World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6145 5711 3343 3031 154 9649

Jonathan W. Kanter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan W. Kanter between 1998 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan W. Kanter published across 27 years, from 1998 to 2024, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2009. 5 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2009. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications
1998 2024

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan W. Kanter: publications per year, 1998 to 2024
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 9
2009 18
2010 12
2011 9
2012 12
2013 6
2014 6
2015 11
2016 10
2017 15
2018 8
2019 5
2020 11
2021 5
2022 1
2023 3
2024 2
Total 162
Download as CSV

Jonathan W. Kanter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Kanter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan W. Kanter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Kanter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan W. Kanter is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their scholarly work spans a range of subfields including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their research topics cover multiple areas such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, racial and ethnic identity research, attachment and relationship dynamics, COVID-19 and mental health, mental health research topics, and behavioral and psychological studies.

Jonathan W. Kanter has published several papers in various academic venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • Addressing microaggressions in racially charged patient-provider interactions: a pilot randomized trial (2020, BMC Medical Education)
  • An integrative contextual behavioral model of intimate relations (2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science)

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Adam M. Kuczynski
  • Katherine E. Manbeck
  • Mariah D. Corey
  • Monnica T. Williams
  • Daniel W. M. Maitland

Their research has appeared regularly in publication venues such as:

  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Race and Social Problems
  • BMC Medical Education
  • BMC Psychology

Jonathan W. Kanter has also contributed to book publications with titles including La práctica de la psicoterapia analítico-funcional published by ABA España eBooks in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder and Drug-Dependence

    Marsha M. Linehan;Henry Schmidt;Linda A. Dimeff;J. Christopher Craft

  • What is behavioral activation? A review of the empirical literature.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Rachel C. Manos;William M. Bowe;David E. Baruch

  • The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Patrick S. Mulick;Andrew M. Busch;Kristoffer S. Berlin

  • The behavioral activation for depression scale-short form: development and validation.

    Rachel C. Manos;Jonathan W. Kanter;Wen Luo

  • A critical review of assessment strategies to measure the behavioral activation model of depression

    Rachel C. Manos;Jonathan W. Kanter;Andrew M. Busch;Andrew M. Busch

  • The nature of clinical depression: Symptoms, syndromes, and behavior analysis

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Andrew M. Busch;Cristal E. Weeks;Sara J. Landes

  • A Guide to Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: Awareness, Courage, Love, and Behaviorism

    Mavis Tsai;Robert J. Kohlenberg;Jonathan W. Kanter;Barbara Kohlenberg

  • Enhancing cognitive therapy for depression with functional analytic psychotherapy: Treatment guidelines and empirical findings

    Robert J. Kohlenberg;Jonathan W. Kanter;Madelon Y. Bolling;Chauncey R. Parker

  • Behavioral Activation: Distinctive Features

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Andrew M. Busch;Laura C. Rusch

  • Depression self-stigma: a new measure and preliminary findings.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Laura C. Rusch;Michael J. Brondino

  • Toward a Comprehensive Functional Analysis of Depressive Behavior: Five Environmental Factors and a Possible Sixth and Seventh

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Joseph D. Cautilli;Andrew M. Busch;David E. Baruch

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Behavioral Activation for the Treatment of Depression: Description and Comparison.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;David E. Baruch;Scott T. Gaynor

  • Validation of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) in a Community Sample with Elevated Depressive Symptoms

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Laura C. Rusch;Andrew M. Busch;Sonya K. Sedivy

  • Sudden Gains and Outcome: A Broader Temporal Analysis of Cognitive Therapy for Depression

    Andrew M. Busch;Jonathan W. Kanter;Sara J. Landes;Robert J. Kohlenberg

  • A Micro-Process Analysis of Functional Analytic Psychotherapy's Mechanism of Change

    Andrew M. Busch;Jonathan W. Kanter;Glenn M. Callaghan;David E. Baruch

  • The effect of contingent reinforcement on target variables in outpatient psychotherapy for depression: a successful and unsuccessful case using functional analytic psychotherapy.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Sara J. Landes;Andrew M. Busch;Laura C. Rusch

  • Initial Outcomes of a Culturally Adapted Behavioral Activation for Latinas Diagnosed with Depression at a Community Clinic.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Azara L. Santiago-Rivera;Laura C. Rusch;Andrew M. Busch

  • Behavioural activation: history, evidence and promise.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Ajeng J. Puspitasari;Maria M. Santos;Gabriela A. Nagy

  • A Randomized Hybrid Efficacy and Effectiveness Trial of Behavioral Activation for Latinos With Depression

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Azara L. Santiago-Rivera;María M. Santos;Gabriela Nagy

  • Behavior analytic conceptualization and treatment of depression: Traditional models and recent advances.

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Glenn M. Callaghan;Sara J. Landes;Andrew M. Busch

  • Behavioral Activation for Depression

    Jonathan W. Kanter;William M. Bowe;David E. Baruch;Andrew M. Busch

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Kohlenberg
Robert J. Kohlenberg University of Washington
Monnica T. Williams
Monnica T. Williams University of Ottawa
Lisa Ekselius
Lisa Ekselius Uppsala University
Bryan Roche
Bryan Roche National University of Ireland, Maynooth
William C. Follette
William C. Follette University of Nevada Reno
Robert W. Levenson
Robert W. Levenson University of California, Berkeley
Emily A. Butler
Emily A. Butler University of Arizona
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Simon Dymond
Simon Dymond Swansea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths in mental health, education, research, and more. Students interested in online study may also look at options in related fields through a comprehensive list of social science courses. These courses can deepen your understanding of human behavior and society.

It's important to distinguish between allied careers. For example, reviewing psychologist vs sociologist reveals key differences in focus and practice. Psychologists typically emphasize mental processes and treatments, while sociologists analyze group behaviors and societal trends.

If you’re drawn to counseling specifically, there are excellent online and campus-based counseling programs across the country. Students in the Mid-Atlantic region may want to investigate the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore. Those in New England can explore Boston counseling degree programs for high-quality education and training.

By considering a range of online degrees and specializations, students can find a pathway that aligns with their career goals in psychology, counseling, and the broader social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan W. Kanter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles