World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 90 958 836 605 517 301 28515
Medicine 88 13253 12476 6750 6244 285 25867

Ivan W. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ivan W. Miller between 1958 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ivan W. Miller published across 64 years, from 1958 to 2021, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 17 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications
1958 2021

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ivan W. Miller: publications per year, 1958 to 2021
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 5
1986 8
1987 4
1988 3
1989 5
1990 9
1991 3
1992 4
1993 2
1994 1
1995 6
1996 5
1997 5
1998 5
1999 2
2000 6
2001 5
2002 5
2003 7
2004 10
2005 14
2006 11
2007 11
2008 15
2009 10
2010 15
2011 12
2012 10
2013 13
2014 11
2015 12
2016 14
2017 14
2018 6
2019 7
2020 10
2021 7
Total 302
Download as CSV

Ivan W. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 301
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ivan W. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 90
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ivan W. Miller is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specific concentration in Neurology. This includes detailed work in neurosurgical procedures and complications, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, as well as traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

The scientist has contributed to the publication of papers in notable venues, particularly in the journal Neurosurgery. Their recent work includes a paper titled A Comparison of Initial GCS and Frailty for Predicting Outcomes Following Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage, published in 2020 in Neurosurgery.

  • Matthew H. McIntyre
  • Cameron Rawanduzy
  • Adil Afridi
  • Jesse Honig
  • Mohamed Halabi

These individuals frequently collaborate with Ivan W. Miller across their research efforts. The scientist's principal topics of investigation are closely aligned with clinical and surgical challenges in neurology, especially those related to hemorrhagic conditions and postoperative outcomes.

  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The focus on these topics is reflected in their publication record and ongoing academic inquiries. Their work contributes to advancing understanding of how clinical scores such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) relate to patient outcomes in chronic subdural hemorrhage scenarios, situating their scholarship within both clinical and surgical neurology domains.

Best Publications

  • THE McMASTER FAMILY ASSESSMENT DEVICE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY*

    Ivan W. Miller;Nathan B. Epstein;Duane S. Bishop;Gabor I. Keitner

  • The McMaster Approach to Families: theory, assessment, treatment and research

    Ivan W. Miller;Christine E. Ryan;Gabor I. Keitner;Duane S. Bishop

  • A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples.

    Robert I. Kabacoff;Ivan W. Miller;Duane S. Bishop;Nathan B. Epstein

  • The modified Hamilton rating scale for depression: Reliability and validity

    Ivan W. Miller;Stephen B. Bishop;William H. Norman;Heather Maddever

  • Reliability and validity of a smoking timeline follow-back interview.

    Richard A. Brown;Ellen S. Burgess;Suzanne D. Sales;Jessica A. Whiteley;Jessica A. Whiteley

  • The McMaster model: A view of healthy family functioning.

    Nathan B. Epstein;Christine E. Ryan;Duane S. Bishop;Ivan W. Miller

  • Family functioning and major depression: an overview

    Gabor I. Keitner;Ivan W. Miller

  • Postpartum Depression in Women Receiving Public Assistance: Pilot Study of an Interpersonal-Therapy-Oriented Group Intervention

    Caron Zlotnick;Sheri L. Johnson;Ivan W. Miller;Teri Pearlstein

  • Therapeutic alliance in depression treatment: controlling for prior change and patient characteristics.

    Daniel N. Klein;Joseph E. Schwartz;Neil J. Santiago;Dina Vivian

  • Multicenter Pilot Treatment Trial for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    W. Curt LaFrance;W. Curt LaFrance;Grayson L. Baird;Grayson L. Baird;Grayson L. Baird;John J. Barry;Andrew S. Blum

  • The Treatment of Chronic Depression, Part 3: Psychosocial Functioning Before and After Treatment With Sertraline or Imipramine

    I W Miller;G I Keitner;A F Schatzberg;D N Klein

  • Hatha yoga for depression: critical review of the evidence for efficacy, plausible mechanisms of action, and directions for future research.

    Lisa A Uebelacker;Gary Epstein-Lubow;Brandon A Gaudiano;Geoffrey Tremont

  • Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study

    Ivan W. Miller;Carlos A. Camargo;Sarah A. Arias;Ashley F. Sullivan

  • Learned helplessness in humans: A review and attribution-theory model.

    Ivan W. Miller;William H. Norman

  • Evaluating and Treating Families: The McMaster Approach

    Christine E. Ryan;Nathan B. Epstein;Gabor I. Keitner;Ivan W. Miller

  • Increases in manic symptoms after life events involving goal attainment.

    Sheri L. Johnson;David Sandrow;Björn Meyer;Ray Winters

  • Life events and suicidal ideation and behavior: A systematic review

    Richard T. Liu;Ivan W. Miller

  • The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation: reliability and validity

    Ivan W. Miller;William H. Norman;Stephen B. Bishop;Michael G. Dow

  • Social support and the course of bipolar disorder.

    Sheri L. Johnson;Carol A. Winett;Bjorn Meyer;William J. Greenhouse

  • Results of the DSM-IV mood disorders field trial

    Martin B. Keller;Daniel N. Klein;Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;James H. Kocsis

  • Changes in ecological momentary assessment reported affect associated with episodes of nonsuicidal self-injury.

    Michael F. Armey;Janis H. Crowther;Ivan W. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Brandon A. Gaudiano
Brandon A. Gaudiano Brown University
Lisa A. Uebelacker
Lisa A. Uebelacker Brown University
Christine E. Ryan
Christine E. Ryan Rhode Island Hospital
Carlos A. Camargo
Carlos A. Camargo Harvard University
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
Richard A. Brown
Richard A. Brown The University of Texas at Austin
Geoffrey Tremont
Geoffrey Tremont Brown University
Michael D. Stein
Michael D. Stein Boston University
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a diverse and dynamic field, offering many online degree options and varied career trajectories. As the discipline expands, new specializations are emerging—such as jobs in spiritual psychology, which blend traditional psychological practice with an emphasis on personal growth and spiritual well-being. These unique career paths are ideal for those interested in holistic approaches to mental health.

Other fast-growing fields include sports psychology, offering roles that work closely with athletes and teams. The sport psychologist job outlook is promising as demand rises for mental resilience training in competitive environments.

It’s important to understand the differences in roles within the mental health space. For example, knowing the clinical therapist vs psychologist differences can help students choose the path that best matches their goals for practice and licensure.

Finally, those considering advanced study should explore the wide variety of career paths for phd in psychology, ranging from academic research and teaching to leadership roles in healthcare or corporate organizations. Online psychology programs can be a flexible start to any of these rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles