World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
14704
World Ranking
9001
National Ranking
4769

Doug Rohrer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doug Rohrer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Doug Rohrer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doug Rohrer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Doug Rohrer is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a notable focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology as well as Developmental and Educational Psychology. The work also intersects with Education, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Science Applications.

Rohrer's research topics include:

  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Memory Processes and Influences

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rohrer include Marissa K. Hartwig, Robert F. Dedrick, William G. Emeny, and Christine R. Harris.

Academic contributions by Rohrer have appeared in various publication venues, including:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied
  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Psychological Inquiry

Notable papers authored or coauthored by Doug Rohrer include:

  • The Scarcity of Interleaved Practice in Mathematics Textbooks, 2020, Educational Psychology Review
  • Spaced mathematics practice improves test scores and reduces overconfidence, 2021, Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Scheduling math practice: Students' underappreciation of spacing and interleaving., 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied
  • Unanswered questions about spaced interleaved mathematics practice., 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • A Train Wreck by Any Other Name, 2021, Psychological Inquiry

Best Publications

  • Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence

    Harold Pashler;Mark McDaniel;Doug Rohrer;Robert Bjork

  • Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

    Nicholas J. Cepeda;Harold Pashler;Edward Vul;John T. Wixted

  • Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention

    Nicholas J. Cepeda;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Edward Vul;Edward Vul;Doug Rohrer;John T. Wixted

  • Using Spacing to Enhance Diverse Forms of Learning: Review of Recent Research and Implications for Instruction

    Shana K. Carpenter;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Doug Rohrer;Sean H. K. Kang

  • When Does Feedback Facilitate Learning of Words

    Harold Pashler;Nicholas J. Cepeda;John T. Wixted;Doug Rohrer

  • The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning

    Doug Rohrer;Kelli M Taylor

  • Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences

    Harold Pashler;Doug Rohrer;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Shana K. Carpenter

  • The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge

    Doug Rohrer;Kelli M Taylor

  • Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications.

    Nicholas J Cepeda;Noriko Coburn;Doug Rohrer;John T Wixted

  • Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies

    Doug Rohrer;Harold Pashler

  • The effects of interleaved practice

    Kelli Taylor;Doug Rohrer

  • Learning styles: where's the evidence?

    Doug Rohrer;Harold Pashler

  • Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts

    Doug Rohrer

  • Tests Enhance the Transfer of Learning.

    Doug Rohrer;Kelli M Taylor;Brandon Sholar

  • Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.

    John T. Wixted;Doug Rohrer

  • Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning.

    Doug Rohrer;Robert F. Dedrick;Sandra Stershic

  • Increasing Retention Without Increasing Study Time

    Doug Rohrer;Harold Pashler

  • An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall.

    Doug Rohrer;John T. Wixted

  • Two Failures to Replicate High-Performance-Goal Priming Effects

    Christine R. Harris;Noriko Coburn;Doug Rohrer;Harold Pashler

  • The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems

    Doug Rohrer;Robert F. Dedrick;Kaleena Burgess

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Christine R. Harris
Christine R. Harris University of California, San Diego
Michael C. Mozer
Michael C. Mozer Google (United States)
Shana K. Carpenter
Shana K. Carpenter Oregon State University
Edward Vul
Edward Vul University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Robert A. Bjork
Robert A. Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
Nelson Butters
Nelson Butters University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Psychology in the USA, it’s important to explore the diverse online degree options and career pathways available. Many students opt for accredited online programs, which can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare, education, and community services.

If you are interested in applied behavior analysis, you might want to learn more about how to become a bcba in Washington DC, or specific requirements for becoming a bcba in Wichita. These pathways often require a master’s degree in psychology or a related field, plus supervised experience and state or national certification.

Location-specific differences may affect the process, as seen in steps for how to become a bcba in Winston Salem. Alternatively, counseling offers another fulfilling option—discover the requirements for how to become a mental health counselor in Albuquerque. Each role has unique licensure, education, and practical experience needs.

Best Scientists Citing Doug Rohrer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles