World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
6245
World Ranking
7318
National Ranking
3187

Scott D. Stoller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Stoller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott D. Stoller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Stoller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott D. Stoller is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The scientist's work covers multiple research topics such as:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Logic, programming, and type systems

Scott D. Stoller has contributed to various publication venues. The most frequent include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Journal of Logic and Computation
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Selected recent papers include:

  • ACTION-EHR: Patient-Centric Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Data Management for Cancer Care, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Neural predictive monitoring and a comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches, 2021, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • A distributed simplex architecture for multi-agent systems, 2022, Journal of Systems Architecture
  • Founded semantics and constraint semantics of logic rules, 2020, Journal of Logic and Computation
  • Knowledge of uncertain worlds: programming with logical constraints, 2020, Journal of Logic and Computation

Scott D. Stoller has published a book titled Data and Applications Security and Privacy XXXVI through Springer Science+Business Media in 2022.

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Scott A. Smolka
  • Yanhong A. Liu
  • Radu Grosu
  • Usama Mehmood
  • Shouvik Roy

Best Publications

  • Runtime analysis of atomicity for multithreaded programs

    L. Wang;S.D. Stoller

  • ACTION-EHR: Patient-Centric Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Data Management for Cancer Care.

    Alevtina Dubovitskaya;Alevtina Dubovitskaya;Furqan Baig;Zhigang Xu;Rohit Shukla

  • Mining Attribute-Based Access Control Policies

    Zhongyuan Xu;Scott D. Stoller

  • Testing Concurrent Java Programs using Randomized Scheduling

    Scott D. Stoller

  • Efficient policy analysis for administrative role based access control

    Scott D. Stoller;Ping Yang;C R. Ramakrishnan;Mikhail I. Gofman

  • Cryptographic support for fault-tolerant distributed computing

    Yaron Minsky;Robbert van Renesse;Fred B. Schneider;Scott D. Stoller

  • Model-Checking Multi-threaded Distributed Java Programs

    Scott D. Stoller

  • Model-checking multi-threaded distributed Java programs

    Scott D. Stoller

  • Runtime verification with state estimation

    Scott D. Stoller;Ezio Bartocci;Justin Seyster;Radu Grosu

  • Accurate and efficient runtime detection of atomicity errors in concurrent programs

    Liqiang Wang;Scott D. Stoller

  • Policy analysis for Administrative Role-Based Access Control

    Amit Sasturkar;Ping Yang;Scott D. Stoller;C. R. Ramakrishnan

  • Static caching for incremental computation

    Yanhong A. Liu;Scott D. Stoller;Tim Teitelbaum

  • Leader Election in Distributed Systems with Crash Failures

    Scott D. Stoller

  • Automated type-based analysis of data races and atomicity

    Amit Sasturkar;Rahul Agarwal;Liqiang Wang;Scott D. Stoller

  • Detecting potential deadlocks with static analysis and run-time monitoring

    Rahul Agarwal;Liqiang Wang;Scott D. Stoller

  • Detecting global predicates in distributed systems with clocks

    Scott D. Stoller

  • From recursion to iteration: what are the optimizations?

    Yanhong A. Liu;Scott D. Stoller

  • Towards a framework and a benchmark for testing tools for multi‐threaded programs

    Yaniv Eytani;Klaus Havelund;Scott D. Stoller;Shmuel Ur

  • Policy analysis for administrative role based access control

    A. Sasturkar;Ping Yang;S.D. Stoller;C.R. Ramakrishnan

  • Run-time detection of potential deadlocks for programs with locks, semaphores, and condition variables

    Rahul Agarwal;Scott D. Stoller

  • {SLEUTH}: Real-time Attack Scenario Reconstruction from {COTS} Audit Data

    Nahid Hossain;Sadegh M. Milajerdi;Junao Wang;Birhanu Eshete

  • Mining Attribute-Based Access Control Policies from Logs

    Zhongyuan Xu;Scott D. Stoller

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka Stony Brook University
Radu Grosu
Radu Grosu TU Wien
Erez Zadok
Erez Zadok Stony Brook University
Klaus Havelund
Klaus Havelund Jet Propulsion Lab
C. R. Ramakrishnan
C. R. Ramakrishnan Stony Brook University
R. C. Sekar
R. C. Sekar Stony Brook University
Ashish Tiwari
Ashish Tiwari Microsoft (United States)
Fred B. Schneider
Fred B. Schneider Cornell University
V. N. Venkatakrishnan
V. N. Venkatakrishnan University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can create flexible pathways into technology and business industries. Prospective students can begin with an online associate degree, providing a fast entry point for IT basics and foundational skills.

Those aiming for academic leadership or advanced research roles may consider affordable online doctoral programs in technology or related fields. These programs often offer significant cost savings and the flexibility needed for professionals balancing work and study.

Aspiring educators seeking leadership roles in higher education might find value in accelerated edd programs online, which can fast-track their qualifications and career progression.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and business, pursuing one of the best online business degree programs can open doors to roles in tech management, entrepreneurship, or consulting.

Online education offers flexible options at every stage—from associate to doctorate—helping students tailor their educational journey to their career goals and current life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Stoller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles