World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
10764
World Ranking
5419
National Ranking
259

Pauline Aalten publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pauline Aalten sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Pauline Aalten D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pauline Aalten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pauline Aalten is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research encompasses fields primarily within Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions in psychiatry and mental health, neurology, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and education.

Their work prominently focuses on topics related to dementia and cognitive impairment research, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, innovative teaching and learning methods, educational strategies and epistemologies, evaluation of teaching practices, brain tumor detection and classification, and the application of machine learning in healthcare.

Notable recent publications by Pauline Aalten include:

  • "Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education-A mixed-methods study," 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "The Association Between Biomarkers and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Across the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum," 2020, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • "Prevention and treatment of mental health and psychosocial problems in college students: An umbrella review of meta-analyses," 2021, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "The Associations of Common Psychological Problems With Mental Disorders Among College Students," 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors working alongside Pauline Aalten include Jurgen A.H.R. Claassen, Seán Kennelly, Esther E. Bron, Peter Paul De Deyn, and Huub A. M. Middelkoop. Collaborative efforts span multiple publications and underline interdisciplinary research intersections.

Pauline Aalten's scholarship has been published in various specialized venues such as:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Their research approach integrates advanced methodologies including machine learning techniques relevant to healthcare diagnostics and treatments, particularly focused on Alzheimer's disease and cognitive impairments. In educational contexts, studies emphasize the development and evaluation of learning strategies, reflecting interdisciplinary applications of psychological and medical knowledge.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Philippe Robert;C. U. Onyike;A. F. G. Leentjens;K. Dujardin

  • Neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia: Results from the European Alzheimer disease Consortium: Part I

    Pauline Aalten;Frans R.J. Verhey;Marina Boziki;Roger Bullock

  • Automatic speech analysis for the assessment of patients with predementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Alexandra König;Alexandra König;Aharon Satt;Alexander Sorin;Ron Hoory

  • Behavioral Problems in Dementia: A Factor Analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    Pauline Aalten;Marjolein E. de Vugt;Richel Lousberg;Edith Korten

  • The course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. Part I: findings from the two-year longitudinal Maasbed study.

    Pauline Aalten;Marjolein E. de Vugt;Niek Jaspers;Jellemer Jolles

  • Impact of behavioural problems on spousal caregivers: a comparison between Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

    Marjolein E. de Vugt;Samantha R. Riedijk;Pauline Aalten;Aad Tibben

  • Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group.

    Philippe Robert;Krista L Lanctôt;Luis Agüera-Ortiz;Pauline Aalten

  • Do caregiver management strategies influence patient behaviour in dementia

    Marjolein E. de Vugt;Fred Stevens;Pauline Aalten;Richel Lousberg

  • A prospective study of the effects of behavioral symptoms on the institutionalization of patients with dementia.

    Marjolein E. de Vugt;Fred Stevens;Pauline Aalten;Richel Lousberg

  • Consistency of neuropsychiatric syndromes across dementias: results from the European Alzheimer Disease Consortium. Part II.

    Pauline Aalten;Frans R. J. Verhey;Marina Boziki;Andrea Brugnolo

  • Behavioural disturbances in dementia patients and quality of the marital relationship.

    Marjolein E. de Vugt;Fred Stevens;Pauline Aalten;Richel Lousberg

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease: A magnetic resonance imaging study using voxel‐based morphometry

    Jennifer S.A.M. Reijnders;Bart Scholtissen;Wim E.J. Weber;Pauline Aalten

  • Impact of molecular imaging on the diagnostic process in a memory clinic

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Niels D. Prins;Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg;Afina W. Lemstra

  • Atrophy in the parahippocampal gyrus as an early biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease

    C Echávarri;P Aalten;Harry B M Uylings;Harry B M Uylings;H I L Jacobs

  • Awareness in dementia: a review of clinical correlates.

    Pauline Aalten;Evelien van Valen;Linda Clare;Geraldine Kenny

  • New MRI Markers for Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and a Comparison with Medial Temporal Lobe Measurements

    Lies Clerx;Pieter Jelle Visser;Frans Verhey;Pauline Aalten

  • Fostering Effective Learning Strategies in Higher Education – A Mixed-Methods Study

    Felicitas Biwer;Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink;Pauline Aalten;Anique B.H. de Bruin

  • Behavioral problems in dementia patients and salivary cortisol patterns in caregivers.

    Marjolein E. de Vugt;Nancy A. Nicolson;Pauline Aalten;Richel Lousberg

  • Association of Cerebral Amyloid-β Aggregation With Cognitive Functioning in Persons Without Dementia.

    Willemijn J Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Betty M Tijms;Anne M Fagan

  • Anxiety is related to Alzheimer cerebrospinal fluid markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment

    I.H.G.B. Ramakers;F.R.J. Verhey;P. Scheltens;H. Hampel

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Wiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert
Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert Radboud University
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Marjolein E. de Vugt
Marjolein E. de Vugt Maastricht University
Magda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Hilkka Soininen
Hilkka Soininen University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and career options, especially in counseling and therapy. One of the most popular career paths is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). The process and requirements to become an MFT can vary by region. For example, those interested in mft requirements in Corpus Christi should expect specific state licensing and education guidelines.

If you are researching how to become an mft in Dallas, you'll find that accredited degrees and supervised clinical hours are essential steps. Each location, such as Denver, presents its own rules; learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Denver involves understanding Colorado’s certification process.

Similarly, if Detroit is your goal, you can discover how to become a marriage and family therapist in Detroit by reviewing Michigan’s unique requirements. Exploring these pathways helps tailor your psychology studies and professional goals to the area where you wish to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Pauline Aalten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles