World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6509
World Ranking
9767
National Ranking
610

Oege de Moor publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oege de Moor sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 91 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Oege de Moor D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oege de Moor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oege de Moor is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile is centered around a research career in which they have contributed to the scientific community through various forms of scholarly work.

There is no publicly available information on recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues related to their work. Similarly, there are no records of book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or main topics of research currently documented.

The absence of recorded awards indicates that no formal recognitions have been publicly associated with their name in the information provided.

Despite limited visible bibliometric data, affiliation with a notable institution such as the University of Oxford suggests engagement in a rigorous academic environment. This affiliation underscores a positioning within a research-intensive setting.

The lack of detailed documentation on research topics, publications, and collaborations presents a profile focused on affiliation rather than specific scientific outputs or contributions available for review at this time.

Best Publications

  • The Algebra of Programming

    Richard Bird;Oege de Moor

  • Algebra of programming

    Richard Bird;Oege de Moor

  • Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ

    Chris Allan;Pavel Avgustinov;Aske Simon Christensen;Laurie Hendren

  • abc: an extensible AspectJ compiler

    Pavel Avgustinov;Aske Simon Christensen;Laurie Hendren;Sascha Kuzins

  • CodeQuest : scalable source code queries with datalog

    Elnar Hajiyev;Mathieu Verbaere;Oege de Moor

  • Compiling embedded languages

    Conal Elliott;Sigbjørn Finne;Oege De Moor

  • A memory efficient reachability data structure through bit vector compression

    Sebastiaan J. van Schaik;Oege de Moor

  • Forwarding in Attribute Grammars for Modular Language Design

    Eric Van Wyk;Oege de Moor;Kevin Backhouse;Paul Kwiatkowski

  • JunGL: a scripting language for refactoring

    Mathieu Verbaere;Ran Ettinger;Oege de Moor

  • Making trace monitors feasible

    Pavel Avgustinov;Julian Tibble;Oege de Moor

  • Optimising aspectJ

    Pavel Avgustinov;Aske Simon Christensen;Laurie Hendren;Sascha Kuzins

  • Specifying and implementing refactorings

    Max Schaefer;Oege de Moor

  • Sound and extensible renaming for java

    Max Schäfer;Torbjörn Ekman;Oege de Moor

  • Static analysis of aspects

    Damien Sereni;Oege de Moor

  • Measuring the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programs

    Bruno Dufour;Christopher Goard;Laurie Hendren;Oege de Moor

  • Categories, Relations and Dynamic Programming

    Oege De Moor

  • Imperative Program Transformation by Rewriting

    David Lacey;Oege de Moor

  • Stepping Stones over the Refactoring Rubicon

    Max Schäfer;Mathieu Verbaere;Torbjörn Ekman;Oege Moor

  • Generic Program Transformation

    Oege de Moor;Ganesh Sittampalam

  • Keynote Address: .QL for Source Code Analysis

    Unknown

  • QL: Object-oriented Queries on Relational Data.

    Pavel Avgustinov;Oege de Moor;Michael Peyton Jones;Max Schäfer

  • Code Quest : Scalable Source Code Queries with Datalog

    Elnar Hajiyev;Mathieu Verbaere;Oege De Moor

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie Hendren
Laurie Hendren McGill University
Eric Bodden
Eric Bodden University of Paderborn
Michael I. Schwartzbach
Michael I. Schwartzbach Aarhus University
Danny Dig
Danny Dig University of Colorado Boulder
Frank Tip
Frank Tip Northeastern University
Ralph E. Johnson
Ralph E. Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William G. Griswold
William G. Griswold University of California, San Diego
John Hatcliff
John Hatcliff Kansas State University
Georg Gottlob
Georg Gottlob University of Calabria
Robert Glück
Robert Glück University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of degree options and career routes. With today’s digital learning environment, more students are exploring affordable and flexible pathways—such as online degree programs—to get ahead.

If you’re considering more advanced qualifications, you might be interested in the cheapest doctorate degree online programs. These provide an opportunity to earn a terminal degree without the high cost usually associated with on-campus study. Similarly, those in the education field may research the cheapest edd offerings for accelerated, affordable administrative leadership.

Looking for a quicker start? You can explore an associate degree in 6 months online. This can be a stepping stone into tech careers or a way to continue later toward a bachelor’s. Alternatively, students interested in technology’s business applications may find value in pursuing an online college business degree—building a blend of programming and entrepreneurial skills.

These alternative online pathways make it more convenient for learners worldwide to advance their education and careers in technology, business, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Oege de Moor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles