World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
8443
World Ranking
5380
National Ranking
456

Andreas Fellgiebel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Fellgiebel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 213 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andreas Fellgiebel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Fellgiebel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Fellgiebel is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. The research focuses primarily on Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with significant contributions in subfields such as General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Social and Demographic Issues in Germany
  • Health and Medical Studies
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Andreas Fellgiebel has published frequently in several venues, reflecting a consistent presence in the field. The common publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • GeroPsych
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • Psychotherapie im Alter

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Andreas Fellgiebel include:

  • Lifetime musical training and cognitive performance in a memory clinic population: A cross-sectional study, 2020, Musicae Scientiae
  • Bupropion for the Treatment of Apathy in Alzheimer Disease, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Psychobiological mechanisms underlying the health-beneficial effects of music in people living with dementia: A systematic review of the literature, 2021, Physiology & Behavior
  • Primary dementia care based on the individual needs of the patient: study protocol of the cluster randomized controlled trial, DemStepCare, 2021, BMC Geriatrics
  • Dorsolateral Prefrontal Functional Connectivity Predicts Working Memory Training Gains, 2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Katharina Geschke
  • Alexandra Wuttke-Linnemann
  • Dominik Wolf
  • Stefan Teipel
  • Florian U. Fischer

Best Publications

  • Ultrastructural hippocampal and white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Paulo Wille;Matthias J Müller;Georg Winterer

  • Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany.

    A. G. Franke;C. Bonertz;M. Christmann;M. Huss

  • Color-coded diffusion-tensor-imaging of posterior cingulate fiber tracts in mild cognitive impairment.

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Matthias J. Müller;Paulo Wille;Paulo R. Dellani

  • Multimodal imaging in Alzheimer's disease: validity and usefulness for early detection

    Stefan Teipel;Stefan Teipel;Alexander Drzezga;Michel J Grothe;Michel J Grothe;Henryk Barthel

  • Functional implications of hippocampal volume and diffusivity in mild cognitive impairment

    Matthias J. Müller;Dirk Greverus;Paulo Roberto Dellani;Carsten Weibrich

  • Acute Cerebrovascular Disease in the Young The Stroke in Young Fabry Patients Study

    Arndt Rolfs;Franz Fazekas;Ulrike Grittner;Martin Dichgans

  • Subregional basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study.

    Ingo Kilimann;Michel Grothe;Helmut Heinsen;Eduardo Joaquim Lopez Alho

  • CNS manifestations of Fabry's disease

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Matthias J Müller;Lionel Ginsberg

  • The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Clifford R. Jack;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer

  • Diagnostic utility of hippocampal size and mean diffusivity in amnestic MCI

    Matthias J. Müller;Dirk Greverus;Carsten Weibrich;Paulo Roberto Dellani

  • Cerebrovascular Involvement in Fabry Disease Current Status of Knowledge

    Edwin H Kolodny;Andreas Fellgiebel;Max J Hilz;Katherine Sims

  • SPM-based count normalization provides excellent discrimination of mild Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment from healthy aging.

    Igor Yakushev;Alexander Hammers;Andreas Fellgiebel;Irene Schmidtmann

  • Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol.

    Marina Boccardi;Martina Bocchetta;Félix C. Morency;D. Louis Collins

  • Predicting conversion to dementia in mild cognitive impairment by volumetric and diffusivity measurements of the hippocampus

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Paulo R. Dellani;Dirk Greverus;Armin Scheurich

  • Increased CSF APPs-α levels in patients with Alzheimer disease treated with acitretin

    Kristina Endres;Falk Fahrenholz;Johannes Lotz;Christoph Hiemke

  • Choice of reference area in studies of Alzheimer's disease using positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose-F18

    Igor Yakushev;Christian Landvogt;Hans Georg Buchholz;Andreas Fellgiebel

  • Robust Automated Detection of Microstructural White Matter Degeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Machine Learning Classification of Multicenter DTI Data

    Martin Dyrba;Michael Ewers;Martin Wegrzyn;Ingo Kilimann

  • Diagnostic utility of different MRI and MR angiography measures in Fabry disease

    A. Fellgiebel;I. Keller;D. Marin;M. J. Müller

  • Multicenter stability of diffusion tensor imaging measures: A European clinical and physical phantom study

    Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Sigrid Reuter;Sigrid Reuter;Bram Stieltjes;Julio Acosta-Cabronero

  • Altered whole-brain white matter networks in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    Florian Udo Fischer;Dominik Wolf;Armin Scheurich;Andreas Fellgiebel

  • Functional relevant loss of long association fibre tracts integrity in early Alzheimer's disease

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Ingrid Schermuly;Alexander Gerhard;Isabel Keller

  • Anatomical MRI and DTI in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A european multicenter study

    Stefan J Teipel;Stefan J Teipel;Martin Wegrzyn;Thomas Meindl;Giovanni B Frisoni

  • Research Article The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer;Kristian S. Frederiksen

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor Yakushev
Igor Yakushev Technical University of Munich
Peter Stoeter
Peter Stoeter Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Stefan J. Teipel
Stefan J. Teipel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Massimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Arun L.W. Bokde
Arun L.W. Bokde Trinity College Dublin
Florian Fischer
Florian Fischer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michel J. Grothe
Michel J. Grothe Institute of Biomedicine of Seville
Klaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Fellgiebel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles