  • Electronics

Noteworthy recent publications include:

  • A framework for data-driven digital twins of smart manufacturing systems, 2021, Computers in Industry
  • Health 4.0: On the Way to Realizing the Healthcare of the Future, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Leveraging Digital Twins for Healthcare Systems Engineering, 2023, IEEE Access
  • Applications of Integrated IoT-Fog-Cloud Systems to Smart Cities: A Survey, 2021, Electronics
  • Cyber-Physical Systems Forensics: Today and Tomorrow, 2020, Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks

Best Publications

  • Applications of big data to smart cities

    Eiman Al Nuaimi;Hind Al Neyadi;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

  • Middleware: middleware challenges and approaches for wireless sensor networks

    S. Hadim;N. Mohamed

  • Blockchain in Industries: A Survey

    Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Nader Mohamed

  • A Survey of Load Balancing in Cloud Computing: Challenges and Algorithms

    Klaithem Al Nuaimi;Nader Mohamed;Mariam Al Nuaimi;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

  • Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities

    Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Imad Jawhar;Ahmed Idries

  • UAVs for smart cities: Opportunities and challenges

    Farhan Mohammed;Ahmed Idries;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

  • e-Health Cloud: Opportunities and Challenges

    Eman AbuKhousa;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

  • A hierarchical and topological classification of linear sensor networks

    Imad Jawhar;Nader Mohamed

  • Challenges in middleware solutions for the internet of things

    Moumena A. Chaqfeh;Nader Mohamed

  • Communication and networking of UAV-based systems: Classification and associated architectures ☆

    Imad Jawhar;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Dharma P. Agrawal

  • Middleware for Robotics: A Survey

    N. Mohamed;J. Al-Jaroodi;I. Jawhar

  • Linear wireless sensor networks: Classification and applications

    Imad Jawhar;Nader Mohamed;Dharma P. Agrawal

  • Health 4.0: On the Way to Realizing the Healthcare of the Future

    Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Nader Mohamed;Eman Abukhousa

  • A framework for pipeline infrastructure monitoring using wireless sensor networks

    I. Jawhar;N. Mohamed;K. Shuaib

  • A Framework for Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Data Collection in Linear Wireless Sensor Networks

    Imad Jawhar;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Sheng Zhang

  • SmartCityWare: A Service-Oriented Middleware for Cloud and Fog Enabled Smart City Services

    Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Imad Jawhar;Sanja Lazarova-Molnar

  • An Architecture for Using Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in Wireless Sensor Networks for Underwater Pipeline Monitoring

    Imad Jawhar;Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Sheng Zhang

  • Real-time big data analytics: Applications and challenges

    Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

  • Sensor network architectures for monitoring underwater pipelines.

    Nader Mohamed;Imad Jawhar;Jameela Al-Jaroodi;Liren Zhang

  • Middleware for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey

    S. Hadim;N. Mohamed

  • Applying Blockchain in Industry 4.0 Applications

    Nader Mohamed;Jameela Al-Jaroodi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jameela Al-Jaroodi
Jameela Al-Jaroodi Robert Morris University
Imad Jawhar
Imad Jawhar Al Maaref University
Hong Jiang
Hong Jiang The University of Texas at Arlington
Jie Wu
Jie Wu Temple University
Dharma P. Agrawal
Dharma P. Agrawal University of Cincinnati
Byrav Ramamurthy
Byrav Ramamurthy University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Mostafa H. Ammar
Mostafa H. Ammar Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your academic journey beyond Computer Science can open up a range of rewarding career pathways. Many online programs now make it possible to pursue related fields that are in high demand, while offering flexibility for working students and professionals.

For those passionate about sustainability and the environment, earning a cheapest online environmental science degree can lead to impactful roles in ecology, climate policy, or green technology. Alternatively, those drawn to design, innovation, and physical systems may consider an online mechanical engineering degree, which prepares graduates for careers in manufacturing, robotics, and product development.

If you are interested in foundational sciences, pursuing an online bachelor's degree in physics can open doors to research, education, and emerging fields like quantum computing. Additionally, as industries increasingly rely on data-driven decision-making, enrolling in an affordable data science degree can fast-track you into analytics, machine learning, or artificial intelligence careers.

Exploring these online degree options is a practical way to align your education with your interests and the evolving needs of the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Nader Mohamed

Trending Scientists