World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
E. Sander Connolly

E. Sander Connolly

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 117 4163 3900 2282 2113 783 59714

E. Sander Connolly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Sander Connolly between 1965 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Sander Connolly published across 61 years, from 1965 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2009. 29 of the 821 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2009. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 40 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 43 publications 2009: 55 publications 2010: 46 publications 2011: 52 publications 2012: 48 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 11 publications
1965 2025

821 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Sander Connolly: publications per year, 1965 to 2025
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 7
1997 14
1998 15
1999 12
2000 13
2001 16
2002 19
2003 19
2004 23
2005 36
2006 40
2007 24
2008 43
2009 55
2010 46
2011 52
2012 48
2013 34
2014 47
2015 37
2016 29
2017 23
2018 21
2019 37
2020 26
2021 14
2022 8
2023 19
2024 18
2025 11
Total 821
Download as CSV

E. Sander Connolly publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Sander Connolly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 783 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 783
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Sander Connolly D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Sander Connolly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 117
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. Sander Connolly is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in fields related to neurology and cerebrovascular diseases.

Their research output includes notable papers such as:

  • Single-Cell Genomics Reveals a Novel Cell State During Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Switching and Potential Therapeutic Targets for Atherosclerosis in Mouse and Human, 2020, Circulation
  • Complement C3 vs C5 inhibition in severe COVID-19: Early clinical findings reveal differential biological efficacy, 2020, Clinical Immunology
  • Ketamine to treat super-refractory status epilepticus, 2020, Neurology
  • Cognitive-motor dissociation and time to functional recovery in patients with acute brain injury in the USA: a prospective observational cohort study, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Atherosclerosis Is a Smooth Muscle Cell-Driven Tumor-Like Disease, 2024, Circulation

Frequent co-authors in Connolly's publications include:

  • David Roh
  • Jan Claassen
  • Soojin Park
  • Sachin Agarwal
  • Shivani Ghoshal

Connolly's work is regularly published in prominent venues such as:

  • Stroke
  • Neurocritical Care
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of neurosurgery

The primary field of study is Medicine, with a dominant focus on Neurology. Other significant subfields include Epidemiology, Immunology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Main research topics encompass:

  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    E. Sander Connolly;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;Colin P. Derdeyn

  • Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American heart association

    Joshua B. Bederson;E. Sander Connolly;Henry H Batjer;Ralph G. Dacey

  • Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Lewis B. Morgenstern;J. Claude Hemphill;Craig Anderson;Kyra Becker

  • Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

    Michael N. Diringer;Thomas P. Bleck;J. Claude Hemphill;David Menon

  • Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    B. Gregory Thompson;Robert D. Brown;Sepideh Amin-Hanjani;Joseph P. Broderick

  • Effect of Cisternal and Ventricular Blood on Risk of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Fisher Scale Revisited

    Jan Claassen;Gary L. Bernardini;Kurt Kreiter;Joseph Bates

  • Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature.

    Alan P. Lozier;Robert R. Sciacca;Mario F. Romagnoli;E. Sander Connolly

  • Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation

    C. Stapf;H. Mast;R. R. Sciacca;J. H. Choi

  • Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified fisher scale.

    Jennifer A. Frontera;Jan Claassen;J. Michael Schmidt;Katja E. Wartenberg

  • Cerebral protection in homozygous null ICAM-1 mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Role of neutrophil adhesion in the pathogenesis of stroke.

    E. S. Connolly;C. J. Winfree;T. A. Springer;Y. Naka

  • ER-X: a novel, plasma membrane-associated, putative estrogen receptor that is regulated during development and after ischemic brain injury.

    C. Dominique Toran-Allerand;Xiaoping Guan;Neil J. MacLusky;Tamas L. Horvath

  • Impact of medical complications on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage

    Katja E. Wartenberg;J. Michael Schmidt;Jan Claassen;Richard E. Temes

  • Defining vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is the most clinically relevant definition?

    Jennifer A. Frontera;Andres Fernandez;J. Michael Schmidt;Jan Claassen

  • Global Cerebral Edema After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Frequency, Predictors, and Impact on Outcome

    Jan Claassen;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;Kurt T. Kreiter;Evelyn Y. Du

  • Electrographic seizures and periodic discharges after intracerebral hemorrhage.

    J. Claassen;N. Jetté;F. Chum;R. Green

  • Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring

    Geoff Appelboom;Elvis Camacho;Mickey E. Abraham;Samuel S. Bruce

  • The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma

    Andrew F. Ducruet;Bartosz T. Grobelny;Brad E. Zacharia;Zachary L. Hickman

  • Impact of tight glycemic control on cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury : A microdialysis study

    Mauro Oddo;J Michael Schmidt;Emmanuel Carrera;Neeraj Badjatia

  • National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Preventing Alzheimer Disease and Cognitive Decline

    Martha L. Daviglus;Carl C. Bell;Wade Berrettini;Phyllis E. Bowen

  • Predictors and impact of aneurysm rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Andrew M. Naidech;Nazli Janjua;Kurt T. Kreiter;Noeleen D. Ostapkovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan A. Mayer
Stephan A. Mayer New York Medical College
Jan Claassen
Jan Claassen Columbia University
Robert M. Starke
Robert M. Starke University of Miami
Robert A. Solomon
Robert A. Solomon Columbia University
David J. Pinsky
David J. Pinsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert R. Sciacca
Robert R. Sciacca Columbia University
Soo-Jin Park
Soo-Jin Park Inha University
Mitchell S.V. Elkind
Mitchell S.V. Elkind Columbia University
Joseph P. Broderick
Joseph P. Broderick University of Cincinnati
Robert D. Brown
Robert D. Brown Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean a traditional medical degree. Many healthcare professionals choose flexible online programs to advance their qualifications and career options. For registered nurses seeking advancement, you can find convenient rn to bsn online without clinicals programs. These options allow working professionals to earn their bachelor’s credential without additional in-person requirements.

Nurses looking for the highest clinical leadership roles may consider earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). If speed matters, the shortest dnp programs online offer an accelerated path. Some students may prefer programs recognized as the easiest online dnp programs to efficiently balance studies with work or family commitments.

For those aiming to launch a medical career quickly, the fast track medical lpn pathways allow you to start working in healthcare in a relatively short time. Exploring these related online degrees can help you identify the best route to fit your professional goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing E. Sander Connolly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles