World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
15413
World Ranking
5939
National Ranking
2148

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
44
Citations
15216
World Ranking
19196
National Ranking
7838

Mark D. Schwartz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark D. Schwartz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Schwartz is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. The core of their research lies within Environmental Science, contributing to 45 publications in this field.

Their work encompasses several vital subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. The diversity of subfields highlights a broad engagement with both ecological and biological systems.

Mark D. Schwartz's research addresses specific topics such as Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Forest Ecology and Management, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, and Plant and Animal Studies. These topics collectively form a comprehensive perspective on environmental interactions and ecosystem dynamics.

Notable recent publications by Mark D. Schwartz include:

  • Connecting Land-Atmosphere Interactions to Surface Heterogeneity in CHEESEHEAD19, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Evaluating autumn phenology derived from field observations, satellite data, and carbon flux measurements in a northern mixed forest, USA, 2020, International Journal of Biometeorology
  • How well do the spring indices predict phenological activity across plant species?, 2020, International Journal of Biometeorology
  • Ten best practices for effective phenological research, 2023, International Journal of Biometeorology
  • Diverging Northern Hemisphere Trends in Meteorological Versus Ecological Indicators of Spring Onset in CMIP6, 2023, Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark D. Schwartz include Theresa M. Crimmins, Ankur R. Desai, Amanda S. Gallinat, Alison Donnelly, and Xiaolu Li.

The most common venues publishing Mark D. Schwartz's work are the International Journal of Biometeorology, Diabetes, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Geophysical Research Letters. This range of journals illustrates an engagement with both ecological and broader biological sciences.

Best Publications

  • Shifting plant phenology in response to global change

    Elsa E. Cleland;Isabelle Chuine;Annette Menzel;Harold A. Mooney

  • Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere

    Mark D. Schwartz;Rein Ahas;Anto Aasa

  • Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982-2006

    Michael A. White;Kirsten M. de Beurs;Kamel Didan;David W. Inouye

  • Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change

    E. M. Wolkovich;B. I. Cook;B. I. Cook;J. M. Allen;T. M. Crimmins

  • Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast

    Katharine Hayhoe;Cameron P Wake;Thomas G Huntington;Lifeng Luo

  • Phenology : an integrative environmental science

    Mark Donald Schwartz

  • Changes in North American spring

    Mark D. Schwartz;Bernhard E. Reiter

  • Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA

    David W. Wolfe;Mark D. Schwartz;Alan N. Lakso;Yuka Otsuki

  • Green-wave phenology

    Mark D. Schwartz

  • Assessing satellite-derived start-of-season measures in the conterminous USA

    Mark D. Schwartz;Bradley C. Reed;Michael A. White

  • Advancing to full bloom: planning phenological research for the 21st century

    M. D. Schwartz

  • Validating satellite phenology through intensive ground observation and landscape scaling in a mixed seasonal forest

    Liang Liang;Mark D. Schwartz;Songlin Fei

  • Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology

    T. Jonathan Davies;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;Nathan J. B. Kraft;Nicolas Salamin;Nicolas Salamin

  • Temperature and snowfall trigger alpine vegetation green-up on the world's roof

    Xiaoqiu Chen;Shuai An;David W. Inouye;Mark D. Schwartz

  • Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications

    Ellen G. Denny;Katharine L. Gerst;Abraham J. Miller-Rushing;Geraldine L. Tierney

  • Surface phenology and satellite sensor-derived onset of greenness: an initial comparison

    Mark D. Schwartz;Bradley C. Reed

  • Phenology of temperate trees in tropical climates

    Rolf Borchert;Kevin Robertson;Mark D. Schwartz;Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • From Caprio's lilacs to the USA National Phenology Network

    Mark D Schwartz;Julio L Betancourt;Jake F Weltzin

  • Determining the growing season of land vegetation on the basis of plant phenology and satellite data in Northern China.

    Xiaoqiu Chen;Zhongjun Tan;Mark D. Schwartz;Chengxin Xu

  • Sensitivity of Spring Phenology to Warming Across Temporal and Spatial Climate Gradients in Two Independent Databases

    Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;T. Jonathan Davies;Toby R. Ault

  • Monitoring global change with phenology: The case of the spring green wave

    Mark D. Schwartz

  • Landscape phenology: an integrative approach to seasonal vegetation dynamics

    Liang Liang;Mark D. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Toby R. Ault
Toby R. Ault Cornell University
Julio L. Betancourt
Julio L. Betancourt United States Geological Survey
Benjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Gregory J. McCabe
Gregory J. McCabe United States Geological Survey
Jake F. Weltzin
Jake F. Weltzin United States Geological Survey
Susan J. Mazer
Susan J. Mazer University of California, Santa Barbara
Nicolas Salamin
Nicolas Salamin University of Lausanne
Elizabeth M. Wolkovich
Elizabeth M. Wolkovich University of British Columbia
Camille Parmesan
Camille Parmesan The University of Texas at Austin
Elsa E. Cleland
Elsa E. Cleland University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and interdisciplinary studies. For students interested in earth processes and natural resources, pursuing the best online geology degree programs offers a deep dive into geoscience principles and practical fieldwork skills.

Geospatial technology plays a critical role in environmental research and planning. Degrees specializing in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide expertise in mapping and spatial data analysis. Exploring the best gis schools can give students access to cutting-edge tools essential for environmental monitoring and management.

For those looking to impact environmental policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is a valuable credential. Accelerated programs like the one year mpa combine leadership and organizational skills necessary for effective governance in sustainability-focused agencies.

Environmental issues are deeply connected to social factors. Obtaining a degree in sociology helps students understand societal dynamics and human behaviors affecting the environment. Prospective learners can find flexible options among the best online sociology bachelor degree programs tailored to modern educational needs.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Schwartz

Trending Scientists