World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5511 5284 233 219 148 9256

Mark E. McMaster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. McMaster between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. McMaster published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 6 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. McMaster: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 1
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 9
2012 9
2013 11
2014 7
2015 8
2016 4
2017 7
2018 6
2019 8
2020 11
2021 9
2022 5
2023 2
2024 7
2025 5
2026 1
Total 164
Download as CSV

Mark E. McMaster publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. McMaster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 148
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark E. McMaster D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. McMaster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark E. McMaster is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada in Canada. Their research primarily falls within Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics of their work cover various aspects of aquatic and environmental health, including:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

McMaster has contributed to a number of journal articles, with recent papers published in prominent environmental and ecological venues. Selected publications include:

  • Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in the Canadian environment: A review of sampling techniques, strategies and instrumentation, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • Ecological effects and causal synthesis of oil sands activity impacts on river ecosystems: water synthesis review, 2021, Environmental Reviews
  • Endocrine Disruptor Impacts on Fish From Chile: The Influence of Wastewaters, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Development of a thin-film solid-phase microextraction (TF-SPME) method coupled to liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for high-throughput determination of steroid hormones in white sucker fish plasma, 2020, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
  • qPCR-based eDNA workflow for humic-rich lake sediments: Combined use of sedimentary DNA (sedDNA) and Indigenous Knowledge in reconstructing historical fish records, 2023, Ecological Indicators

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Erin Ussery
  • Joanne L. Parrott
  • Gerald R. Tetreault
  • Jessie Cunningham
  • Mark R. Servos

McMaster's research has appeared multiple times in several leading scientific journals, including:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Aquatic Toxicology

This profile demonstrates the scientist's involvement in multidimensional environmental research, addressing complex issues such as pollutant impacts on aquatic organisms, methodological advancements in environmental toxin measurement, and the integration of molecular techniques like environmental DNA with Indigenous Knowledge for biodiversity studies.

Best Publications

  • Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

    Alistair B. A. Boxall;Murray A. Rudd;Bryan W. Brooks;Daniel J. Caldwell

  • VITELLOGENIN : A BIOMARKER FOR ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS

    P.-D Hansen;H Dizer;B Hock;A Marx

  • Exposure to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent disrupts the pituitary-gonadal axis of white sucker at multiple sites

    G.J. Van Der Kraak;K.R. Munkittrick;M.E. McMaster;C.B. Portt

  • Changes in hepatic mixed-function oxygenase (MFO) activity, plasma steroid levels and age at maturity of a white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) population exposed to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent

    M.E. McMaster;G.J. Van Der Kraak;C.B. Portt;K.R. Munkittrick

  • Survey of receiving-water environmental impacts associated with discharges from pulp mills: 2. Gonad size, liver size, hepatic erod activity and plasma sex steroid levels in white sucker

    Kelly R. Munkittrick;Mark R. Servos;Glen J. Van Der Kraak;Mark E. McMaster

  • Intersex and reproductive impairment of wild fish exposed to multiple municipal wastewater discharges

    Gerald R. Tetreault;Gerald R. Tetreault;Charles J. Bennett;K. Shires;B. Knight

  • Changes in Maturity, Plasma Sex Steroid Levels, Hepatic Mixed-Function Oxygenase Activity, and the Presence of External Lesions in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) Exposed to Bleached Kraft Mill Effluent

    K. R. Munkittrick;M. E. McMaster;C. B. Portt;G. J. Van Der Kraak

  • Response of hepatic MFO activity and plasma sex steroids to secondary treatment of bleached kraft pulp mill effluent and mill shutdown

    K. R. M. Munkttrick;G. J. Van Der Kraak;M. E. McMaster;C. B. Portt

  • An overview of recent studies on the potential of pulp‐mill effluents to alter reproductive parameters in fish

    K.R. Munkittrick;M. E. McMaster;L.H. McCarthy;M. R. Servos

  • Altered reproduction in fish exposed to pulp and paper mill effluents: roles of individual compounds and mill operating conditions.

    L. Mark Hewitt;Tibor G. Kovacs;Monique G. Dubé;Deborah L. MacLatchy

  • Preliminary fingerprinting of Athabasca oil sands polar organics in environmental samples using electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry

    John V. Headley;Mark P. Barrow;Kerry M. Peru;Bradley D. Fahlman

  • Milt characteristics, reproductive performance, and larval survival and development of white sucker exposed to bleached kraft mill effluent.

    M.E. McMaster;C.B. Portt;K.R. Munkittrick;D.G. Dixon

  • Elevated ovarian follicular apoptosis and heat shock protein-70 expression in white sucker exposed to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent.

    D. M. Janz;M. E. Mcmaster;K. R. Munkittrick;G. Van Der Kraak

  • PROTOCOL FOR MEASURING IN VITRO STEROID PRODUCTION BY FISH GONADAL TISSUE

    M. E. McMaster;K. R. Munkittrick;J. J. Jardine;R. D. Robinson

  • Chemical fingerprinting of naphthenic acids and oil sands process waters—A review of analytical methods for environmental samples

    J. V. Headley;K. M. Peru;M. H. Mohamed;R. A. Frank

  • An Epidemiological Evaluation of the Biochemical Basis for Steroid Hormonal Depressions in Fish Exposed to Industrial Wastes

    Mark E. McMaster;Glen J. Van Der Kraak;Kelly R. Munkittrick

  • Overview of Freshwater Fish Studies from the Pulp and Paper Environmental Effects Monitoring Program

    Kelly R. Munkittrick;S. Anne McGeachy;Mark E. McMaster;Simon C. Courtenay

  • A decade of research on the environmental impacts of pulp and paper mill effluents in Canada: sources and characteristics of bioactive substances.

    L Mark Hewitt;Joanne L Parrott;Mark E McMaster

  • Potential endocrine disruption of sexual development in free ranging male northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) and green frogs (Rana clamitans) from areas of intensive row crop agriculture.

    Tana V. McDaniel;Pamela A. Martin;John Struger;Jim Sherry

  • Exposure to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent reduces the steroid biosynthetic capacity of white sucker ovarian follicles

    M.E. McMaster;G.J. Van Der Kraak;K.R. Munkittrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Kelly R. Munkittrick
Kelly R. Munkittrick University of New Brunswick
Mark R. Servos
Mark R. Servos University of Waterloo
Ricardo Barra
Ricardo Barra University of Concepción
Derek C. G. Muir
Derek C. G. Muir Environment and Climate Change Canada
Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
Scott E. Belanger
Scott E. Belanger Procter & Gamble (United States)
François Gagné
François Gagné Environment and Climate Change Canada
Mehran Alaee
Mehran Alaee Environment and Climate Change Canada
D. George Dixon
D. George Dixon University of Waterloo
Vance L. Trudeau
Vance L. Trudeau University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences in the USA opens doors to several related fields that offer promising career paths. For students seeking a flexible and cost-effective start, a budget friendly online general studies degree can provide a solid foundation while keeping expenses manageable.

For those interested in a quicker academic route, some programs are recognized as the easiest bachelor's degree options, blending accessibility with essential knowledge that supports environmental careers.

Those focused on Earth sciences should consider specialized fields like geology. Enrolling in one of the best online geology degree programs can enhance expertise and open opportunities in resource management, conservation, and research.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a vital role in environmental analysis and planning. Pursuing a top GIS masters programs equips students with critical skills to handle spatial data, a growing asset in many environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. McMaster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles