World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 6939 6668 2470 2296 125 11811

Toby R. Ault publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Toby R. Ault between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Toby R. Ault published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 7 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
2005 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Toby R. Ault: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 5
2011 8
2012 8
2013 12
2014 6
2015 8
2016 9
2017 8
2018 15
2019 7
2020 15
2021 4
2022 14
2023 5
2024 5
2025 2
Total 137
Download as CSV

Toby R. Ault publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toby R. Ault sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 125
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Toby R. Ault D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toby R. Ault sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Toby R. Ault is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States, working primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research contributions are distributed across multiple subfields, notably Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology, among others.

Their work has appeared frequently in several academic journals, including major publication venues such as Science, Journal of Climate, Geophysical Research Letters, Nature Climate Change, and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. The concentration of publications in these journals indicates a focus on topics related to climate and environmental systems.

Among the central topics covered by Ault's research are:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Xiaolu Li, Carlos M. Carrillo, Dimitris A. Herrera, Colin P. Evans, and Flavio Lehner.

Selected recent publications illustrating the scientist's research focus include:

  • "Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "On the essentials of drought in a changing climate," 2020, Science
  • "Megadroughts in the Common Era and the Anthropocene," 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "No consistent ENSO response to volcanic forcing over the last millennium," 2020, Science
  • "Soil Moisture Conditions Determine Land-Atmosphere Coupling and Drought Risk in the Northeastern United States," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Best Publications

  • Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains

    Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Toby R. Ault;Jason E. Smerdon

  • The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Revisited

    Matthew Newman;Matthew Newman;Michael A. Alexander;Toby R. Ault;Kim M. Cobb

  • Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change

    E. M. Wolkovich;B. I. Cook;B. I. Cook;J. M. Allen;T. M. Crimmins

  • Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects

    Clara Deser;Flavio Lehner;Keith B. Rodgers;Toby R. Ault

  • The Historical Impact of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Global Agricultural Productivity

    Ariel Ortiz-Bobea;Toby R. Ault;Carlos M. Carrillo;Robert G. Chambers

  • Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth

    Ariel Ortiz-Bobea;Toby R. Ault;Carlos M. Carrillo;Robert G. Chambers

  • On the essentials of drought in a changing climate

    Toby R. Ault

  • Assessing the Risk of Persistent Drought Using Climate Model Simulations and Paleoclimate Data

    Toby R. Ault;Julia E. Cole;Jonathan T. Overpeck;Gregory T. Pederson

  • Mid-latitude net precipitation decreased with Arctic warming during the Holocene.

    Cody C. Routson;Nicholas P. McKay;Darrell S. Kaufman;Michael P. Erb

  • Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology

    T. Jonathan Davies;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;Nathan J. B. Kraft;Nicolas Salamin;Nicolas Salamin

  • Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest.

    Toby R. Ault;Justin S. Mankin;Benjamin I. Cook;Jason E. Smerdon

  • Unpacking the climatic drivers of US agricultural yields

    Ariel Ortiz-Bobea;Haoying Wang;Carlos M Carrillo;Toby R Ault

  • Megadroughts in the Common Era and the Anthropocene

    Unknown

  • Climatic Controls on the Snowmelt Hydrology of the Northern Rocky Mountains

    Gregory T. Pederson;Gregory T. Pederson;Stephen T. Gray;Toby Ault;Wendy Marsh

  • Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era

    Jason E. Smerdon;Jurg Luterbacher;Steven J. Phipps;Kevin J. Anchukaitis

  • Sensitivity of Spring Phenology to Warming Across Temporal and Spatial Climate Gradients in Two Independent Databases

    Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;T. Jonathan Davies;Toby R. Ault

  • Spring onset variations and trends in the continental United States: past and regional assessment using temperature‐based indices

    Mark D. Schwartz;Toby R. Ault;Julio L. Betancourt

  • The Continuum of Hydroclimate Variability in Western North America during the Last Millennium

    Toby R. Ault;Julia E. Cole;Jonathan T. Overpeck;Gregory T. Pederson

  • Comparison of observed and simulated tropical climate trends using a forward model of coral δ18O

    D. M. Thompson;T. R. Ault;M. N. Evans;M. N. Evans;J. E. Cole

  • No consistent ENSO response to volcanic forcing over the last millennium

    Sylvia G. Dee;Kim M. Cobb;Julien Emile-Geay;Toby R. Ault

  • The imprint of climate within Northern Hemisphere trees

    Scott St. George;Toby R. Ault

  • Relative outcomes of climate change mitigation related to global temperature versus sea-level rise

    Gerald A Meehl;Aixue Hu;Claudia Tebaldi;Julie Michelle Arblaster;Julie Michelle Arblaster

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia E. Cole
Julia E. Cole University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Benjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Mark D. Schwartz
Mark D. Schwartz University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Julien Emile-Geay
Julien Emile-Geay University of Southern California
Julio L. Betancourt
Julio L. Betancourt United States Geological Survey
Jason E. Smerdon
Jason E. Smerdon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Justin S. Mankin
Justin S. Mankin Dartmouth College
Jonathan T. Overpeck
Jonathan T. Overpeck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Fasullo
John T. Fasullo National Center for Atmospheric Research
Clara Deser
Clara Deser National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields through online education. For those interested in advancing academic expertise, exploring eds to edd programs can provide valuable insights into educational leadership and policy development, which are vital in environmental advocacy and administration.

Social work intersects with environmental sciences in community health and sustainability initiatives. Affordable options like dsw online programs allow professionals to elevate their impact by addressing social determinants linked to environmental factors.

For students seeking flexibility, enrolling in an online general studies degree affordable program offers a well-rounded curriculum that can be tailored to align with environmental interests while accommodating varied schedules and learning styles.

Additionally, exploring the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get options can help students identify accessible pathways to start their academic journey in fields related to environmental sciences, especially for those balancing education with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Toby R. Ault

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles