World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2804 2563 486 441 295 8765

Richard Coker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Coker between 1966 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Coker published across 55 years, from 1966 to 2020, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2012. 4 of the 345 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2012. 1966: 2 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications
1966 2020

345 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Coker: publications per year, 1966 to 2020
Year Publications
1966 2
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 14
1992 15
1993 12
1994 11
1995 17
1996 6
1997 12
1998 10
1999 3
2000 11
2001 12
2002 6
2003 10
2004 18
2005 11
2006 22
2007 12
2008 11
2009 8
2010 20
2011 8
2012 24
2013 16
2014 8
2015 8
2016 7
2017 22
2018 3
2019 1
2020 3
Total 345
Download as CSV

Richard Coker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Coker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 295 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 295
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Coker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Coker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard Coker is a researcher affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their work is situated within an academic environment known for public health and global health research.

There are no listed recent papers or publications attributed to Richard Coker in the provided data. Similarly, there is no detailed information on frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study associated with their work.

The absence of detailed records on research topics, publications, and awards suggests that the publicly available data on Richard Coker is limited or not fully indexed in the source consulted. As such, specific contributions to science, thematic research foci, or collaborative networks cannot be described at this time.

Best Publications

  • Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: regional challenges to control.

    Richard J Coker;Benjamin M Hunter;James W Rudge;Marco Liverani

  • Towards a conceptual framework to support one-health research for policy on emerging zoonoses

    Richard Coker;Jonathan Rushton;Sandra Mounier-Jack;Esron Karimuribo

  • Risk factors for pulmonary tuberculosis in Russia: case-control study.

    Richard Coker;Martin McKee;Rifat Atun;Boika Dimitrova

  • Liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil): An effective new treatment for Kaposi's sarcoma in AIDS

    N.D. James;N.D. James;R.J. Coker;D. Tomlinson;J.R.W. Harris

  • How prepared is Europe for pandemic influenza? Analysis of national plans

    Sandra Mounier-Jack;Richard J Coker

  • Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment in Human Influenza A(H5N1) Infections: Analysis of a Global Patient Registry

    Wiku Bakti Bawono Adisasmito;Paul K.S. Chan;Nelson Lee;Ahmet Faik Oner

  • Factors associated with the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination in adults: a systematic review.

    May P. S. Yeung;May P. S. Yeung;Frank Leung Yuk Lam;Richard Coker

  • Review: multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: public health challenges.

    Richard J. Coker

  • Late diagnosis of HIV in Europe: definitional and public health challenges.

    A. Adler;S. Mounier-Jack;R.J. Coker

  • Health systems, communicable diseases and integration

    Altynay Shigayeva;Rifat Atun;Martin McKee;Richard Coker

  • Health-care system frailties and public health control of communicable disease on the European Union's new eastern border.

    Richard J Coker;Rifat A Atun;Martin McKee

  • The effect of cigarette smoking on the development of AIDS in HIV-1-seropositive individuals.

    R. B. Nieman;J. Fleming;R. J. Coker;J. R. W. Harris

  • Treatment of cryptococcosis with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in 23 patients with AIDS.

    R. J. Coker;M. Viviani;B. G. Gazzard;B. Du Pont

  • Mapping infectious disease hospital surge threats to lessons learnt in Singapore: a systems analysis and development of a framework to inform how to DECIDE on planning and response strategies

    Shweta R Singh;Richard Coker;Hubertus J-M Vrijhoef;Yee Sin Leo

  • Health service providers' perceptions of barriers to tuberculosis care in Russia

    B Dimitrova;D Balabanova;R Atun;F Drobniewski

  • A framework and toolkit for capturing the communicable disease programmes within health systems: tuberculosis control as an illustrative example.

    R A Atun;N Lennox-Chhugani;Francis Drobniewski;Y A Samyshkin

  • Understanding and managing zoonotic risk in the new livestock industries

    Marco Liverani;Jeff Waage;Tony Barnett;Dirk U. Pfeiffer

  • Epidemiology and control of tuberculosis in Western European cities.

    AC Hayward;T Darton;JN Van-Tam;JM Watson

  • Compulsory screening of immigrants for tuberculosis and HIV

    Richard Coker

  • Cytomegalovirus infection in AIDS. Patterns of disease, response to therapy and trends in survival.

    B.S. Peters;E.J. Beck;S. Anderson;D. Coleman

  • Health in Southeast Asia 3 Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: regional challenges to control

    Richard J Coker;Benjamin M Hunter;James W Rudge;Marco Liverani

  • Pandemic influenza preparedness in the Asia-Pacific region: An analysis of selected national plans

    Sandra Mounier-Jack;Richard Coker

  • How prepared is Europe for pandemic influenza? Analysis of national plans. Commentary

    Kennedy F. Shortridge;Sandra Mounier-Jack;Richard J. Coker

Frequent Co-Authors

Rifat Atun
Rifat Atun Harvard University
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Francis Drobniewski
Francis Drobniewski Imperial College London
Jonathan Rushton
Jonathan Rushton University of Liverpool
Robert F. Miller
Robert F. Miller University College London
Gavin J. D. Smith
Gavin J. D. Smith Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Mark C. Poznansky
Mark C. Poznansky Harvard University
Nelson Lee
Nelson Lee University of Alberta
Dirk U. Pfeiffer
Dirk U. Pfeiffer City University of Hong Kong
Jonathan Weber
Jonathan Weber Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Social Sciences and Humanities grows, online learning is redefining education and career options. Students can now access online msw programs designed to suit a variety of schedules and budgets, including 1 year msw programs online for those seeking a fast-track to their social work careers.

For individuals interested in behavioral health, bcba certification programs offer a direct route to specialized roles in behavior analysis. Meanwhile, students focused on understanding human behavior can consider an online accelerated psychology degree, which can quickly lead to careers in counseling, research, or education.

Online degrees in these fields address the growing need for flexible study while preparing graduates for meaningful, people-centered careers. Whether you are beginning your journey or seeking advancement, these pathways offer practical routes to impact-driven professions.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Coker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles