World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
25867
World Ranking
13254
National Ranking
6751

Psychology

D-Index
90
Citations
28515
World Ranking
958
National Ranking
605

Ivan W. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ivan W. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan W. Miller is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specific concentration in Neurology. This includes detailed work in neurosurgical procedures and complications, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, as well as traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

The scientist has contributed to the publication of papers in notable venues, particularly in the journal Neurosurgery. Their recent work includes a paper titled A Comparison of Initial GCS and Frailty for Predicting Outcomes Following Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage, published in 2020 in Neurosurgery.

  • Matthew H. McIntyre
  • Cameron Rawanduzy
  • Adil Afridi
  • Jesse Honig
  • Mohamed Halabi

These individuals frequently collaborate with Ivan W. Miller across their research efforts. The scientist's principal topics of investigation are closely aligned with clinical and surgical challenges in neurology, especially those related to hemorrhagic conditions and postoperative outcomes.

  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The focus on these topics is reflected in their publication record and ongoing academic inquiries. Their work contributes to advancing understanding of how clinical scores such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) relate to patient outcomes in chronic subdural hemorrhage scenarios, situating their scholarship within both clinical and surgical neurology domains.

Best Publications

  • THE McMASTER FAMILY ASSESSMENT DEVICE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY*

    Ivan W. Miller;Nathan B. Epstein;Duane S. Bishop;Gabor I. Keitner

  • The McMaster Approach to Families: theory, assessment, treatment and research

    Ivan W. Miller;Christine E. Ryan;Gabor I. Keitner;Duane S. Bishop

  • A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples.

    Robert I. Kabacoff;Ivan W. Miller;Duane S. Bishop;Nathan B. Epstein

  • The modified Hamilton rating scale for depression: Reliability and validity

    Ivan W. Miller;Stephen B. Bishop;William H. Norman;Heather Maddever

  • Reliability and validity of a smoking timeline follow-back interview.

    Richard A. Brown;Ellen S. Burgess;Suzanne D. Sales;Jessica A. Whiteley;Jessica A. Whiteley

  • The McMaster model: A view of healthy family functioning.

    Nathan B. Epstein;Christine E. Ryan;Duane S. Bishop;Ivan W. Miller

  • Family functioning and major depression: an overview

    Gabor I. Keitner;Ivan W. Miller

  • Postpartum Depression in Women Receiving Public Assistance: Pilot Study of an Interpersonal-Therapy-Oriented Group Intervention

    Caron Zlotnick;Sheri L. Johnson;Ivan W. Miller;Teri Pearlstein

  • Therapeutic alliance in depression treatment: controlling for prior change and patient characteristics.

    Daniel N. Klein;Joseph E. Schwartz;Neil J. Santiago;Dina Vivian

  • Multicenter Pilot Treatment Trial for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    W. Curt LaFrance;W. Curt LaFrance;Grayson L. Baird;Grayson L. Baird;Grayson L. Baird;John J. Barry;Andrew S. Blum

  • The Treatment of Chronic Depression, Part 3: Psychosocial Functioning Before and After Treatment With Sertraline or Imipramine

    I W Miller;G I Keitner;A F Schatzberg;D N Klein

  • Hatha yoga for depression: critical review of the evidence for efficacy, plausible mechanisms of action, and directions for future research.

    Lisa A Uebelacker;Gary Epstein-Lubow;Brandon A Gaudiano;Geoffrey Tremont

  • Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study

    Ivan W. Miller;Carlos A. Camargo;Sarah A. Arias;Ashley F. Sullivan

  • Learned helplessness in humans: A review and attribution-theory model.

    Ivan W. Miller;William H. Norman

  • Evaluating and Treating Families: The McMaster Approach

    Christine E. Ryan;Nathan B. Epstein;Gabor I. Keitner;Ivan W. Miller

  • Increases in manic symptoms after life events involving goal attainment.

    Sheri L. Johnson;David Sandrow;Björn Meyer;Ray Winters

  • Life events and suicidal ideation and behavior: A systematic review

    Richard T. Liu;Ivan W. Miller

  • The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation: reliability and validity

    Ivan W. Miller;William H. Norman;Stephen B. Bishop;Michael G. Dow

  • Social support and the course of bipolar disorder.

    Sheri L. Johnson;Carol A. Winett;Bjorn Meyer;William J. Greenhouse

  • Results of the DSM-IV mood disorders field trial

    Martin B. Keller;Daniel N. Klein;Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;James H. Kocsis

  • Changes in ecological momentary assessment reported affect associated with episodes of nonsuicidal self-injury.

    Michael F. Armey;Janis H. Crowther;Ivan W. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Brandon A. Gaudiano
Brandon A. Gaudiano Brown University
Lisa A. Uebelacker
Lisa A. Uebelacker Brown University
Christine E. Ryan
Christine E. Ryan Rhode Island Hospital
Carlos A. Camargo
Carlos A. Camargo Harvard University
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
Richard A. Brown
Richard A. Brown The University of Texas at Austin
Geoffrey Tremont
Geoffrey Tremont Brown University
Michael D. Stein
Michael D. Stein Boston University
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a diverse and dynamic field, offering many online degree options and varied career trajectories. As the discipline expands, new specializations are emerging—such as jobs in spiritual psychology, which blend traditional psychological practice with an emphasis on personal growth and spiritual well-being. These unique career paths are ideal for those interested in holistic approaches to mental health.

Other fast-growing fields include sports psychology, offering roles that work closely with athletes and teams. The sport psychologist job outlook is promising as demand rises for mental resilience training in competitive environments.

It’s important to understand the differences in roles within the mental health space. For example, knowing the clinical therapist vs psychologist differences can help students choose the path that best matches their goals for practice and licensure.

Finally, those considering advanced study should explore the wide variety of career paths for phd in psychology, ranging from academic research and teaching to leadership roles in healthcare or corporate organizations. Online psychology programs can be a flexible start to any of these rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles