World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Klaus Ostermann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Ostermann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Klaus Ostermann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Ostermann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Ostermann is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a focus on areas including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Hardware and Architecture, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The primary topics of their research encompass logic, programming, and type systems, formal methods in verification, software engineering research, logic, reasoning and knowledge, advanced software engineering methodologies, security and verification in computing, as well as parallel computing and optimization techniques.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Effects as capabilities: effect handlers and lightweight effect polymorphism," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Effekt: Capability-passing style for type- and effect-safe, extensible effect handlers in Scala," 2020, Journal of Functional Programming
  • "Compiling effect handlers in capability-passing style," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "From Capabilities to Regions: Enabling Efficient Compilation of Lexical Effect Handlers," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Introduction and elimination, left and right," 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Frequent co-authors working alongside Ostermann include Jonathan Immanuel Brachthäuser, Philipp Schuster, Marius Müller, David A. Binder, and Ingo Skupin.

Common venues for publishing research are:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Functional Programming

Best Publications

  • Conquering aspects with Caesar

    Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • An overview of caesarj

    Ivica Aracic;Vaidas Gasiunas;Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • Variability management with feature-oriented programming and aspects

    Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • Variability-aware parsing in the presence of lexical macros and conditional compilation

    Christian Kästner;Paolo G. Giarrusso;Tillmann Rendel;Sebastian Erdweg

  • Dynamically Composable Collaborations with Delegation Layers

    Klaus Ostermann

  • Virtual machine support for dynamic join points

    Christoph Bockisch;Michael Haupt;Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • Expressive pointcuts for increased modularity

    Klaus Ostermann;Mira Mezini;Christoph Bockisch

  • SugarJ: library-based syntactic language extensibility

    Sebastian Erdweg;Tillmann Rendel;Christian Kästner;Klaus Ostermann

  • A virtual class calculus

    Erik Ernst;Klaus Ostermann;William R. Cook

  • Polymorphic embedding of dsls

    Christian Hofer;Klaus Ostermann;Tillmann Rendel;Adriaan Moors

  • A variability-aware module system

    Christian Kästner;Klaus Ostermann;Sebastian Erdweg

  • Integrating independent components with on-demand remodularization

    Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • Variability Mining: Consistent Semi-automatic Detection of Product-Line Features

    Christian Kastner;Alexander Dreiling;Klaus Ostermann

  • Toward variability-aware testing

    Christian Kästner;Alexander von Rhein;Sebastian Erdweg;Jonas Pusch

  • Overview of CaesarJ

    Ivica Aracic;Vaidas Gasiunas;Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • Pointcuts as Functional Queries

    Michael Eichberg;Mira Mezini;Klaus Ostermann

  • A theory of changes for higher-order languages: incrementalizing λ-calculi by static differentiation

    Yufei Cai;Paolo G. Giarrusso;Tillmann Rendel;Klaus Ostermann

  • Object-oriented composition untangled

    Klaus Ostermann;Mira Mezini

  • Projectional editing of variational software

    Eric Walkingshaw;Klaus Ostermann

  • Denotational validation of higher-order Bayesian inference

    Adam Ścibior;Ohad Kammar;Matthijs Vákár;Sam Staton

Frequent Co-Authors

Mira Mezini
Mira Mezini Technical University of Darmstadt
Christian Kästner
Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University
Eelco Visser
Eelco Visser Delft University of Technology
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Sven Apel
Sven Apel Saarland University
Hongseok Yang
Hongseok Yang Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
William R. Cook
William R. Cook The University of Texas at Austin
Zoubin Ghahramani
Zoubin Ghahramani University of Cambridge
Ulrich Trautwein
Ulrich Trautwein University of Tübingen
Michael Leuschel
Michael Leuschel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science education in the USA opens up multiple options for online degrees and diverse career paths. Many students begin with an associates degree online, allowing them to build foundational skills at an affordable pace and later transfer to a four-year program.

For those seeking advanced opportunities and higher earning potential, pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees can be an excellent choice. These high-demand programs boost employment options and prepare graduates for leadership and specialized roles.

Cost is a major concern for many prospective students. Fortunately, there are numerous cheapest online degrees now available, making higher education more accessible than ever before. Plus, if you’re worried about academic requirements, consider the best colleges for low gpa, which offer reputable programs and flexible admissions.

With flexible online learning options, tailored degree levels, and support for all types of students, forging a new Computer Science career path in the USA has never been more achievable.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Ostermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles