World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
10776
World Ranking
3195
National Ranking
275

Peter Stoeter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stoeter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 263 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Stoeter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stoeter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Stoeter is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research activity spans multiple fields primarily centered on medicine and neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on neurology and related subfields such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging, as well as molecular biology.

The main topics of Peter Stoeter's work include neurological diseases and metabolism, meningioma and schwannoma management, RNA regulation and disease, glioma diagnosis and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, hereditary neurological disorders, and pituitary gland disorders and treatments.

Notable recent papers authored by Peter Stoeter or within their research domain include:

  • Functional connectivity of the motor system in dystonia due to PKAN, 2021, eNeurologicalSci
  • MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response in meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery, 2022, Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Development of the Arterial Supply of the Spinal Cord Tissue Based on Radioanatomical and Histological Studies in Cattle, 2021, Clinical Neuroradiology
  • Cerebral and cerebellar white matter tract alterations in patients with Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration (PKAN), 2022, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • Changes in Cerebral Gray and White Matter in Patients with Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration: A Long-Term Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-Up Study, 2021, Journal of Movement Disorders

Frequent co-authors in Peter Stoeter's research include:

  • Herwin Speckter
  • José Bido
  • Diones Rivera
  • Luis Suazo
  • Santiago Valenzuela

Peter Stoeter has published in a variety of scientific venues, with multiple contributions particularly to the following journals:

  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neuroradiology

The scientist's body of work reveals interdisciplinary approaches combining medical imaging, neurological disease mechanisms, and advanced computational techniques such as machine learning to explore diagnostics and treatment strategies in their areas of study.

Best Publications

  • Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke.

    Peter P. Urban;Thomas Wolf;Michael Uebele;Jürgen J. Marx

  • Ultrastructural hippocampal and white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Paulo Wille;Matthias J Müller;Georg Winterer

  • Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling.

    Ralf Schlösser;Thomas Gesierich;Bettina Kaufmann;Goran Vucurevic

  • Color-coded diffusion-tensor-imaging of posterior cingulate fiber tracts in mild cognitive impairment.

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Matthias J. Müller;Paulo Wille;Paulo R. Dellani

  • Functional implications of hippocampal volume and diffusivity in mild cognitive impairment

    Matthias J. Müller;Dirk Greverus;Paulo Roberto Dellani;Carsten Weibrich

  • Disturbed structural connectivity is related to inattention and impulsivity in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Andreas Konrad;Thomas F. Dielentheis;Dschamil El Masri;Martin Bayerl;Martin Bayerl

  • Brainstem reflex circuits revisited.

    Giorgio Cruccu;G. D. Iannetti;J. J. Marx;F. Thoemke

  • Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial observations.

    Stefan Hunsche;Michael E. Moseley;Peter Stoeter;Maj Hedehus

  • High opiate receptor binding potential in the human lateral pain system.

    Ulf Baumgärtner;Hans-Georg Buchholz;Alexander Bellosevich;Walter Magerl

  • Diagnostic utility of hippocampal size and mean diffusivity in amnestic MCI

    Matthias J. Müller;Dirk Greverus;Carsten Weibrich;Paulo Roberto Dellani

  • Virtual reality system for planning minimally invasive neurosurgery. Technical note.

    Axel Thomas Stadie;Ralf Alfons Kockro;Robert Reisch;Andrei Tropine

  • Left-hemisphere dominance in early nociceptive processing in the human parasylvian cortex.

    Tanja Schlereth;Ulf Baumgärtner;Walter Magerl;Peter Stoeter

  • Multiple somatotopic representations of heat and mechanical pain in the operculo-insular cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study.

    Ulf Baumgärtner;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Laura Zambreanu;Peter Stoeter

  • Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

    Matthias Gamer;Thomas Bauermann;Peter Stoeter;Gerhard Vossel

  • COMT genotype predicts BOLD signal and noise characteristics in prefrontal circuits

    Georg Winterer;Francesco Musso;Francesco Musso;Goran Vucurevic;Peter Stoeter

  • Predicting conversion to dementia in mild cognitive impairment by volumetric and diffusivity measurements of the hippocampus

    Andreas Fellgiebel;Paulo R. Dellani;Dirk Greverus;Armin Scheurich

  • Functional MRI of human primary somatosensory and motor cortex during median nerve stimulation.

    J Spiegel;J Tintera;J Gawehn;P Stoeter

  • Cerebellar Speech Representation: Lesion Topography in Dysarthria as Derived From Cerebellar Ischemia and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Peter Paul Urban;Juergen Marx;Stefan Hunsche;Joachim Gawehn

  • Asymmetry in the human primary somatosensory cortex and handedness.

    Patrick Jung;Ulf Baumgärtner;Thomas Bauermann;Walter Magerl

  • Cerebral activation in patients with somatoform pain disorder exposed to pain and stress: an fMRI study.

    Peter Stoeter;Thomas Bauermann;R. Nickel;L. Corluka

  • Evidence for cortical visual substitution of chronic bilateral vestibular failure (an fMRI study).

    Marianne Dieterich;Thomas Bauermann;Christoph Best;Peter Stoeter

Frequent Co-Authors

Marianne Dieterich
Marianne Dieterich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andreas Fellgiebel
Andreas Fellgiebel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Georg Winterer
Georg Winterer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Giorgio Cruccu
Giorgio Cruccu Sapienza University of Rome
Alexander Gerhard
Alexander Gerhard University of Manchester
Gian Domenico Iannetti
Gian Domenico Iannetti University College London
Igor Yakushev
Igor Yakushev Technical University of Munich
Frank Rösch
Frank Rösch Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Frank Birklein
Frank Birklein Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Stoeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles